Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8227
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Burnaby49 »

Gregg wrote: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:06 am FWIW, my guess for her sekrit stash space is Snadringham. Its out of London, but still close, its not Windsor which would be too obvious and its The Queen's personal property, not a Crown Estate. I would normally guess Balmoral, because how large it is, but I think there are important symbolic and political reasons for her not to leave England were she to go anywhere.

So take that PoE, she's still gonna be the Queen.
She'd still be Queen if she slept in the fold-out couch in my basement rec-room. Location is irrelevant but POE needs something to hook the suckers.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by grixit »

You mean, she doesn't have to walk the secret maze under Westminster Abbey every full moon to renew her monarchial powers?
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Gregg »

Nope, all she has to do is not abdicate and not assume room temperature. If she can avoid those two things, she gets to be the Queen.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by TheNewSaint »

Gregg wrote: Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:50 am Nope, all she has to do is not abdicate and not assume room temperature. If she can avoid those two things, she gets to be the Queen.
Isn't "be overthrown" an option, at least historically?
Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8227
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Burnaby49 »

TheNewSaint wrote: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:20 am
Gregg wrote: Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:50 am Nope, all she has to do is not abdicate and not assume room temperature. If she can avoid those two things, she gets to be the Queen.
Isn't "be overthrown" an option, at least historically?
I'd pay to see the video of POE and his stalwart crew storming Buckingham Palace.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by grixit »

I've always assumed that the busbies are not the real guards; there are SAS with machine guns hiding in the bushes.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by TheNewSaint »

grixit wrote: Thu Feb 07, 2019 4:26 am I've always assumed that the busbies are not the real guards; there are SAS with machine guns hiding in the bushes.
From what I learned on a recent tour of Windsor Castle, the palace guards are proper soldiers, and not to be messed with. Though I can believe that some supplemental, less famous security is in place.
Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8227
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Burnaby49 »

And let's not forget I was assuming an assault by Peter and his gang. The Queen and Prince Philip alone (with maybe Charles and Camilla lending a hand) would probably do a credible job of fighting off such a theoretical opposition.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
obadiah
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 1:47 pm
Location: The Gorge, Oregon

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by obadiah »

:haha:
1. There is a kind of law that I like, which are my own rules, which I call common law. It applies to me.
2. There are many other kinds of law but they don’t apply to me, because I say so."
LLAP
Comrade Sharik
Pirate
Pirate
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu May 11, 2017 2:17 pm

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Comrade Sharik »

The Queen and Prince Philip alone (with maybe Charles and Camilla lending a hand) would probably do a credible job of fighting off such a theoretical opposition.
Phil is quite handy with a Range Rover, as I understand it...
rumpelstilzchen
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2249
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
Location: Soho London

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by rumpelstilzchen »

Burnaby49 wrote: Thu Feb 07, 2019 2:16 pm And let's not forget I was assuming an assault by Peter and his gang.
I am not too sure that he has a gang. Having to get up and out of their armchairs.........need I say any more?
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
Hercule Parrot
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Hercule Parrot »

grixit wrote: Thu Feb 07, 2019 4:26 am I've always assumed that the busbies are not the real guards; there are SAS with machine guns hiding in the bushes.
Nah, they're too scarce for static guard work. Only about 500 of them (about half overseas at any given time). They do however have a base at Regents Park Barracks, and I imagine they have a proper nasty CT response on standby 24/7. The busbie chaps are fully-trained Household Cavalry, and will certainly have the weapons and drills to hold off a substantial armed attack until reinforcements arrive.

PoE knows this of course, and there's no chance of him putting his skin on the line by leading the sans culottes into revolutionary battle.
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
The Seventh String
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 325
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2017 8:48 pm

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by The Seventh String »

grixit wrote: Thu Feb 07, 2019 4:26 am I've always assumed that the busbies are not the real guards; there are SAS with machine guns hiding in the bushes.
Those in red jackets and busbies are the Queen’s Guard. They’re usually drawn from one of the five Foot Guards regiments, though other regiments are sometimes been invited to do the job. Half a company guards Buckingham Palace and another half company guards St. James Palace.

The Foot Guards aren’t just ceremonial, they’ve fought in pretty much every significant war the UK has been involved in since the various regiments were founded.

The ones wearing armour and riding horses are the Queen’s Life Guard. They’re from the small Household Cavalry Mounted Regiment. There’s also the Household Cavalry Regiment, which is a front-line service armoured recce regiment.

There may only be 50 or so of those big blokes on big horses, but I suspect they’d make very quick and messy work of PoE, the White Pandragons and the PLDers combined. Which would make a short but entertaining video should any of the rabble survive long enough to upload it to youtube. “I do not consent” is about as effective a defence against a heavy cavalry sword as it is against prosecution for driving with no licence, no tax and no insurance

As for “off the record” royal protection, the Metropolitan Police’s Specialist Operations Directorate gets to do quite a lot of it.
User avatar
BoomerSooner17
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 281
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 2:07 pm
Location: The Lone Star State

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by BoomerSooner17 »

The Queen's Guard could probably hold off PoE's forces with only their bayonets.
"Never in the field of human conflict, was so much owed (but not paid), by so few, to so many." - Sir Winston Churchill
User avatar
noblepa
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 730
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:20 pm

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by noblepa »

Burnaby49 wrote: Thu Feb 07, 2019 2:16 pm And let's not forget I was assuming an assault by Peter and his gang. The Queen and Prince Philip alone (with maybe Charles and Camilla lending a hand) would probably do a credible job of fighting off such a theoretical opposition.
I think that George and Charlotte could probably send that crowd packing.
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by notorial dissent »

Yes, the "guards" around the Queen and palaces are for real combat troops, highly trained, and many/most decorated combat vets who would make mush out of PoE and company without even raising a sweat.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
morrand
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 6:42 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by morrand »

As excellent as the Queen's guards are at combat in its various forms, I have to think they have so much more expertise and skill in calmly handling the sort of cranks that drift up to Westminster, from King Allan of Gondor (of Denver) all the way through to daffy Aunt Zelda of Mornington Crescent. Got to think the more likely scenario would be:

"Right, then, gentlemen. Just down the stairs and into the little room on the right there, if you would. Sorry? ... No, you see, there doesn't need to be a knob on the inside. You won't need to go to them. They will bring the crown in to you."
---
Morrand
Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8227
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Burnaby49 »

BoomerSooner17 wrote: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:33 am The Queen's Guard could probably hold off PoE's forces with only their bayonets.
Butter knives would do.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by notorial dissent »

Burnaby49 wrote: Fri Feb 08, 2019 2:22 am
BoomerSooner17 wrote: Fri Feb 08, 2019 12:33 am The Queen's Guard could probably hold off PoE's forces with only their bayonets.
Butter knives would do.
I rather suspect that stern looks would make them pee their pants and run for their lives.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Peter of England and WeaRe not a Bank

Post by Gregg »

But let's be truthful here, this would be the best youtube EVER.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.