That's exactly the same text as posted on the 4th. Which is helpfully situated right next to the 'latest update'.Hot off the press from Mr W saying, wait for it ... nothing's happened since the last update ..
He's not even trying now...
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
That's exactly the same text as posted on the 4th. Which is helpfully situated right next to the 'latest update'.Hot off the press from Mr W saying, wait for it ... nothing's happened since the last update ..
Jonathan Trapman
19th December
A passer by in FB terms has instigated this update from me to all the loyal followers and eager-to-hear-what-is-next crowds.
"Willi ,What I am posting is the course of the court case in process. So suddenly there comes a lull in updates and all I see around the place is the Spanish Inquisition. Now admittedly no one expects the Spanish Inquisition but to be fair if there is bugger all to report, then that is what people get!
Now I could have posted all sorts of filling stuff, yet that again would trigger the "I want updates that feed my bitten-to-the-core nails" crowd.
Well Willi I appreciate your expectation and thus I am deigning to reply in a way that reassures and at the same time recognises that there is nothing public to report. One thing I can say with certainty is that when I do have something of substance we'll see it here first!
You see in the world of taking governments down you can appreciate we have all sorts of hurdles placed in front of us. These hurdles, far from being barriers, have acted as incentives to go deeper and more solidly in what we are doing. One thing to make abundantly clear is that we have them on the run, making mistakes you would only expect from a kindergarten law school. Now we could have jumped on that and proceeded as we saw best. Yet what transpired from that was an opportunity to go so deep as to utterly destroy the last vestiges of any resistance from not only the UK process but more importantly from a global process that will collapse accordingly.
It is imperative for people to comprehend that what started out as a UK take down has transpired into a journey that will, by its very effect take down the whole pile of vermin posing as power.
What goes on around Europe is totally co-ordinated with our process. They are utterly aware that what we are instigating will support their efforts that can be seen as opening the public collective mind to the the utter deception played on us all.
When you are breaking a dam you target the most vulnerable spots so that gentle , or not so gentle weakening leads to the total collapse.
It may not give the time and date explosive effect people have embedded in their minds as Zero Point but rest assured, the minds and efforts of the few will most certainly lead us to the Common Law Era we all look towards, that era of Freedom, peace and harmony
Lastly Willi as someone who is not joined as a friend or friend of a friend I appreciate your question that has drawn me to this in depth update I had previously not given!
There's a long rant about the Simon Dolan caseOver the course of the past month, we have amassed a plethora of prima facie evidence, which proves that the defendants in the Private Criminal Prosecution are responsible for COVID-1984 and are guilty of multiple acts of pandemic fraud.
Whilst we are more than confident that we now have enough evidence to justify the issue of either a warrant or a summons, we are still waiting for key FOI responses, which are due to be received no later than today.
In the event we receive the responses due, we will be aiming to lay the new information before Christmas. If all the key the responses don’t come in, we will be forced to wait until the new year.
Note the fact that the final paragraph is a long way from the supreme confidence he was exhibiting earlier in this saga. The references to Common Law are a bit confusing. While I originally thought that where he'd mentioned CL previously he was preparing the ground for his referring the matter to the Play Court, from context here, that doesn't seem to be the case....No wonder Dolan spurned both my constructive criticism and my offer of collaboration, before proceeding to attempt to discredit our case on social media, on the fallacious ground that there was no such thing as a Private Criminal Prosecution, despite the fact that I ran one myself in the summer of 2013, alleging multiple breaches of the Fraud Act 2006.
Our Most Realistic Chance
Secondly, in the criminal domain, when there is sufficient prima facie evidence that proves indictable offences, such as fraud, have been committed, a single district judge decides whether the case is properly pleaded, with or without a hearing.
Whereas, in the civil courts, judges allow hearsay evidence that is inadmissible in the criminal courts, whilst they effectively preside as the sole arbiter of whether justice is done; which, my own direct and indirect experience has taught me, very rarely occurs in the civil domain.
Furthermore, in the event a summons or warrant is issued by a criminal court, the case then proceeds to a pleading hearing, before a trial is listed and the evidence is presented to a jury, which decides whether the defendants are innocent or guilty.
In the most simplistic terms possible, it is much harder to control the outcome of a decision made by a Common Law Jury, than it is to control a civil decision, which money almost always decides.
Suitably Cautious Optimism
However, even though we are much more likely to succeed by relying upon the ancient Common Law Jury Trial to see that justice is done, don’t for one moment think that I’m not fully availed of the certainty that the establishment was always going to do everything it could to derail the PCP, just as the banksters tried to do when I took them on and won, albeit after a nine year war of attrition.
Suffice to say, this occasion is no different in many respects. I am therefore well versed in decisively dealing with the predictable strategies of my adversaries, none of whom ever foresee even the remotest possibility that they will suffer the humiliating defeats they always incur in the end, as much of the content on this blog unequivocally affirms.
Having said that, I can’t guarantee what the eventual outcome will be at this precise juncture, but I’m cautiously optimistic enough to guarantee that the Private Criminal Prosecution we are running is the last remedy standing under the Common Law and that we will not relent in our struggle until justice is done, freedom is restored and our children’s future is secured, irrespective of the seemingly insurmountable problems we appear to face.
Mention of Waugh's 'top legal team' has been conspicuously absent of late. Again, one wonders if they ever had any existence outside his head.Mr Philip Havers QC and Mr Francis Hoar (instructed by Wedlake Bell) for the Appellant
I think one clue to this lies in the name of the company responsible for the “coruscating” epic that was TGBMS namely “Anarco-Film Productions”.Is Waugh an anarchist? I'd argue not
He probably thinks he's an anarchist just as he thinks he's a legal mastermind. And that TGBMS is 'The Most Talked About British Documentary Feature Film Of The Century'.I think one clue to this lies in the name of the company responsible for the “coruscating” epic that was TGBMS namely “Anarco-Film Productions”.
Puts a slightly different spin than was presumably indented on this, from 14 Feb 2020:we can bet our bum cheeks that justice is now nigh on impossible to obtain in the civil courts, so our only realistic remedy is the Common Law Jury Trial.
https://www.thebernician.net/tgbms-clas ... registrar/Whatever our increasingly desperate detractors will tell you, the TGBMS Class Actions are moving forward, with claims the banksters will never have the opportunity to defend.
It goes on and on like this for 69 pages. I wonder if O'Bonkers' right wing nut job supporters have read it.From an energy perspective, in the previous section “the past”, we see that a pseudo masculine patriarchal energy appears to dominate the actions of the past manmade systems, and the energies of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” were enforced and in play, and commerce tended to play out and observe these ancient and now obsolete beliefs and manmade energies; In fact lady justice atop most commercial court buildings, wore and still wears a blindfold over her eyes, whilst she held the scales of dan/libra, indicating that the manmade law within the building is blind to the feminine energies of justice; This manmade law used in such buildings and systems is obviously flawed, when the natural feminine energies of forgiveness, compassion, justice, love and giving are sacrificed to uphold the laws for commerce; And when these natural feminine energies are hidden, ignored and cast aside, that manmade system with its unnatural flaws, has an obvious finite time span; Creation, whether natural or manmade, requires the merging and union of the feminine and masculine energies for balance and longevity; An imbalance in either energies when merged causes an obvious finite time span;
69 pages of utter twaddle, no problem with his supporters bridling about it as they’ll never read it and by and large it doesn’t mean anything. The core concepts could be covered in two pages, the problem being that they could be demolished in less than one! Padding (or stuffing in this case) makes it look as though it might actually mean something, it doesn’t.AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 9:40 am For a laugh, I thought I'd have a look at the iLien "whitepaper".
natural or manmade, requires the merging and union of the feminine and masculine energies for balance and longevity; An imbalance in either energies when merged causes an accident"..................
It goes on and on like this for 69 pages. I wonder if O'Bonkers' right wing nut job supporters have read it.
Pure gibberish. And another thing they don't believe in... full stops
I think a lot of that is "Emperor's New Clothes" syndrome.TheRambler wrote: ↑Sun Dec 27, 2020 5:23 pm It’s a bit of a mystery how he manages to avoid prosecution.
Aside from the parapolitical stuff, where he could be argued to be promoting terrorism, I can't see what he could be prosecuted for. Afaik, for all his bluster he never takes part in any street actions; not covid conspiracy marches, nor attempts to prevent evictions. While he is promoting the incomprehensible ilien, it's not clear that he would actually benefit if people were daft enough to buy it, and even if he were, given that they don't pretend they're selling anything other than cryptocurrency, are they committing any offence? (genuine question) No self videoed traffic stops, no troubles with the Council Tax people, no run ins with the cops over corona. In fact, when you start to set it out, you realise what an apparently law abiding 'anarchist' he is.It’s a bit of a mystery how he manages to avoid prosecution.
I would have thought either a breach of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017; or failing to register by the 16th December with the Financial Conduct Authority.
Iliening towards the obvious there.Must. Resist. Urge. To. Write. "Come on, iLien".
I refer my learned friend to my previous submissionnotorial dissent wrote: ↑Mon Dec 28, 2020 1:02 pm The burning question is, are the people he has conned smart enough or aware enough to know/realize that they have in fact been conned???? The fact of them listening to him in the first place argues against that.
The conned would have to admit that they were conned by such a transparent con that they would look stupid trying to explain it at the front desk of a police station.
Presumably these would relate to the selling of iliens. But I'm not convinced that Waugh has a direct stake in that project. The style of the 'whitepaper' isn't like his, and he only gets a passing mention in the footnotes, where TGBMS is cited as a source. Given the size of Waugh's ego, I'd expect any enterprise where he was the guiding hand to prominently feature him (with the obligatory 'see my lush and radiant locks' photo).either a breach of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017; or failing to register by the 16th December with the Financial Conduct Authority.