Rekha Patel loses her house
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
The whole bunch seem to be a thackstone short of a full roof.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
You win Quatloos today.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
I read it that she hadn’t told them that she could be imprisoned, suspect it’s a bit difficult to hide that you’ve lost the house they’d paid for....... but then again this is Wreka, so I guess anything is possible!!
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Sadly i fear this will gnaw away at Rekha for the rest of her life. I read from the FB extract someone who remains as obsessed with this as ever, convinced by the fools surrounding her that she’s the victim here, not through her own questionable decisions in doubling down time and again through successive doomed litigation but some conspiracy engineered entirely by the police.
The new owner seems to have dodged the trial having achieved his objective in buying, renovating and possibly spinning on or letting out the property in question. RP, in describing his actions as “amazing” fails entirely to see the irony given the actual outcome of this saga, all reported in the preceding pages above.
The DJ at the trial felt Rekha was sufficiently not guilty to impose a restraining order preventing her from going back to her former home for the next five years.
A sure sign of complete success 11!!11!
Interesting that she appeared to have an actual real solicitor instructed this time to whom she probably owes her acquittal. The other legal geniuses, those behind the “sell your house for a tenner to a trust” gambit, the Tunkashila crew appear to have melted away. I wonder what the actual cost to Patel was arising from their involvement.
So, what next? She reminds me of old Tom C, always just about to unleash a genius legal attack to reverse the clock, restore ownership and send all enemies off to prison. The cunning plan is always big on theatre, short on actual detail and either is never implemented or shown to be the hopeless musings of the truly obsessive.
How sad all this is.
The new owner seems to have dodged the trial having achieved his objective in buying, renovating and possibly spinning on or letting out the property in question. RP, in describing his actions as “amazing” fails entirely to see the irony given the actual outcome of this saga, all reported in the preceding pages above.
The DJ at the trial felt Rekha was sufficiently not guilty to impose a restraining order preventing her from going back to her former home for the next five years.
A sure sign of complete success 11!!11!
Interesting that she appeared to have an actual real solicitor instructed this time to whom she probably owes her acquittal. The other legal geniuses, those behind the “sell your house for a tenner to a trust” gambit, the Tunkashila crew appear to have melted away. I wonder what the actual cost to Patel was arising from their involvement.
So, what next? She reminds me of old Tom C, always just about to unleash a genius legal attack to reverse the clock, restore ownership and send all enemies off to prison. The cunning plan is always big on theatre, short on actual detail and either is never implemented or shown to be the hopeless musings of the truly obsessive.
How sad all this is.
-
- First Mate
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:19 am
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
The new owner was at the trial according to the Daily Heil
The paper described him as an 'estate agent' but he is actually the owner and resident of her ex cottageMr Turner confirmed that he was content parties to remain there. I don't know if Miss Patel was already in there at that time.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
I read back through our posts from last year and as a hive mind we seemed to predict the outcome pretty damn accurately, as in predicting acquittal (it was always a stretch once she'd got real solicitors in).
But let's map out this win. She was arrested and spent 22 hours in a police station. Was ordered to stay away from the property whilst awaiting her court date. Has been further ordered to stay away from the property. No longer has her house. !!!success 1!!
But let's map out this win. She was arrested and spent 22 hours in a police station. Was ordered to stay away from the property whilst awaiting her court date. Has been further ordered to stay away from the property. No longer has her house. !!!success 1!!
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Amusing side line: Given the following statement
The end of the prosecution evidence is then the correct time to ask "No case to answer?"Mr Turner confirmed that he was content parties to remain there. I don't know if Miss Patel was already in there at that time.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Which bit of "You lost" does she have a problem understanding?now the opportunity is there as a ruling in March from he Supreme Court has ruled there is no statute of limitation on FRAUD so watch this space my friends
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
In reality she did win the criminal case. The recurring Freeman fallacy is the belief that being found not guilty of a criminal offence means any prior civil proceedings must be overturned. I expect we'll hear the same fallacy from Mr Bait if he's found NG next month.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2016 7:50 pm
- Location: North of the Watford Gap, UK
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
She presumably is referring to this case:now the opportunity is there as a ruling in March from [t]he Supreme Court has ruled there is no statute of limitation on FRAUD so watch this space my friends
https://www.out-law.com/en/articles/201 ... d-victims/
IANAL. But. It's difficult to see how that applies as the 'fraud' is all in her and her few remaining adherents' minds. IIRC, she has lost all the civil cases brought both by and against her. There's also the problem of funding representation. Part (most?) of the large sum she ended up owing was down to legal costs accumulated on the back of repeatedly losing. She has also lost her main asset.
Who's going to take someone with her history on?
Our future is like that of the passengers on a small pleasure boat sailing quietly above the Niagara Falls, not knowing that the engines are about to fail. James Lovelock.
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
(dramatic musical flourish)
Edward Ellis
(do the flourish thingy again)
Private Equity Lawyer!
(big finish flourish)
Edward Ellis
(do the flourish thingy again)
Private Equity Lawyer!
(big finish flourish)
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1678
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:35 am
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Fraud?
Ignoring the complete lack of merit to Rekha's case for the moment, if she wanted to reclaim ownership of the house, wouldn't that be a civil lawsuit? Or perhaps an appeal of the ruling that took ownership away from her?
Is she really going to file fraud charges against... well, probably the wrong people anyway?
Ignoring the complete lack of merit to Rekha's case for the moment, if she wanted to reclaim ownership of the house, wouldn't that be a civil lawsuit? Or perhaps an appeal of the ruling that took ownership away from her?
Is she really going to file fraud charges against... well, probably the wrong people anyway?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1423
- Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:29 pm
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
There's also the problem of her Extended Civil Restraint Order, expires November 2019, if she starts up again they'll simply slap another Order on her
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Exactly. What actually was the fraud? Someone won a court case against her? How do you actually prove that a court case you lost was fraud, given that presumably you took part, were represented or made the decision not to attend. Unless you have discovered some massive organised conspiracy which you were not previously aware of (which is unlikely since people have been claiming fraud for years) I can not see how this could go anywhere. Plus, as has been said, you will need lots of money for presenting the case.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Pirate
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2017 2:17 pm
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
IANAL, but my reading of the case summary is that it refers to a situation where fraud is discovered after proceedings have concluded.
As I understand it, Patel has been claiming fraud throughout this saga, so the case cited would not apply to her.if the fraud was raised in the earlier proceedings, any application to set aside the judgment may not be entertained.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
I think for the FMOTL types the word "fraud" is considered some sort of magic bullet that can reverse any decision or be used to dispute any sort of liability. There'll be a technical term for her specific case, similar to Woman Neelu's example of the "wrong size numberplate fraud" suffered by her son.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 731
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:20 pm
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Fraud, like treason, is defined as anything they don't like, such as having to pay taxes or repay loans.aesmith wrote: ↑Thu May 23, 2019 10:44 am I think for the FMOTL types the word "fraud" is considered some sort of magic bullet that can reverse any decision or be used to dispute any sort of liability. There'll be a technical term for her specific case, similar to Woman Neelu's example of the "wrong size numberplate fraud" suffered by her son.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:01 pm
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
Don't they have some sort of flowery legal maxim having to do with fraud as a foundation renders everything from it invalid?
I would look it up, but my all important required, Maxims of Law book, has gone missing from my law library.
I would look it up, but my all important required, Maxims of Law book, has gone missing from my law library.
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2016 8:14 am
Re: Rekha Patel loses her house
"Fraud unravels all". But of course that applies to actual fraud, not just mentioning the word.