Live Free or Die!

Post by **grixit** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:43 am

The supporters of Ed Brown keep referring to the strength of their support in New Hampshire. Have any of them tried to relate it to the size of the vote for Ron Paul?

Cobalt Shiva · Post by **Cobalt Shiva** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:56 am

They'll cheerfully tell you that Ron Paul really won 95% of the vote in New Hampshire, but that the Zionist-Masonic-Jesuit conspiracy stole their ballots with black helicopters and replaced them with ballots for McCain and Clinton.

Post by **webhick** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:08 pm

I imagine that they'll try to use the excuse that most of Ron Paul's supporters are against registering their fictional entity with the government in order to vote because it gives the government a free pass to turn them into slaves and that the government is really tracking who votes for who so they can make the people who vote for the winning candidate the "Uncle Tom"s of America and put the Ron Paul supporters in a concentration camp. And besides, they all know that voting doesn't actually determine who the winning candidate is - that's done by a mahjong game between the Queen of England and Jerry Seinfeld.

Okay, maybe the last part I made up, but the first and second parts are based on what I actually heard from a supporter. Albeit, a whackjob sovereign citizen supporter, but still a supporter.

My theory is that his 8% is what happens when you spend too much of your campaigning time catering to fringe elements that, for the most part, don't vote. Holy flaming swordfish, don't waste that valuable time!

BBFlatt · Post by **BBFlatt** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:28 pm

webhick wrote:My theory is that his 8% is what happens when you spend too much of your campaigning time catering to fringe elements that, for the most part, don't vote. Holy flaming swordfish, don't waste that valuable time!

What else is he going to do with his time? no one else will talk to him.

Scoop · Post by **Scoop** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 6:42 pm

Cobalt Shiva wrote:They'll cheerfully tell you that Ron Paul really won 95% of the vote in New Hampshire, but that the Zionist-Masonic-Jesuit conspiracy stole their ballots with black helicopters and replaced them with ballots for McCain and Clinton.

You mean you haven't heard the news?
http://www.wmur.com/politics/15021642/detail.html

ErsatzAnatchist · Post by **ErsatzAnatchist** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:29 pm

Scoop wrote:
Cobalt Shiva wrote:They'll cheerfully tell you that Ron Paul really won 95% of the vote in New Hampshire, but that the Zionist-Masonic-Jesuit conspiracy stole their ballots with black helicopters and replaced them with ballots for McCain and Clinton.
You mean you haven't heard the news?
http://www.wmur.com/politics/15021642/detail.html

I was wonder why the black helicopter was flying over Sutton.

There also were complaints from Sutton, where election officials made a mistake and didn't report 31 votes for Republican Ron Paul. The secretary of state's office said the town clerk corrected the vote count when they learned of the error.

Post by **Demosthenes** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:34 pm

ErsatzAnatchist wrote:I was wonder why the black helicopter was flying over Sutton.

I'd tell Webhick to knock it off but then she'll start deleting random posts and making me feel bad again.

Dezcad · Post by **Dezcad** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:37 pm

Scoop wrote:
Cobalt Shiva wrote:They'll cheerfully tell you that Ron Paul really won 95% of the vote in New Hampshire, but that the Zionist-Masonic-Jesuit conspiracy stole their ballots with black helicopters and replaced them with ballots for McCain and Clinton.
You mean you haven't heard the news?
http://www.wmur.com/politics/15021642/detail.html

On a side note - Scoop, have you seen the Preliminary Witness List filed by the "Dogwalker" for his upcoming trial?