Waugh posted another update on 27/2/21
https://www.thebernician.net/covid-1984 ... t-of-case/
It starts with another set of excuses as to why nothing has actually happened.
First and foremost, the final draft of the statement of case is currently being reviewed, whilst we wait for several expert witness statements to be executed and returned to us. Once we have received them, the papers will be laid and there are no further foreseeable hold-ups on the horizon.
Nevertheless, patience may still be required because it could take days or even weeks for the court’s legal department to assess the papers, before the applications are put before a judge, who will then decide whether we have cited enough prima facie evidence to proceed.
He's added to the cast of imaginary characters who are working with him on it.
Moreover, in the opinion of the former CID fraud detective I am working with, our case is the “dynamite” which will blow the lid off the scamdemic worldwide, simply because all of the arguments are sustained by utterly compelling evidence, most of which is a matter of public record.
Apparently some people have expressed doubts about his veracity and motivations.
As for the small band of so-called “long term truthers”, who are currently telling people I am a government operative on social media and that nothing is going to come of the case, the truth of their false and defamatory slurs, with which I never engage, will soon unmask them as the gobshites, shills and fools they are – Twooth-Feckers, by another name.
Some of you reading this, who didn’t witness exactly the same thing happening during my family’s long running dispute with Bank of Scotland, can watch The Great British Mortgage Swindle, to see for yourselves that I’ve long since proven I don’t talk the talk, without walking the walk.
But that didn’t stop the Twooth-Feckers from claiming I was just a government stooge, making everything up about the three cases I ran against BOS and its receivers, from 06/08/2010 to 21/07/2014, in Newcastle and Leeds High Courts, the Property Chamber and the Land Registry, which resulted in summary judgment being handed down in our favour and two fraudulent mortgages being removed from the charges register.
Somewhat economical with the truth there, aren't you, Mr O'B? As indeed you are in the claims that follow.
Furthermore, anybody who has read everything I have published online about the various legal battles I have had is incapable of honestly claiming I am a shill, given that I have publicly documented each case I have argued and won, as it happened, whether in or out of court, over the course of the last thirteen years, giving away all the legal remedies I devised for free.
By publicly documented, you mean made an unsubstantiated claim, don't you?
How did devising and implementing a remedy for refusing to register a birth benefit the plan to enslave our children as future taxpayers?
No evidence that this happened has been produced.
How did cancelling my registration as a taxpayer benefit the financing of illegal wars against other people’s children, as well as this infernal scamdemic?
That was a new one to me, but the 'evidence' is an edited talk given in 2010, where MoB's side of the correspondence is quoted at interminable length with dreadful background music, but no correspondence from HMRC is divulged.
How did inventing and implementing the three letter conditional acceptance process to get rid of any fraudulent credit cards benefit the powers that shouldn’t be?
This old chestnut?
How did proving mortgage fraud in the high court and starting a class action to cancel 11.2 million illegal charges benefit the banksters who pull the strings of the political puppets in Whitehall?
And how's that 'class action' going?
How did producing, directing and releasing a 5 star hit documentary feature film about institutionalised mortgage fraud benefit the establishment?
To be fair, the film does exist. The metrics that make it a 'five star hit' are, shall we say, opaque.
How did founding and developing a government free jurisdiction for indigenous peoples, under international law, benefit the UK Government?
And now we've left reality far, far behind us and we're firmly in folie de grandeur territory.
He closes with this supposed quote from 'one of our crack team of legal scholars and researchers' about his 107 page dossier of 'evidence'.
Its immense strength comes through its stark logic. I kept thinking how it is a work that SHOWS rather than TELLS the details of the conspiracy. That is the mark of how powerful it is – a distillation down to bare, cold facts of decades of genocide. It is a ticking time-bomb. A hand-grenade down the pants of each defendant.
Something about that prose style seems a bit familiar...
