Well, apefarms, you know how to describe your own posts. If you knew ANYTHING about the laws and rules of evidence, you would know that there are many exceptions to the hearsay rule. Here's a link which describes them:apefarms wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2019 8:39 am ""Reason [of disaproved post]: Babbling, trolling nonsense. apefarms is, like so many of his type, looking in the wrong place for definitions of legal terms. He uses the Merriam-Webster dictionary version of the term; when even the dulles first-year law student knows that there are many exceptions to the hearsay exclusion rule..""
Irrelevant and nonsense!
But that's ok. I just make a new account - like I've done five times by now.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_803
Any lawyer who offered the Merriam-Webster definition of hearsay, in court, when objecting to the introduction of a certain piece of evidence would not only have their objection swiftly overruled; they would probably be called to the sidebar, and told by the judge not to try a stunt like that again. If they persisted in that level of legal "scholarship", the judge might well refer them to the local bar association, for a determination of their fitness to practice law.