Man gets 40 years for fake legal filings

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Not sure how Randal Rosado has stayed off the radar. 40 years. Ouch!

FORT MYERS, Fla. (AP) — A Florida man has been sentenced to 40 years in prison for filing numerous fake legal documents against public officials.

Lee County court records show that 45-year-old Randal Rosado was sentenced Friday. He was convicted in July of six counts of unlawful retaliation against public officials and 13 counts of simulating legal process.

https://www.sfchronicle.com/news/crime/ ... psid=mUMHC

As a good Catholic boy, I've learned to be very careful about what I pray for lest it be granted!

As I sit here rotting away in this jail cell in Lee County, Florida, I remain hopeful that God will answer my prayers and send one of His angels in the form of an honest attorney or a news reporter who believes in justice.

http://blog.randyrosado.com/2019/04/11/ ... cf-000275/

[notorial dissent]

Sounds like FL is taking the whole SLP and paper terrorism thing downright seriously. Really bad news for the sovcits and fraudsters out there. Sounds like "Legal Bears" and ATW was the opening shot and they are going for serious from there on. FL is going to be a bad place for dumb sovcits I 'd say.

[Jeffrey]

I'll make the obligatory comment about some murderers getting a lot less than 40 years.

[AndyK]

From the background stories, seems like he's more (less?) than a sovereignoramus.

Looks like he's a low level grifter who found a new con to ploy: Home title fraud and theft.

I guess when it all hit the fan, he went all sovereign / religious to weasel out.

[Gregg]

I'll make the obligatory comment about some murderers getting a lot less than 40 years.

I can't even think of what you might be saying there?

[Jeffrey]

Jokes aside, it looks like he was running a carbon copy of ATW's scam. He even name drops Yahweh, I wonder if there's a link.

[ArthurWankspittle]

Sounds like FL is taking the whole SLP and paper terrorism thing downright seriously. Really bad news for the sovcits and fraudsters out there. Sounds like "Legal Bears" and ATW was the opening shot and they are going for serious from there on. FL is going to be a bad place for dumb sovcits I 'd say.

Also see Terry Trussell.

[fortinbras]

He will probably serve a lot less than 40 years, getting released when the prisons become too overcrowded with violent offenders. His crime is very similar to what the 'militia' and the Montana Freemen were doing more than 30 years ago, with bogus liens and make-believe arrest warrants; somehow he neglected to consider the punishments that were handed out back then. I would not be very surprised if he tries to file more bogus liens from his prison cell.

[notorial dissent]

Sounds like FL is taking the whole SLP and paper terrorism thing downright seriously. Really bad news for the sovcits and fraudsters out there. Sounds like "Legal Bears" and ATW was the opening shot and they are going for serious from there on. FL is going to be a bad place for dumb sovcits I 'd say.

Also see Terry Trussell.

Yes, musn't forget TT, who???, they threw the book at him too and his was mostly SLP with a little sovcit thrown in to add more color and stupid to the broth. FL has too many people and too many loons to take this lightly anymore. The SLP damages the courts and the fake legal documents is expensive to deal with and correct so they can do a lot of damage that was as well. The liens against public officials and court officers often require a lot of judicial time and money to clear them, although some states have adopted laws that drastically streamline the process.

[The Observer]

Another article with more details on Rosado's scam:

https://www.newsweek.com/randal-rosado- ... en-1459274

The attorney named as the preparer of the false documents identified himself as part of a law firm called the Reichmann Group. On the firm's website, a disclaimer at the bottom reads: "The Reichmann Group is not a public law firm or a member of any state's private Bar Association."

Nichols testified that the group is not licensed to offer legal services in any state. The attorney who was listed as having prepared the false documents, in fact, himself "appears to be a fictitious person." The website of the "International Court of Commerce" was further revealed to have been created by Rosado, and the website's domain is registered to his wife. The court appears to have been a product of Rosado's imagination.

I am wondering if this is the "Joel Soucy" whom Rosado claims was the "real" perpetrator behind the International Court of Commerce filings.

[notorial dissent]

Just gets better and better.

[SteveUK]

What an amzing win.

[khmacdowell]

This case is very Florida. Seems like this guy was a businessman cosplayer. Much less unhinged in the olden days, but still comports with conspiracist financial scams

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOqULfyYRUE

Has a lot of canned professional looking online assets, some of which are now broken links.

http://trustconsultingservices.com/

He and his wife write self-help books. She's apparently a 9/11 survivor and includes her experience in her writing

https://www.amazon.com/Pursuing-Your-De ... 00E6TBR4E/

Strong evidence of view-botting given the number of views vs. interaction

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YD2EZxI54p8

I guess he had to up the scam level when the early attempts didn't take off.

[Gregg]

Welcome to Quatloos!

[khmacdowell]

Welcome to Quatloos!

Thanks! My nearly finished master's thesis is in the broader topic of legal anthropology, and these kinds of scams/beliefs/delusions are both legally and anthropologically interesting. I assume some Maritime Officers of the Court employed by the corporation and trained in LEGAL studies post here and know well that jurisprudents have long debated what exactly makes law "law," and sovcits definitely blur the lines within their own minds. Just as example, religious and international "law" are codified and formal, but not particularly enforceable, while teachers in the language arts may well not codify their grading scheme for a paper but can enforce grades by fiat, so the fact that simple classifiers like "formally codified" and "enforceable" by themselves aren't enough makes subtle distinctions in the forms of law across cultures and time makes it an interesting question. Sovcits make it more interesting by dogmatically holding to beliefs that without exception constantly run them afoul of what is accepted by everyone else as "the law," and also both view the legal system in their country as illegitimate but attempt to follow (comically incorrect) conceptions of those systems' own rules to beat them.

So of course, when I noticed Randy Rosado progressed through a few obvious stages, spiraling inexorably downward, as he sought to become a successful author and businessman, I decided to see what evidence beared on his path towards illegal corporate detention, and the treasure trove of rabbit holes here was irresistible.

On Rosado, both his companies and legitimate companies with legitimate positions show up on Zoominfo; it seems he started by just fabricating credentials, then moved on to just defrauding people directly.

https://www.zoominfo.com/people/Randy/Rosado

Sovcitizenry seems to start most commonly when people have revocations, expired tags, delinquent tickets, and so on, because they want to find loopholes (or perhaps just legitimate means, at first) that allow them to keep living their lives the exact same way with no troublesome interruptions. Randy seems to be of the less common, but sweeter and juicier, white collar sovcit cultivar.

[Gregg]

Well, glad to have you, but you obviously have a lot to learn about what makes law, law, as you put it.

Nunc pro Tunc, Pizza, Pizza and of course, the all powerful Pancake and Bacon Writ at the Denny's Supreme People's Common Law Court would be a good place to start. No begone, and come back when you're ready to take the Bar Exam/Silverware Rolling Qualification.

[Gregg]

Cut and pasted from a few other posts, a Quatloos Welcome and Guidelines post, from me, and more or less recognized as not at all official but still helpful.

As is my custom, I am posting what I think, as a long, long time contributor/moderator of this site. That doesn't mean its the official Quatloos policy, I'm not one of the people who can go off all by myself and make policy. That said, I've been saying what I'm gonna say here again, and in 10 years + no one of any importance has had any serious disagreement with it. Your results may vary, offer not open to employees, associates, interns, Virgin Island Gunsmiths or residents of Iowa, Somalia, North Korea or American Samoa.


Someone, I am told, has been complaining about what they are allowed to post, how some moderators have responded to their PMs and have demanded to see a copy of "The Rules".

We don't have rules. There is no parliamentary procedure for what is allowed and not allowed, and what one person may post and it be allowed, honestly, could be not allowed from another poster. There is no set policy for how many warnings you get, how long you might be on moderated status, or anything, really. If you don't like it, tough, I feel your pain. (no, I don't actually)

The purpose of this site is to serve as a resource on scams, a reference on people who runs scams, and a central information source to people, in and out of official positions in government, on scams. We have, as regulars, some of the most knowledgeable people in the subject that I have seen anywhere and also, you might notice, we have quite a few people who have been contributing to the site for a long time.

We make fun of people, some of the people we cover practically beg us to. We are, considering our stated purpose and subject, a pretty light hearted forum. But what we ain't, and ain't ever gonna let anyone make us, is a place where "internet fights" break out, with back and forth bickering and ego swinging...so if you can't get along with someone, I cordially invite you to get lost. If what you're posting is to "win the argument" please don't. If you can't keep it civil, then this isn't the place for you. That's a good start to our "standards", which is how I prefer to look at what some call rules.

Standards, as opposed to rules, are not codified, they are what we, or any individual mod may think they are at any given time. A US Supreme Court Justice, Potter Stewart, was once asked to define what pornography was. His reply, "I can't say, but I know it when I see it" one of my favorite quotes.
Another fave, BTW, when told he was being blackmailed, and the toll could eventually climb to $1 million, when a million was a lot of money...

"We could get that, I know where a million could be got,,, in cash,,,, but it would be wrong" Richard M Nixon

So, just know this as regards rules. I can't say. But I know it when I see it. Also, if another mod makes a decision, don't go looking for another to reverse it, this isn't the NFL, there is no replay rule. Even if a wrong decision is made, unless its especially egregious, I'm not going to second guess it, and doubt anyone else would.

And if you don't like it, well, the complaint department is open from midnight to 12:08 AM EDT, in Manchester New Hampshire, you must apply in person and have an appointment, which can only be scheduled after an in person interview, for which an appointment is needed. This is not a democracy. We are, as most should know, run by a benevolent dictatorship established under the aegis of the International Royal Illuminati Cabal, and your continued presence here is at the pleasure of our staff.

Now, we return you to our regular programming schedule...


GBE

It is a cliche, although mostly true, that the surest way to start an argument is to start talking about religion or politics. As the site is not set up for either topic and as the site is also actively trying to maintain certain standards of civility, we don't allow it. It does, I admit, come close to a rule, but not quite.

Yep, no rules, just standards. I know it when I see it. I will freely admit that a lot of posters go occasionally off topic and we tolerate it, especially if the poster is being civil, points given for clever wit, Douglas Adams references, and much more strictly enforced on people with a habit of making an ass of themselves. I am qualified to classify remarks as to whether they constitute a flame war, you can tell by the green (or red) typeface, maybe someday you too will be able to make the grown up decisions.

No rules, just standards. Part of the reason I like that better is if we had real rules, there are some asshats who would make a career of posting things that met the letter of a rule while at the same time making a mockery of the spirit of the rule, much like accountants and lawyers do for a living (isn't it ironic that a site that is primarily for accountants and lawyers is so governed?) and, well, we just won't have that. Like I have said, ad infinitum, I know it when I see it.

As I have also said, or maybe I didn't and if I haven't I will now, you are more than welcome to disagree, and take your contributions elsewhere. Now, don't make me call Webhick and unleash her, you have to trust me when I say, you probably wouldn't like that. I'm a kitten compared to her.

Okay?

This bit is a reply to someone who tried to debate how many rules there are in a place I said didn't have rules, he was violating one my more adamant guidelines "Don't be a dick"

My finger wagging, as it were, was an attempt to find a nicer way to say "don't be a wanker", and as I thought I made clear, my statements about no rules were my own and NOT any official policy of the board, and were an explanation of how I, not anyone else, just me, makes decisions with regard to moderating the forum. Apparently, you're too thick to understand what I'm about. Sometimes it is painfully obvious to me that some people either don't get it, which I think you do truth be known, and those who do get it, but just have to pick and bitch about something.

I make arbitrary decisions, and in this very tiny little corner of existence, my arbitrary decisions are pretty much the final decisions. Get used to it or get going, I've been here 10 years and you're just barely annoying enough to notice in the grand scheme of things.

Now, can we please get back to what we were discussing?

And finally, the most up to date clarification of the explanation of the interpretation of the situation....

Welcome to Quatloos!

We're getting so many new posters I may have to make a standard Welcome message with Orientation Instructions and all that piddling paperwork.

But I haven't yet, so Ill just copy paste the stuff I wrote earlier for someone else. We don't have rules, per se*, but Guidelines. Such as they are, this kind of sums them up....even if I did write it for someone else. Quit whining, you're lucky to get any Guidelines at all...

Come for the FMOTL, stay for the PLD and Lawful Rebellion! And if you're into this madness, don't overlook the UK and Canadian sections even if you're not English and don't know squat about Hockey or Molson's Beer. (that's your first of hopefully many inside jokes you'll find here) I find it one of the most entertaining sections of the Forum, England has so many wonderfully mad people these days.

Guidelines for new people:
Douglas Adams puns and clues get extra credit, don't be a dick, back up fantastic claims with credible evidence and have fun! Also, no Doxxing.

* Okay, some people a few years ago screwed up so bad that we did have to get 2 real for honest rules, No Politics, No Religion. No Quarter given on those two. Also, especially relevant for our UK readers, we don't break that funny law you have over there about information in an ongoing criminal case. Being in America we don't think we HAVE to follow this rule, but we do because we follow our own guideline about not being dicks.

Thus endeth the lesson.

[Burnaby49]

Well, glad to have you, but you obviously have a lot to learn about what makes law, law, as you put it.

Nunc pro Tunc, Pizza, Pizza and of course, the all powerful Pancake and Bacon Writ at the Denny's Supreme People's Common Law Court would be a good place to start. No begone, and come back when you're ready to take the Bar Exam/Silverware Rolling Qualification.

Gregg, have you any understanding of real law? Your explanation is wildly off the mark in respect to legal writs from Denny's. We all know they must be authorized by at least a medium serving of the hash browns.

[Gregg]

Well, glad to have you, but you obviously have a lot to learn about what makes law, law, as you put it.

Nunc pro Tunc, Pizza, Pizza and of course, the all powerful Pancake and Bacon Writ at the Denny's Supreme People's Common Law Court would be a good place to start. No begone, and come back when you're ready to take the Bar Exam/Silverware Rolling Qualification.

Gregg, have you any understanding of real law? Your explanation is wildly off the mark in respect to legal writs from Denny's. We all know they must be authorized by at least a medium serving of the hash browns.

Depends totally on how you look at it.

You can make a Civil charge of Capital Treason over $4 Gazongazillion (Canadian $) without the Hash Browns PROVIDED THAT the case in question is not Admiralty Common Law on Land, AND ALSO does not have any element which might be touched upon by Chancery, and OTHERWISE enforceable by High Court Dachshund Marshall Deputies. BUT in such a case, I will admit, you MUST also provide the Puperoni for the Wiener Dogs, if such and same are involved.

[Gregg]

and just a few posts ago, someone was saying a 40 year sentence in this case was ridiculous. We showed him, dinna we?