We the People and Bob Schulz petition to SCOTUS denied

Dezcad · Post by **Dezcad** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:11 pm

The SCOTUS denied both We the People and Bob Schulz' petition for writ of certiorari today at p. 22 of the SCOTUS order.

On a side note, p. 22 of the SCOTUS order also denies Peter Hendrickson's petition in a Summons case.

Disilloosianed · Post by **Disilloosianed** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:19 pm

I'll be interested in seeing how long THAT takes to make it to the WTP website "Updates."

Nikki · Post by **Nikki** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:42 pm

It will appear the very second Bob figures out some way to spin it into a request for donations.

Post by **webhick** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:29 pm

Nikki wrote:It will appear the very second Bob figures out some way to spin it into a request for donations.

Edit: Removed mock release.

ASITStands · Post by **ASITStands** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:24 pm

Hendrickson, Peter E appears on the same page.

So, the petition for certiorari on the summons case is denied?

How long will it take to make the newsletter? Or, the forum?

Dezcad · Post by **Dezcad** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:07 pm

ASITStands wrote:Hendrickson, Peter E appears on the same page.

So, the petition for certiorari on the summons case is denied?

How long will it take to make the newsletter? Or, the forum?

I posted PH's denial of cert at viewtopic.php?t=1821

Nikki · Post by **Nikki** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 11:46 pm

Dezcad wrote:
ASITStands wrote:Hendrickson, Peter E appears on the same page.

So, the petition for certiorari on the summons case is denied?

How long will it take to make the newsletter? Or, the forum?
I posted PH's denial of cert at viewtopic.php?t=1821

The question relates to the LoserHeads forum. But it's irrelevant -- as soon as it's posted, some mysterious administrator will delete it, ban the person who posted it, and initiate a flame war against everyone who read it.

ASITStands · Post by **ASITStands** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:54 am

Dezcad wrote:
ASITStands wrote:Hendrickson, Peter E appears on the same page.

So, the petition for certiorari on the summons case is denied?

How long will it take to make the newsletter? Or, the forum?
I posted PH's denial of cert at viewtopic.php?t=1821

Didn't see it. Do now.

Post by **Famspear** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:25 am

The question relates to the LoserHeads forum

I'm not familiar with this case. Was this by any chance for enforcement of an IRS summons to obtain name & address information about the wackos who post at losthorizons.com? Was it a summons for names & addresses of people who bought Pete's materials?

Post by **LPC** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:31 am

Famspear wrote:I'm not familiar with this case. Was this by any chance for enforcement of an IRS summons to obtain name & address information about the wackos who post at losthorizons.com?

Nope.

Famspear wrote:Was it a summons for names & addresses of people who bought Pete's materials?

Also nope.

From Tax Protester Dossiers:

The IRS also served summonses on a number of different banks seeking financial records of Hendrickson's accounts at those banks. Hendrickson filed petitions in federal court to quash the summonses, but every one of his petitions have been denied. Peter E. Hendrickson v. United States, No. 3:2006mc00008 (U.S.D.C. E.D. Va. 5/8/2006) (petition denied; Capital One Bank ordered to comply with summons); Peter E. Hendrickson v. United States, No. 8:2006cv00345 (U.S.D.C. Neb. 10/4/2006) (petition denied); Peter E. Hendrickson v. United States, No. 2:2006x 50394 (U.S.D.C. E.D. Mich. 6/2/2006) (petition denied), affirmed, No. 06-1870 (6th Cir. 4/10/2007), rehearing denied, 8/8/2007, cert. denied, No. 07-624 (1/7/2008); Peter E. Hendrickson v. United States, No. 2:2006x 50396 (U.S.D.C. E.D. Mich. 6/29/2006) (petition denied), affirmed, No. 07-1144 (10/2/2007 6th Cir.), rehearing denied (11/30/2007); Peter E. Hendrickson v. United States, No. 5:2006mc80094 (U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. 7/18/2006) (petition to quash summons directed at EBAY/PayPal denied), affirmed, No. 06-56129 (9th Cir. 8/13/2007).

Post by **Famspear** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:47 am

Thanks, Dan.

Also, I'm clearly getting old. I just checked, and I already had this (including the essential materials from the PACER site for the District Court) in my Windows Explorer folder -- I had just forgotten about it.

Post by **notorial dissent** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:48 am

[initiate sarcasm mode]
Well color me shocked and amazed at the gross miscarriage of justice. Schulz can be righteously indignant about it now.

. · Post by . » Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:11 am

names & addresses of people who bought Pete's materials?

Not directly, but this:

Peter E. Hendrickson v. United States, No. 5:2006mc80094 (U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. 7/18/2006) (petition to quash summons directed at EBAY/PayPal denied), affirmed, No. 06-56129 (9th Cir. 8/13/2007).

probably gave them a good percentage of the people who purchased his junk.

Post by **LPC** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:48 am

Famspear wrote:Also, I'm clearly getting old. I just checked, and I already had this (including the essential materials from the PACER site for the District Court) in my Windows Explorer folder -- I had just forgotten about it.

I sent out an email today to two people asking where I could find a document that, about an hour later, I accidentally (and coincidentally) discovered I already had in my possession.

So, to the two of them, and to all others to whom I may send emails in the future about needed/missing documents, I say: nevermind.

Post by **Demosthenes** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:54 am

Famspear wrote:Also, I'm clearly getting old. I just checked, and I already had this (including the essential materials from the PACER site for the District Court) in my Windows Explorer folder -- I had just forgotten about it.

LPC wrote: I sent out an email today to two people asking where I could find a document that, about an hour later, I accidentally (and coincidentally) discovered I already had in my possession.

I did the same thing this morning when I posted a now deleted thread on Q looking for a photo of Doug Rosile.

Webhick, knock it off.

Post by **webhick** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:00 am

Demosthenes wrote:Webhick, knock it off.

Sorry.

Post by **LPC** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:21 am

Demosthenes wrote:Webhick, knock it off.

Knock what off?

Post by **LPC** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:28 am

webhick wrote:
Demosthenes wrote:Webhick, knock it off.
Sorry. :(

For what?

I feel like a child whose parents are fighting and I don't know why.

(Not that I think of Demo as a mother, or webhick as a mother, or that there are any oedipal feelings, no sirree. But I won't reject any physically and age-appropriate comforting. :lol: )

Post by **webhick** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:31 am

LPC wrote:
webhick wrote:
Demosthenes wrote:Webhick, knock it off.
Sorry.
For what?

I assume it has to do with the mock release I put in earlier in the thread (I've since edited it out). Won't do it again.

Post by **Demosthenes** » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:18 pm

I assume it has to do with the mock release I put in earlier in the thread (I've since edited it out). Won't do it again.

Nothing so deep. When weird things start happening all at once (Famspear, LPC, and I all sharing a senior moment), it just must be Webhick misusing her Illuminati skills for mischief. No other explanation is rational.