Edward William Ellis, Common Law QC

[AnOwlCalledSage]

It looks like his latest dupe is up for a hearing related to a mental fitness complaint made to the General Osteopathic Council. She's still registered.

EWE: "Hold my dialysis bag..."

Too sane to be an osteopath or too insane and needs to climb the pseudo-scientific quackery ladder to chiropractor en route to homeopath?

Admittedly I've only done cursory research, but it looks like she has been a properly qualified osteopath for over 20 years (and like pharmacists you have to keep you credentials current). However, it does seem that she has branched out into the whole "wellness" woo as a sideline. Perhaps there has been a complaint.

[longdog]

Properly qualified osteopath? Like being a properly qualified "light worker" or "crystal therapist"

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Properly qualified osteopath? Like being a properly qualified "light worker" or "crystal therapist"

They're basically a regulated massage parlour... for actual massage, not the other kind. I can see how some people would benefit from it. It's chiropractors that are the out and out quacks.

However, where osteopathy does venture into quack land is things like craniosacral therapy. Guess what Michelle Davies now specialises in!

[grixit]

You would have thought that a lawyer as distinguished as EWE would have his own chambers. Apparently not.

The Equity Lawyer will give Case Management Advice to Citizen Osteopath Ms Davies. He is dependent on the City Library for Internet Access and his Session Period is not long enough to give it now.

It looks like his latest dupe is up for a hearing related to a mental fitness complaint made to the General Osteopathic Council. She's still registered.

Don't you mean a mental fitness complaint fraud?

[longdog]

It's chiropractors that are the out and out quacks.

I had a GP who could "chiropract" bad backs and apart from the brief flash of agony it's a truly wonderful thing. He used the term "cracking" to avoid any association with quackery of course.

He got struck off when his desk was found to be full of child pornography by a locum which was disappointing but I suppose the GMC have higher aims than the care of my crappy spine.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

For those new this this one, it's a standard family property case where, egged on by drivel produced by EWE, the idiot assaulted a police officer assured of the righteousness of his case.

NOT BEFORE 11:40 am
For Mention (Defendant to Attend)
T20210297 NKRUMAH Akwasi 42MR1372521 NEHFM Crown Prosecution Service
MENTION REGARDING CASE PAPERS. DEFENDANT TO ATTEND COURT, PROSECUTION VIA CVP. DEFENDANT SELF REP

Now this could be interesting. For mention is normally just a procedural matter. However, the defendant has been asked to attend. Even then, I'd expect it to be a case withdrawn mention... but this one is unusually explicit that it involves the case papers.

Regular readers will be aware that EWE was physically removed from the last hearing and has been bombarding the Crown Court with his Royal Commission trash. Is Mr Nkrumah going to get the book thrown at him (and by that I mean a bound copy of the garbage EWE has been sending them)?

[longdog]

Could "mention regarding case papers" be a way of saying "This idiot has served the court with more EWE's bollocks as a defence and the court wants to be sure they are competent to conduct their own terrible and doomed defence"?

[AnOwlCalledSage]

I've snipped most of this email to EWE, but he's made it public. I bet Julia will be tutting very loudly!

Julia Spivack <constantia@uwclub.net> Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 12:34 PM
To: Michelle Davies <Michelle@worcester-osteopath.co.uk>
Cc: Equity Lawyer Edward Ellis <edward.w.ellis@gmail.com>

Michelle,

<snip>

This latest Royal Commission email should give you reassurance and confidence that Edward knows what he is doing and isn’t going to throw you under a bus. As per his paragraph above he will give you an explanation. I am in possession of all the raw evidence and original documents (e.g. copies of desperate letters from qualified osteopaths denied registration, the report by the Chief Medical Officer sweeping it all under the carpet) pertaining to the Corruption Debate in Parliament I inherited from Osteopath Dr Anthony Matthews who got the Corruption Debate together with his then MP Roger Gale (now Sir Roger Gale) – please don’t broadcast I have the documents – I don’t want another kerosene leak in my house !!

<snip>

Julia

(My highlighting)

Who's Julia Spivak? A quack convicted of passing herself of as a registered osteopath in 2012.

She calls herself Dr Julia Spivak, but I've seen no relevant qualification. However, she claims:

I have conducted the first and only comprehensive academic study of corruption in statutory healthcare regulation.

I wonder what drew herself and EWE together?

Maybe it was a mental health fraud?

I, Julia Spivack, was deemed by the GOsC to be suffering from a "mental condition" or a "personality disorder" for trying to save the life of a member of the public. The GOsC forced me to undergo a psychiatric assessment by Professor Stephen Hirsch, Emeritus Professor of Psychiatry at Imperial College, London

[AnOwlCalledSage]

I've been trying to get to the bottom of the case involving Mr Nkrumah. It looks like he was involved with EWE on other family matters cases, then it all turned Pete Tong.

Mr Nkrumah attended a magistrates court case involving a Victor Momoh on the 12th May who was accused of driving whilst uninsured and of having unroadworthy tyres. All bread and butter stuff. However, there appears to have been an in court room incident where the defendant demanded identification of the magistrate which was refused. The defendant then appears to have gone all FotLer and the magistrate ordered the court cleared. During that clearance, it would appear that Mr Nkrumah, who was in the public gallery, allegedly assaulted a police officer.

Then on the 28th July at Mr Nkrumah's plea hearing for that alleged assault, EWE was refused permission to act as his defence and was physically removed from the court. It also appears that in EWE's absence, Mr Nkrumah refused to go into the dock.

There don't appear to be any local news reports on it. However, that's probably because with local newspapers cutting back on reporters, they only tend to run a court item once all proceedings have concluded.

Update: Case Closed, so I guess there will not be a public gallery eviction fraud trial.

[longdog]

There don't appear to be any local news reports on it. However, that's probably because with local newspapers cutting back on reporters, they only tend to run a court item once all proceedings have concluded been reported on Facebook

FTFY

YW.

[dannyno]

I've been trying to get to the bottom of the case involving Mr Nkrumah. It looks like he was involved with EWE on other family matters cases, then it all turned Pete Tong.

Mr Nkrumah attended a magistrates court case involving a Victor Momoh on the 12th May who was accused of driving whilst uninsured and of having unroadworthy tyres. All bread and butter stuff. However, there appears to have been an in court room incident where the defendant demanded identification of the magistrate which was refused. The defendant then appears to have gone all FotLer and the magistrate ordered the court cleared. During that clearance, it would appear that Mr Nkrumah, who was in the public gallery, allegedly assaulted a police officer.

Then on the 28th July at Mr Nkrumah's plea hearing for that alleged assault, EWE was refused permission to act as his defence and was physically removed from the court. It also appears that in EWE's absence, Mr Nkrumah refused to go into the dock.

There don't appear to be any local news reports on it. However, that's probably because with local newspapers cutting back on reporters, they only tend to run a court item once all proceedings have concluded.

Update: Case Closed, so I guess there will not be a public gallery eviction fraud trial.

Is this the same guy, do we think, or just a common name?

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/general-civ ... s-in-force

Nkrumah, Akwasi G - Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice

Date when order complete: 16 June 2022.

Dan

[aesmith]

Interfering directly with child protection matters now. Jesus.

15-Year-Old Citizen Master xxxxxx xxxxxx will please conduct the Mass Remedy Tests for Family Reunification:
1. Move belongings from the Foster Home to the Family Home at XXX XXXXX Road, Southgate
2. Enjoy doing it
3. Notify the Equity Lawyer of the Final Move so that he can send the Notice Email to the Child Care Authority and Metropolitan Police

Name and address removed here, but are printed in plain text on EWE's web site.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Is this the same guy, do we think, or just a common name?

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/general-civ ... s-in-force

Nkrumah, Akwasi G - Administrative Court, Royal Courts of Justice

Date when order complete: 16 June 2022.

Dan

Interesting. I'd say it was the same person. CROs last 2 years. What was he up to in June 2020 I wonder?

I'm wondering if he filed some of EWE's gibberish back then. Might be worth a dig.

I read the contempt hearing and it seems the loophole he's exploiting is that the Judge was reluctant to put meaning on "acting as a lawyer" other than active filings and actual representation. Drafting was deemed not against his order as long as he himself didn't file it. Foolish in my opinion, but that's why I'm not a judge.

May J did not find the other alleged breaches proved in particular because she was not satisfied that "drafting alone" constituted a breach of the March 2016 order.

However, there are a list of trigger phrases in his GCRO that might have brought it to RCJ admin's attention.

1. Reference to an ‘Equity Lawyer’ or similar
2. Reference to the Citizen /Applicant as ‘Citizen’
3. Use of the phrases ‘Corruption Claim’, ‘Prosecution Fraud’ or any similar combination of a noun and ‘Fraud’
4. Use of the phrase ‘Proof Sets’
5. Any other features that provide reasonable grounds for believing that the Claim Form or Application Notice has been prepared by or on behalf of Mr Ellis

He's always been kicked out of court when trying to actually appear for the client, so technically he hasn't represented anyone.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Maybe it's not all over?

Identity Obligation Denial + Voluntary Identification + Secret Case Reference Admission + Secret Hearing Admission + Secret Hearing Judges Identification Denial Fraud + Conflict Jurisdiction Denial + Contempt Remedy Jurisdiction Denial Fraud + Accountability Denial Fraud + Fraud Continuity Case Transfer Fraud from Hertfordshire to Essex by Judge Mr for the State against the Citizen

Maybe the For Mention was to transfer the case to an Essex court?

To be honest, unless it was heinous assault, I expected the CPS to drop it anyway.

[longdog]

Transfer to an Essex court fraud surely.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Take Notice that the Signal Interference from an Unidentified Source causes Unreliable Television and Unreliable WIFI for the Equity Lawyer.

I'd like to thank Fred and Bert from the GCHQ signals department for their sterling work in preventing EWE from watching Homes Under The Hammer, as most of the properties he has tried to save have ended up under the hammer which is not good for his mental health.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Oh dear. Poor Ms Davies may soon regret engaging the services of our learned friend.

It seems she applied for an interim application against the General Osteopathic Council at the High Court and was told that the filing fee would be £10,000. That's what you get when EWE has resorted to producing draft documents to get around his restraining order (as previously mentioned, the Judge wouldn't rule that drafting applications was against his order). He may qualify for the fee to be waived on the basis of his income, but his marks don't.

EWE has posted Hearing Notice for 12 noon on 24th September 2021 at the Royal Court 37 at the Royal Courts of Justice so I don't know if she's coughed up or if the date is wishful thinking. Unfortunately interim applications don't get listed in the daily cause list.

[Hercule Parrot]

she applied for an interim application against the General Osteopathic Council at the High Court and was told that the filing fee would be £10,000.

Regardless of the merits of her particular grievance, that's disgraceful. It places the High Court beyond reach for the great majority of citizens, because now only the destitute and wealthy can afford to buy access to justice.

[longdog]

I'm calling bullshit on the £10,000 fees.

My entirely half arsed Google-Fu suggests that's the fee for a monetary claim of £200,000+ and a basic filing fee is around £500 + 5% of amount claimed.

My guess would be that EWE has advised his "client" to put in a claim for umptysquiliion pounds plus interest because reasons and it has attracted the maximum fee. Arguably that's exactly what the fees should do... Discourage totally meritless claims for insane amounts.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

I'm calling bullshit on the £10,000 fees.

My entirely half arsed Google-Fu suggests that's the fee for a monetary claim of £200,000+ and a basic filing fee is around £500 + 5% of amount claimed.

My guess would be that EWE has advised his "client" to put in a claim for umptysquiliion pounds plus interest because reasons and it has attracted the maximum fee. Arguably that's exactly what the fees should do... Discourage totally meritless claims for insane amounts.

That was my thought. I too looked up the fees and thought EWE did say that she was told via phone that it would be £100 and on the face of it, it seemed to be an injunction against the General Osteopathic Council, rather than a monetary claim.

However, he has hinted that some of the case involves the GOsC's indemnity insurance scheme, so it's not implausible that he's gone full Neelu in the claim amount and when she actually tried to file it the clerk took one look at it and revised the fee costs.