Demosthenes wrote:Nothing so deep. When weird things start happening all at once (Famspear, LPC, and I all sharing a senior moment), it just must be Webhick misusing her Illuminati skills for mischief. No other explanation is rational.
So, 'webhick' had a guilty conscience?
She obviously thought she was being chastised and deleted her bit of humor before it attracted any further attention? Hmm. I haven't figured out what a 'mock release' is.
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Certiorari
for Landmark Right to Petition Case
Constitutional Crisis Escalating
Coming: Appropriate Next Steps
Please consider a donation to help finance the work
of the WTP Foundation.
TRANSLATION:
We are almost out of options. However, we want as much money from you suckers as possible, because we would rather waste the time of the judicial system rather than actually working for a living.
Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak.
How can you have a landmark case when it has lost at every turn, and no one notices or cares?
Constitutional crisis? Where?? How???
I guess I missed this part in civics, what other steps after the Supreme Court said buzz off??
The horse is not only dead, the bones have fallen apart and crumbled to dust.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Certiorari
for Landmark Right to Petition Case
Constitutional Crisis Escalating
The following bluster comes at the end of the WTF [sic] web page:
Our Constitution is, indeed, hanging by a thread. We pray the Supreme Court will reconsider this grievous decision that denies to the People a declaration of the full contours of the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment.
During the coming days, this Foundation will announce what it believes are the appropriate next steps for the People to restore Constitutional Order and secure Freedom for ourselves, and our posterity.
Acta Non Verba
I would like to suggest that Schulz's sanity might be hanging by a thread.
And "Acta Non Verba" ("acts not words," of course) is the motto of the United States Merchant Marines, so Schulz has consented to admiralty jurisdiction.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Acts not words, huh? For some reason I just can't see Bob holed up in a self-made fortress discussing ideology with Randy Weaver. What acts could he possibly be planning to announce?
LPC wrote:And "Acta Non Verba" ("acts not words," of course) is the motto of the United States Merchant Marines, so Schulz has consented to admiralty jurisdiction.
Isn't admiralty jurisdiction a good thing? After all, isn't a libel of review (along perhaps with a refusal for cause) Van Pelt's favorite all-purpose remedy?
Ah, so many wackos, so little time.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
He could always subcontract with Gene to do it for him.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
After the petition for cert was denied by the SCOTUS, Bob filed an "Emergency Motion for Certificate of Agreement" (although in the body of the brief it is referred to as an application and not a motion) asking for a "Certificate" from the 2d Circuit Court of Appeals that it agrees that the SCOTUS should grant cert in their Petition case.
This is the 2d CA docket:
1/16/08 Order FILED DENYING motion for Certificate
of Agreement by Appellant Robert Schulz,
endorsed on motion dated 1/11/2008 [Entry
date Jan 22 2008 ] [CA]
