Maybe that is how Jussie Smollett got his charges dropped!I know oral contract by counteroffer in open court in a criminal case or on the phone about a criminal case works 100% of the time. I've done it so many times and seen others so many times
![Laugh :haha:](./images/smilies/005.gif)
Maybe that is how Jussie Smollett got his charges dropped!I know oral contract by counteroffer in open court in a criminal case or on the phone about a criminal case works 100% of the time. I've done it so many times and seen others so many times
It really is not that puzzling. A prosecutor has an ethical duty, in most jurisdictions, only to bring cases they believe they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt. If they do not believe they can prove their case for whatever reason they might drop it or work out a plea deal or deferred prosecution agreement. Sometimes they drop the case without prejudice to allow the police to do more investigation and bring the charges again if they get more evidence.jonny sunday wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 2:04 pm I guess the prosecutor can do whatever they want with a case. Puzzling.
Not a thing to do with Jesse Smollet and not something I'm willing to allow you to say without backing up at least 2 points.I know oral contract by counteroffer in open court in a criminal case or on the phone about a criminal case works 100% of the time. I've done it so many times and seen others so many times
Personally, I'm worrying about the flying pork, piggses is messy.
We love you too, jonny.jonny sunday wrote:It is obvious you are just censoring people to drive your own narratives. You let everyone else who kisses your ass to say whatever they want to people you don't agree with. You are a coward. Afraid of other ideas. Cowards like you, with mentalities like you, are the exact reason slavery is so popular in the USA. Enjoy your slavery. Don't forget to pay your taxes. Enjoy hanging out with the DoucheLosers who echo your ideas. What a fucking coward. You have to make your own forum and search for pieces of shit to hang out with in your chamber of NPC.
No, we are not censoring people. You have not been censored. You were put on moderated status because you didn't follow the rules.jonny sunday wrote:It is obvious you are just censoring people to drive your own narratives. You let everyone else who kisses your ass to say whatever they want to people you don't agree with. You are a coward. Afraid of other ideas. Cowards like you, with mentalities like you, are the exact reason slavery is so popular in the USA. Enjoy your slavery. Don't forget to pay your taxes. Enjoy hanging out with the DoucheLosers who echo your ideas. What a fucking coward. You have to make your own forum and search for pieces of shit to hang out with in your chamber of NPC.
jonny, you appear to be arguing that the enforcement of tax law is morally wrong. Whether or not taxation is morally right or wrong is irrelevant in this discussion. My understanding is that Shrout's argument is that the law of the land supports Shrout's position, please correct me if I am wrong about this. This has got nothing to do with morals, it is a question about law. I would say that members of this forum who you would describe as "slaves" are not arguing about morals. Members of this forum are arguing about the position of the law. Having checked with the position of the law I would suggest that Shrout is wrong and "the slaves" are right. I would also draw to your attention the court has come to the same conclusion. It is possible that morally Shrout is right but it has to be said that legally, Shrout is talking out of his rectum. You too.It is obvious you are just censoring people to drive your own narratives. You let everyone else who kisses your ass to say whatever they want to people you don't agree with. You are a coward. Afraid of other ideas. Cowards like you, with mentalities like you, are the exact reason slavery is so popular in the USA. Enjoy your slavery. Don't forget to pay your taxes. Enjoy hanging out with the DoucheLosers who echo your ideas. What a fucking coward. You have to make your own forum and search for pieces of shit to hang out with in your chamber of NPC.
have you guys been preventing the sunday shake from posting his court victory transcripts because I'm not sure what being moderated has to do with providing evidence of his alleged 'victories'.thanks
Sent: Tue Apr 02, 2019 2:09 pm
From: jonny sunday
Recipient: Chaos
How fucking stupid are yall? I'm moderated. Did you forget already DoucheLoser? Every time I try and respond, after you cowardly fucking pieces of shit copy my private messages into the forum, I get censored. Regardless of whether or not I call you candy ass cowards pusillanimous pieces of shit. And that is exactly what all yall are. Fucking cowards. Get your fucking jollies off trying to impress your fudge packing boyfriends in the forum. I'm moderated. I guess you don't understand that because you suffer from aphasia and vagisitus.
I'm not going to waste my time parsing exactly what jonny said about Shrout. What follows is what he said about himself:jonny sunday wrote: ↑Tue Apr 02, 2019 7:17 pm I never said Winston Shrout was correct in his usage of bonds or his method of using bonds for his taxes. Never said it. Not once.
Proof? Nope.I am 100% sure the knowledge I have learned and ascertained have made me into a man who feels comfortable dealing with officers of the court, in and out of the courtroom.
Proof? Nope.I have saved money in attorney fees, and negotiated better settlements with prosecutors.
Proof? Nope.I have helped people move contracts through administrative process.
Proof? Nope.I have helped people enforce their claims on people who owed them.
Proof? Nope.I've negotiated deals for people on the phone with the other party's attorney.
Those I believe. Wow.I've made mistakes in court and been arrested.
Proof? Nope.I've written to the judge from jail, corrected the mistake and released from jail.
Proof? Nope.I've had judges in my court cases shake my hand, invite me in chambers, admonished me for my conduct, and I've gone back to those courts to visit.
Proof? Nope.I've had judges and prosecutors apologize to me.
Proof? Nope.The probation case attorney who sat in the court and saw me in one of the court rooms walked up to me with his wife, friend, friends wife and introduced them to me. Told stories about me in the court. He told me "Judge ... Loves you. Do you remember when him and the prosecutor told you they never wanted you to go to jail that day?"
I guess they'll talk to anyone.I play golf in local charity events and bump into some of these judges, clerks, bailiffs, attorneys and we have a nice chat.
And the name of that judge? Dear reader. It was Albert Einstein.
Really?
We ask jonny for "court cases proving his theory" because THAT IS THE ONLY FORM OF PROOF WHICH COUNTS. We aren't interested in some Fisher-Price Common Law Play Court, with chambers in the back room of the local Denny's, in some church seeking rental income for their parish hall, or in a corner of a disused industrial park warehouse. Unless Shrout's activities took place outside the borders of the United States, and had no nexus with anything within those borders, our courts have jurisdiction; thus, any claim by jonny that what Shrout has done "really takes place outside the jurisdiction" is delusional. That is especially true, given the fact that any competent lawyer could successfully argue a lack of jurisdiction, in court, IF THERE TRULY WAS A LACK OF JURISDICTION, and WIN.