Baron David Ward

[notorial dissent]

I'm sure they would be more than happy to let him leave, I'm equally sure the host countries won't be happy to let him in.

[TheNewSaint]

Well, if he did go to Portugal, he wouldn't be any worse at speaking the local language.

[Philistine]

Is he really that painfully illiterate, or does he consider his lazy misspellings quaint?

[TheNewSaint]

Is he really that painfully illiterate, or does he consider his lazy misspellings quaint?

He's always been bad with spelling and grammar, but i think he's deteriorating. His earlier missives in this thread aren't nearly as bad.

[Wakeman52]

He has described himself as dyslexic; he does exhibit all the characteristics.

[NYGman]

He has described himself as dyslexic; he does exhibit all the characteristics.

As a fellow Dyslexic, No! But everyone is slightly different. Besides Just because you are Dyslexic, doesn't mean you can't use spell check. While you can still make mistakes, it really cuts them down a lot!

[LaVidaRoja]

Dyslexicia si nuf!

[Chaos]

I thought he was saying he was going to become pro wrestler Dyslex-X

[grixit]

His progflash is devastating!

[BoomerSooner17]

I thought he was saying he was going to become pro wrestler Dyslex-X

Propain sounds like the name of a wrestler.

[Philistine]

I don't think it's dyslexia, I think it's laziness or ignorance.

[Wakeman52]

Just because you are Dyslexic, doesn't mean you can't use spell check. While you can still make mistakes, it really cuts them down a lot!

My eldest is severely dyslexic & has always struggled with spelling, even with aids like that. He benefited more from the rise of devices such as MacBooks & iPhones, with their ability to integrate his calendar, reminders & so on, during his later school and then university courses, culminating in a 2:1 degree. These have now been largely overtaken by his partner, who is to become his wife later this year, & her organising skills!

BVT's spelling is very reminiscent of my son's style, with its phonetic looking words.

[Philistine]

Just because you are Dyslexic, doesn't mean you can't use spell check. While you can still make mistakes, it really cuts them down a lot!

My eldest is severely dyslexic & has always struggled with spelling, even with aids like that. He benefited more from the rise of devices such as MacBooks & iPhones, with their ability to integrate his calendar, reminders & so on, during his later school and then university courses, culminating in a 2:1 degree. These have now been largely overtaken by his partner, who is to become his wife later this year, & her organising skills!

BVT's spelling is very reminiscent of my son's style, with its phonetic looking words.

If that is the case for the Baron, then I apologize.

[NYGman]

Just because you are Dyslexic, doesn't mean you can't use spell check. While you can still make mistakes, it really cuts them down a lot!

My eldest is severely dyslexic & has always struggled with spelling, even with aids like that. He benefited more from the rise of devices such as MacBooks & iPhones, with their ability to integrate his calendar, reminders & so on, during his later school and then university courses, culminating in a 2:1 degree. These have now been largely overtaken by his partner, who is to become his wife later this year, & her organising skills!

BVT's spelling is very reminiscent of my son's style, with its phonetic looking words.

Everyone is different and point taken, but for me, even selecting the first choice for a red squiggle word, is usually closer to what I was typing over leaving the misspelled word. Over time Predictive typing keyboards, do a great job of correcting and leaning, and cuts down on misspelled words, but there are still mistakes. My comments we based on my practice of going back over my typed massage, and right click/choose first my way down. Yes I have mistakes, but not like that. He just doesn't' seem to be trying.

By the way, I typed this freeform, without trying to spell correctly. It was a sea of RED, and I went back and chose the fist selection, without regard to what it was. Hopefully this demonstrates my point.

[SteveUK]

The Baron is back (!!!!1!!!!). With this rather lengthy and pointless essay on his security by way of a lien page. He still seems to think his run in over the parking ticket is some sort of world altering legal precedent. Despite the fact he got evicted and now lives in a truck, he still proclaims gauranteed success (!!1!!) "Something done 40 times over is cast iron and watertight. 8 with Judges one Barrister and 11 Lawyers"


Still, fortune favours the brave I suppose.

Look Guy’s this is simple.

It is all about understanding the words. The words are English words it is not double Dutch. So let’s look at some of the words.

OBLIGATION: There is only one kind of obligation. An obligation is something you have agreed to do. It is contract. Contract of employment. This is something that you have signed by picking up a pen and you have signed that agreement. You give your work in exchange for cash. The terms of your employment and what you do for that cash is in the terms and conditions. This is something that you have agreed to do in full knowledge and understanding. There is a formal document that is signed by both parties to this agreement. You know what this is. You read it and understand it. You signed that paper material evidence in fact. You can pick it up and read it whenever you like. Its real. It is tangible. You can touch it and read it. It is not a figment of your imagination. There can be no obligation without your formal agreement. Signed in wet ink. Without this formal agreement then there is not and cannot be any obligation. Anyone saying otherwise is committing fraud. OR they are a village idiot. I care not.

LIABILITY: There can only be a liability where you have failed in an obligation that you have agreed to in the contract. If you have failed in your agreed obligation by not turning up for work then the liability may be that you will not get paid. It will be in the terms and conditions that you have agreed to.

CLAIM: Generally it is only possible to make a claim where there is a formal contract. If someone is making a claim under a contract that does not exist where there is a claim that there is an Obligation or a liability. THEN the claimant is committing fraud.

1. Who is the claimant? What is their name?
2. Do they work for a company or government office?
3. What is there position in that office?
4. What is the company or office of government?
5. What is the claim?
6. Is there any foundation in fact to support this claim?

FRAUD: Is a criminal offence. It is a chargeable criminal offence. It is a criminal offence also which can incur a period of incarceration of seven to ten years and the latter where there is multiple instances off.
:
CHARGEABLE: What is a charge? This is the cash that you are going to charge them with an obligation to resolve. They have to send you the funds. Why do we use the words resolve instead of pay and funds instead of money. Look at the Bank of England Bank note. This is not a note for money. There is no money. There has been no money for 150 years. It is not backed by sterling solver or gold which is the money. It is a note based upon confidence and belief which is nothing. You cannot pay for anything without money. Take your £20 Note to the Bank of England and see if you can exit with 20 LBS in sterling silver. Good luck. You will be escorted from the bank under force for creating a disturbance of the piece. We do not use the words Pay or Money. That is fraud. This is your wake up call. Get a grip of the facts.

Maxims of Law: It is a Maxim that he who makes a claim carries the obligation to present the material evidence of that claim.
READ THIS 50 TIME OVER. Know what it means. If someone is making a claim then there had better be a contract in evidence otherwise they have formally agreed to be charged with fraud which is a chargeable criminal offence. NOW there is a contract as the claimant has made a claim which creates an obligation for the claimant and where there is an obligation then there is a contract. The claim is a contract where there is no foundation in evidence and the claim is fraud. READ THIS AGAIN. And AGAIN.

Legal: There is paper evidence which is formally signed in wet ink and is an agreement between the parties of that formal agreement. WHERE there is no material evidence of this agreement in fact or reality THEN anything else is by default illegal and criminal. When did you sign this contract or agreement? Where is the evidence in fact?

ILLEGAL: = Fraud, Criminal,

Malfeasance: the fact of someone in a position of authority intentionally doing something dishonest or illegal: A Wilful intention to be a criminal. A Wilful intention to cause distress and alarm. A wilful and belligerent act of terrorism. No one walking this earth has any authority over another. They are just people who put their pants on one leg at a time and shit down the pan like anybody else. I will not use politically correct speech here. Politically correct speech sends people to sleep. A spade is a spade and it will be called a spade. They have no authority unless you have signed that formal agreement that they have. They are terrorists. THE END.

STATUTE: A Statute is a legislative rule given force of law by the consent of the governed...... There is a critical word here. “BY” that word “BY” creates a dependency that must be fulfilled. The dependency is that you have agreed to be governed and signed that consent in wet ink. Case in fact MR DAVID WARD Vee Warrington Borough council 30th Day of May 2013. Exhibit “B” in the affidavit. MR DAVID WARD has no liability under the Act (Traffic management Act 2004) WHY???? 64.2 million people have not formally agreed to be governed and signed that agreement to give their consent. FACT.... Get used to the facts. WE only use facts in evidence. The material evidence of the FACTS.

The Government have no authority over you. The Police have no authority over you. The Judges have no authority over you and that is a FACT. Not a belief or my or anybody else’s opinion.

OFFICE: Paper shufflers. Useless people who suck the life out of you and call it TAX. It never puts any beans on the table.
Officer: Some one that works in a company office.

This is getting ridicules. These are all words in your native language called English. What the fuck!!!!. There is 40 files in the files tab at the top. Something done 40 times over is cast iron and watertight. 8 with Judges one Barrister and 11 Lawyers. Now get a grip. All you have to do is read them. Keep reading them. This is something I never had.

[Siegfried Shrink]

Got a link?

His 40 cases should make amusing Sunday reading after I have fulfilled my entirely non-contractual obligation to feed the cats.

[SteveUK]

Got a link?

His 40 cases should make amusing Sunday reading after I have fulfilled my entirely non-contractual obligation to feed the cats.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/798269636907862/about/

Some of the more recent posts are worth a read as well, a couple of folks call him out on his BS and it descends into chaos.

[wserra]

A Ward pearl of wisdom: "Knowledge is power.. But the nowledge must be factual and credable."

A sig if I ever saw one.

[longdog]

Predictably the great legal genius goes wrong immediately...

OBLIGATION: There is only one kind of obligation. An obligation is something you have agreed to do.

OBLIGATION: An act or course of action to which a person is morally or legally bound; a duty or commitment.

[John Uskglass]

Contract of employment. This is something that you have signed by picking up a pen and you have signed that agreement. You give your work in exchange for cash. The terms of your employment and what you do for that cash is in the terms and conditions. This is something that you have agreed to do in full knowledge and understanding. There is a formal document that is signed by both parties to this agreement. You know what this is. You read it and understand it. You signed that paper material evidence in fact. You can pick it up and read it whenever you like. Its real. It is tangible. You can touch it and read it. It is not a figment of your imagination. There can be no obligation without your formal agreement. Signed in wet ink. Without this formal agreement then there is not and cannot be any obligation. Anyone saying otherwise is committing fraud. OR they are a village idiot. I care not.

Up to a point, Lord Copper. Are the CAB frauds/village idiots? Because they say that -

There is always a contract between an employee and employer. You may not have anything in writing, but a contract will still exist. This is because your agreement to work for your employer and your employer’s agreement to pay you for your work forms a contract.

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/work/ ... employment

There's also the question of implied terms in contracts of employment.

If there’s nothing clearly agreed between you and your employer about a particular issue, it may be covered by an implied term - for example:

employees not stealing from their employer
your employer providing a safe and secure working environment
a legal requirement like the right to a minimum of 5.6 weeks’ paid holidays
something necessary to do the job like a driver having a valid licence
something that’s been done regularly in a company over a long time like paying a Christmas bonus

https://www.gov.uk/employment-contracts ... ract-terms