Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Moderator: ArthurWankspittle

TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by TheNewSaint »

How's he even getting bookings or reservations at this point?
Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
Location: Brea, CA

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by Arthur Rubin »

LurkerRob wrote: Thu Apr 25, 2019 7:08 am You can see the masses racing to book their tickets for the latest round of TGBMS cinema screenings on May 3 at the following link.

https://www.ourscreen.com/profile/anarcho-film

With 3 days to go (tickets need to be booked by the 28th April).

Venue Attending Still needed

Islington 14 32
Streatham 4 29
Belfast 10 50
Birmingham 4 34
Manchester 4 43
Liverpool 4 32
Cardiff already cancelled
Glasgow already cancelled
I can't find the number attending on the website, but Belfast still needed is down to 34.
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by aesmith »

All canned, not enough ticket sales for any of them.
User avatar
NYGman
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 2272
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:01 pm
Location: New York, NY

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by NYGman »

I guess after talking about it so much, people realized it is all BS, and didn't bother to buy a ticket....
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by aesmith »

On the other hand a different link shows it going ahead in Belfast .. https://www.ourscreen.com/screening/48332 and yet another shows more slots with a week or so to run .. https://www.ourscreen.com/film/the-grea ... ge-swindle

Pretty amazing if 58 people have paid for Belfast, when none of the other showed more than 5 or so sold.
John Uskglass
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1052
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 1:21 pm

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by John Uskglass »

Strangely, although it says that 58 people are going, if you click through to 'Whose Going' there are only a dozen names.

https://www.ourscreen.com/screening/48332

I suppose they may have bought multiple tickets, but I suspect some sort of glitch.
aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by aesmith »

I see that random third parties can create their own screenings. For example picking a random city, cinema and date it advises me that at least 71 seats will need to be sold at a price of £4.99 each. Doesn't sound a great idea, with no commitment apparently needed from the person sponsoring the screening.
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by notorial dissent »

I keep wondering if he gave it away for free on the innerwebs if he'd get any more takers?
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by aesmith »

More of the same although referring to Northern Ireland this time ...
https://www.facebook.com/michael.oberni ... 4750416751

Seems the magic bullet is still something to do with deeds ..
You should have seen the look on the face of one of the spies when we presented the little-known NI equivalent of section 1 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, which renders every mortgage deed void and illegal in the absence of the signature being properly witnessed.
Hope everyone's signed up to the bandwagon ..
The Next Steps PDF download is currently being finalized and will be sent to everybody on the TGBMS Mailing List as soon as it is available, which, with a fair wind, should transpire this coming week.
TheNewSaint
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1678
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by TheNewSaint »

The Next Steps PDF download is currently being finalized and will be sent to everybody on the TGBMS Mailing List as soon as it is available, which, with a fair wind, should transpire this coming week.
If his audience can be asked to book a movie a week in advance with no commitment that it will be shown, I guess they can also wait 10-14 days for a PDF file consisting of things HE wants THEM to do.
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by Gregg »

Hasn't some court somewhere agreed that indeed a signature must be dated to be valid, but also found that the remey for ones missing said date is to have someone add it?
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 4798
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by longdog »

Gregg wrote: Mon May 06, 2019 7:41 pm Hasn't some court somewhere agreed that indeed a signature must be dated to be valid, but also found that the remey for ones missing said date is to have someone add it?
I think that's pretty much the general attitude that the courts take towards minor procedural, typographic or clerical errors in the civil sphere.

In FootlerLand an error on the part of a bank in getting a mortgage borrower to sign the paperwork means a free house for the lucky punter. In the real world a judge would just say "Sign it or I'll sign it or your behalf".
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8227
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by Burnaby49 »

In FootlerLand an error on the part of a bank in getting a mortgage borrower to sign the paperwork means a free house for the lucky punter. In the real world a judge would just say "Sign it or I'll sign it or your behalf".
Here in Canada it's a very common belief amongst sovereigns that if they refuse to plead at trial, either guilty or not guilty, the court has to let them go. Sadly for that belief judges have statutory authority to make a not guilty plea on a defendant's behalf when they refuse to plea. But they stil keep trying.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
User avatar
grixit
Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
Posts: 4287
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by grixit »

Image
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!

10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
User avatar
Gregg
Conde de Quatloo
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
Location: Der Dachshundbünker

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by Gregg »

Well, everything except expert common law internet legal advice.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
aesmith
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by aesmith »

Gregg wrote: Mon May 06, 2019 7:41 pmHasn't some court somewhere agreed that indeed a signature must be dated to be valid, but also found that the remey for ones missing said date is to have someone add it?
He seems to be punting two arguments here, one is that if the deed isn't witnessed it's not valid. That will be very very unusual as the standard documents all have the witness section. His own was an anomaly, and as you say the court corrected the issue and found the loan agreement still to be effective. The other argument is to do with dates, since the mortgage deed is signed and witnessed prior to the actual transfer of ownership. So it's either dated at a time that the borrower does not own the property, or the date is added later. I'm sure that's been through the courts probably more than once, but I don't know the actual cases.
Footloose52
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:03 pm
Location: No longer on a train

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by Footloose52 »

aesmith wrote: Tue May 07, 2019 7:50 am
Gregg wrote: Mon May 06, 2019 7:41 pmHasn't some court somewhere agreed that indeed a signature must be dated to be valid, but also found that the remey for ones missing said date is to have someone add it?
He seems to be punting two arguments here, one is that if the deed isn't witnessed it's not valid. That will be very very unusual as the standard documents all have the witness section. His own was an anomaly, and as you say the court corrected the issue and found the loan agreement still to be effective. The other argument is to do with dates, since the mortgage deed is signed and witnessed prior to the actual transfer of ownership. So it's either dated at a time that the borrower does not own the property, or the date is added later. I'm sure that's been through the courts probably more than once, but I don't know the actual cases.
All the mortgage deeds I've been involved with in the UK banking system which related to the primary mortgage were completed undated, sent to the solicitors dealing with the purchase and then dated on purchase completion. Second or subsequent mortgage deeds were dated the day they were signed.
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by notorial dissent »

longdog wrote: Mon May 06, 2019 8:59 pm
Gregg wrote: Mon May 06, 2019 7:41 pm Hasn't some court somewhere agreed that indeed a signature must be dated to be valid, but also found that the remey for ones missing said date is to have someone add it?
I think that's pretty much the general attitude that the courts take towards minor procedural, typographic or clerical errors in the civil sphere.

In FootlerLand an error on the part of a bank in getting a mortgage borrower to sign the paperwork means a free house for the lucky punter. In the real world a judge would just say "Sign it or I'll sign it or your behalf".
In the US, there is almost certainly a clause tucked away in every mortgage/loan/DOT/deed called errors and omissions or something to that effect, basically to the effect that if there is an error or omission in the document(s) that the bank/lender has the right to correct it. It is supposed to be explained at the closing, and it certainly was at every one I attended, and as I recall there was something that was initialed saying we had been so advised. I can't believe that the UK is deficient in this little CYA addition to their documents.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
longdog
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 4798
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by longdog »

aesmith wrote: Tue May 07, 2019 7:50 am The other argument is to do with dates, since the mortgage deed is signed and witnessed prior to the actual transfer of ownership. So it's either dated at a time that the borrower does not own the property, or the date is added later. I'm sure that's been through the courts probably more than once, but I don't know the actual cases.
I'm pretty sure I've seen this come up as one of those hopeless "I want a free house" applications to the ombudsman where it was explained to the applicant that the document clearly said it only came into effect once the sale had gone through.

It's hardly unusual for written, signed and dated contracts only to come into effect once everybody had done all the things the contact was an agreement to do... That's rather the whole point of a contract... "I agree to to give sum A to person B when they deliver item C."
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Michael (of Bernicia) Waugh, UK bankster-buster

Post by notorial dissent »

In the US, at least on real estate purchases, there is a rescission period, which means x number of days, 3 or 5 I don't remember which now, during which you can change your mind, if you don't, then the money becomes real and the agreement becomes affective. Otherwise, just so much waste paper. Also, there are deeds that don't come in to effect unless a string of events happen or don't happen. I 'm sure that historically similar things can be found in the UK.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.