John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
- Location: Laughing at Tuco
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Personally, I hope he wins in his case against himself. If he wins will he send baliffs to his own home to collect the debt ?
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
I would prefer the opposite. He refuses to acknowledge himself and disavows the debt. He then takes matters into his own hands, beats himself up and gets arrested for assault.Bones wrote:Personally, I hope he wins in his case against himself. If he wins will he send baliffs to his own home to collect the debt ?
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
His intention is to lose and have on the record a debt against him that would (in his small little mind anyhow) later have precedence over any OTHER DEBT that others make take him to court for, and be awarded judgement. In general, unless otherwise provided for in the security agreement, debts reduced to judgement are paid in liquidation in chronological order.
As I said above, its not going to work, for any myriad of reasons, but if nothing else by saying he IS OWED that much money the debt which is a liability to him also becomes an asset to him, that would be subject to liquidation. Followed to a logical, in a Douglas Adams like way, the ASSET could be sold by the liquidator for next to nothing (he can't and isn't going to pay it) but the LIABILITY to pay remains, at face value, and he could end up owing his own bankruptcy estate a quazzillion pounds or however much he says he owes himself.
As I said above, its not going to work, for any myriad of reasons, but if nothing else by saying he IS OWED that much money the debt which is a liability to him also becomes an asset to him, that would be subject to liquidation. Followed to a logical, in a Douglas Adams like way, the ASSET could be sold by the liquidator for next to nothing (he can't and isn't going to pay it) but the LIABILITY to pay remains, at face value, and he could end up owing his own bankruptcy estate a quazzillion pounds or however much he says he owes himself.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:01 pm
- Location: New York, NY
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Foiled by that darn double sided accounting system again.
The Hardest Thing in the World to Understand is Income Taxes -Albert Einstein
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose - As sung by Janis Joplin (and others) Written by Kris Kristofferson and Fred Foster.
-
- Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
double sided like a mobius strip!
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
- Location: Laughing at Tuco
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Anyone have any updates on this one, I could do with a good laugh
-
- J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
There is American precedent for this kind of lawsuit:
http://loweringthebar.net/2011/04/the-m ... mself.html
http://loweringthebar.net/2011/04/the-m ... mself.html
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
really have to remember when reading that site to make sure that ALL beverages are in the upright and locked position, otherwise, goodbye another keyboard.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 4806
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 8:53 am
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Pop over to his Facebook profile for some seriously nasty and obsessive anti-semitic, racist and just plain bizarre shite.Bones wrote:Anyone have any updates on this one, I could do with a good laugh
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012255699040Good morning folks. Did you know that Hitler was right?
And so was Colonel Muammar Gaddafi
WHY? Because they fought The JEWS
It's fuckers like this gobshite who make me want to abandon my life-long atheism and bacon-sandwich-munching and adopt the religion of my grandmothers... Already...
JULIAN: I recommend we try Per verulium ad camphorum actus injuria linctus est.
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
SANDY: That's your actual Latin.
HORNE: What does it mean?
JULIAN: I dunno - I got it off a bottle of horse rub, but it sounds good, doesn't it?
-
- Stern Faced Schoolmaster of Serious Discussion
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2014 7:12 am
- Location: England, UK
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.
Another auto-litigant: a New Zealand City Council prosecuted itself for doing some building work without first getting consent from itself. It pleaded guilty, and was fined. Guess who's coffers the fine went into?
Another auto-litigant: a New Zealand City Council prosecuted itself for doing some building work without first getting consent from itself. It pleaded guilty, and was fined. Guess who's coffers the fine went into?
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
I think I'd prefer Onanistic Litigant.littleFred wrote:Another auto-litigant
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
The Attorney?littleFred wrote:Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.
Another auto-litigant: a New Zealand City Council prosecuted itself for doing some building work without first getting consent from itself. It pleaded guilty, and was fined. Guess who's coffers the fine went into?
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Then there is justice in the world.Gregg wrote:The Attorney?littleFred wrote:Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.
Another auto-litigant: a New Zealand City Council prosecuted itself for doing some building work without first getting consent from itself. It pleaded guilty, and was fined. Guess who's coffers the fine went into?
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2186
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:58 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
A hateful idiot...littleFred wrote:Yes, Mr Paterson's facebook seems even more vitriolic than when I first saw it. He even hates facebook.
"Abel Danger Global Network Dedicated to Uncovering Treasonous Acts Against Humanity"
"don't be hubris ever..." Steve Mccrae, noted legal ExpertInFuckAll.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
This is a cross-post related to Neelu's post of her recent trip to the RCJ. Whilst it was posted by Neelu and has the usual cast of idiots Lee Cant, Edward Ellis etc, the main antagonist is actually John Paterson so it probably needs to be on this thread.
He is charged with contempt for recording in a court during April 2017. The Attorney General has authorised a prosecution. His recent appearance as documented by Neelu appears an attempt to throw FOTLer nonsense at the court and be put on a witness protection programme . His case is on the 14th May.
His defence maybe harmed because according to Neelu's transcript, he plans to use the unorthodox defence of "it is not illegal to record in a court."
He is charged with contempt for recording in a court during April 2017. The Attorney General has authorised a prosecution. His recent appearance as documented by Neelu appears an attempt to throw FOTLer nonsense at the court and be put on a witness protection programme . His case is on the 14th May.
His defence maybe harmed because according to Neelu's transcript, he plans to use the unorthodox defence of "it is not illegal to record in a court."
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
I don't know about unorthodox, but I will go with really really stupid.AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:13 pm This is a cross-post related to Neelu's post of her recent trip to the RCJ. Whilst it was posted by Neelu and has the usual cast of idiots Lee Cant, Edward Ellis etc, the main antagonist is actually John Paterson so it probably needs to be on this thread.
He is charged with contempt for recording in a court during April 2017. The Attorney General has authorised a prosecution. His recent appearance as documented by Neelu appears an attempt to throw FOTLer nonsense at the court and be put on a witness protection programme . His case is on the 14th May.
His defence maybe harmed because according to Neelu's transcript, he plans to use the unorthodox defence of "it is not illegal to record in a court."
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:01 pm
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
John Paterson of late has become enamoured of the fragrant Neelu. They appear to be spending a great deal of time in one another’s company popping down to the RCJ together to file the usual legal gibberish.
Some of you will know from various sources that on his most recent visit the cops had by some devilish subterfuge gained access to the inside of the building. Before you could say “it wuz the Joos wot dun it” they swooped and carted him off to the Funny Farm on a section - which is where he is currently residing.
JP’s case has not been in any way assisted by a succession of fruitcakes calling the hospital claiming to be his friends. This will only have fuelled the case for further treatment and left staff thinking that it’s far madder outside the walls of their institution than in.
So the Wood Chipper man, the Pavement Kisser as he’s also unkindly referred to is still there, his pals in the Sarf London Mob having failed to bust him out, his vacuous buddy Andy Devine thought he’d been bumped off (which would help “wake the Sheeple”) only to appear sheepish himself when the truth rather than the troof emerged.
JP gets written about in other threads here and on Hoaxtead and I struggled with whether to write this update given that he he has been clearly suffering from mental health issues.
But, on balance he’s a despicable shit - fuck ‘im.
It also says something about the subjects of Quatloos FMOTL discussions that they all seem to skirt and ultimately pay a visit to the secure unit.
Some of you will know from various sources that on his most recent visit the cops had by some devilish subterfuge gained access to the inside of the building. Before you could say “it wuz the Joos wot dun it” they swooped and carted him off to the Funny Farm on a section - which is where he is currently residing.
JP’s case has not been in any way assisted by a succession of fruitcakes calling the hospital claiming to be his friends. This will only have fuelled the case for further treatment and left staff thinking that it’s far madder outside the walls of their institution than in.
So the Wood Chipper man, the Pavement Kisser as he’s also unkindly referred to is still there, his pals in the Sarf London Mob having failed to bust him out, his vacuous buddy Andy Devine thought he’d been bumped off (which would help “wake the Sheeple”) only to appear sheepish himself when the truth rather than the troof emerged.
JP gets written about in other threads here and on Hoaxtead and I struggled with whether to write this update given that he he has been clearly suffering from mental health issues.
But, on balance he’s a despicable shit - fuck ‘im.
It also says something about the subjects of Quatloos FMOTL discussions that they all seem to skirt and ultimately pay a visit to the secure unit.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2456
- Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:56 pm
- Location: M3/S Hubble Road, Cheltenham GL51 0EX
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
One enduring mystery related to Mr Woodchipper is what happened outside Southwark Crown Court during Sabine McNeill's trial.
During a lull in proceedings he claimed that he was assaulted, and named a person he was adamant did it. Not only that he went to police and made a complaint. He does appear to have had injuries.
Where is gets mysterious is that his alleged attacker was no-where near him at the time. The SCC precincts are a through-fare for all sorts of people. It is next to HMS Belfast, a market area, a cut-thru for City Hall and short cut from London Bridge station to Tower Bridge. It was also near Christmas and along the Thames there were assorted stalls busily selling tourists Christmas trinkets. It is also well covered by CCTV.
The odd thing is no-one seemed to have seen anything. I wonder if a police review of the tapes showed an unshaven man in a bobble hat punching himself?
During a lull in proceedings he claimed that he was assaulted, and named a person he was adamant did it. Not only that he went to police and made a complaint. He does appear to have had injuries.
Where is gets mysterious is that his alleged attacker was no-where near him at the time. The SCC precincts are a through-fare for all sorts of people. It is next to HMS Belfast, a market area, a cut-thru for City Hall and short cut from London Bridge station to Tower Bridge. It was also near Christmas and along the Thames there were assorted stalls busily selling tourists Christmas trinkets. It is also well covered by CCTV.
The odd thing is no-one seemed to have seen anything. I wonder if a police review of the tapes showed an unshaven man in a bobble hat punching himself?
Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
Looks like I was right then:AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:31 pm The odd thing is no-one seemed to have seen anything. I wonder if a police review of the tapes showed an unshaven man in a bobble hat punching himself?
I would prefer the opposite. He refuses to acknowledge himself and disavows the debt. He then takes matters into his own hands, beats himself up and gets arrested for assault.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2137
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2015 7:30 pm
- Location: Nottingham
Re: John Paterson v. JOHN PATERSON
And your prize is 1m REs plus a bar of Swissindo gold. Don't go crazy with all that money!ArthurWankspittle wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:38 pmLooks like I was right then:AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:31 pm The odd thing is no-one seemed to have seen anything. I wonder if a police review of the tapes showed an unshaven man in a bobble hat punching himself?I would prefer the opposite. He refuses to acknowledge himself and disavows the debt. He then takes matters into his own hands, beats himself up and gets arrested for assault.
Is it SteveUK or STEVE: of UK?????