viewtopic.php?f=46&t=9713&hilit=fiscal+arbitrators
viewtopic.php?f=46&t=9443&hilit=fiscal+arbitrators
viewtopic.php?f=46&t=9396&p=158492&hili ... rs#p158492
Until now the Canada Revenue Agency has gone after taxpayers who submitted false returns based on Fiscal Arbitrator's instructions but a news link sent to me by a Quatloos lurker indicated that the CRA is now going after the individuals behind Fiscal Arbitrators;
http://blogs.windsorstar.com/2013/02/21 ... cial-ruin/
A very interesting article. It gives numerous examples of basically small-time taxpayers who fell for Fiscal Arbitrators line and are ending up bankrupt because of it. The CRA is imposing VERY heavy penalties on them. In the case of the two individuals interviewed for the article;
What I really loved was the explanation to suckers as to why they didn't have to pay any tax. A loophole that nobody but Fiscal Arbitrators had noticed!;The couple did it, and Pare’s bank records show a $16,000 refund, although Wright’s was denied. It turned out she was lucky – the Canada Revenue Agency reassessed the couple and slapped them with a total of $125,000 in gross negligence penalties and the amount of Pare’s refund, saying the couple should have known the tax preparation method was illegal since they had filed their returns normally in the past.
Even though Wright didn’t get a refund, the CRA is still sending her bills for about $46,000 as a penalty for attempting to evade taxes. Pare owes the penalty on top of his refund, with the CRA demanding about $79,000.
However it went past the pretence that personal expenses were tax deductible under Fiscal Arbitrator's interpretation of the Income Tax Act. As the cases in the links cited above show most of the expenses claimed as deductible business expenses were just numbers made up by Fiscal Arbitrators with nothing behind them at all.According to a document produced by the Fiscal Arbitrators and sent to clients, which was obtained by The Star, the theory behind their tax preparation method is that because the Income Tax Act defines a business as an “undertaking of any kind whatever,” all Canadian taxpayers are technically business owners. The Fiscal Arbitrators took that as justification for claiming personal expenses as business losses to trigger refunds and even recommended clients argue this interpretation of the act in court if challenged by the CRA, according to emails and documents obtained by The Star.
“The [Income Tax Act] is extremely vague and definitely open to interpretation,” the Fiscal Arbitrators’ explanatory document reads. “It has always been acceptable practice for a taxpayer to arrange their affairs in such a manner as to reduce or eliminate the taxes otherwise payable as long as it is lawful and complies.”