UK - Neelu Berry opens my eyes

[Larry Spoons]

Neelu is busily posting about a visit to Romford County Court last week and has helpfully reproduced the court list which includes:

BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC T/A HALIFAX -v- THE ESTATE OF THE LATE SADHARA DOLLY CHAUDHARI, POSSESSION/CLAIMANT'S APPLICATION - 30 MINUTES - ATTENDED HEARING 12:00 PM

Looks like we may be in for more videos of police and baillifs being harangued by her and being left slightly bemused by Edward Ellis

Amongst some very florid complaints about the hearing is a claim that her supporters were denied access to the court. That was a bit naughty if it happened without cause.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

That was a bit naughty if it happened without cause.

I'd agree 100% with that.

However, she and her supporters have been ejected from a court before for disrupting a hearing. Without her spilling the beans or EWE publishing another "Anonymous Adjudicator Fraud" in relation to this case (as he did when he and Mr Nkrumah were kicked out of St. Albans by security) we'll probably never know.

[Larry Spoons]

There's a video on her site in which it is suggested that her followers were not even allowed to enter the building. If that's the case (and I appreciate that the source isn't really reliable) it shouldn't have happened unless they were behaving in a disruptive manner. The Lord Chief Justice issued a note to judges a couple of weeks ago to remind them of the requirement for open justice.

As ever, we probably aren't told the whole story and it's a difficult one. The courts will be well aware of what is likely to happen, but can't act until it does.

Neelu has complained to HMCTS. I suspect that complaint will be upheld which will then be held out by her as evidence that she has brought down the whole corporate structure and that every court decision ever made against her or her friends and family is null and void

Her followers at the Bromley hearing included a gent calling himself 'London George' who appears intent upon getting himself locked up by failing to recognise the criminal courts in respect of charges relating to his alleged conduct towards a neighbour He is a disciple of 'fake courts' Badaloo. Another follower is Margaret Bass, a woman whose house was repossessed. She explains that she went to Nigeria to visit family and her house was gone when she returned. Unsurprisingly, we are not told how long her visit to Nigeria was and what steps she took to pay her mortgage in her absence.

Bass had a second house repossessed in September and is being 'helped' by Neelu and Devine. That help seems to consist of telling her not to engage with the mortgage company who even at this late stage are offering to discuss payment options to allow her back into possession.

[exiledscouser]

Interesting developments. I suspect that people were not denied entry purely because they were concerned and thoughtful supporters of No. 1 whistle blower and Swizzindo champ Princess Nelly.

Rather, the approach of a noisy and intimidating crew intent on reducing proceedings to a circus seems to me to be a more realistic interpretation and given court staff every reason to deny this mob access.

Of course, the powerful Masonic satanic (usual list ending in “ic”) cabal running everything may have pulled the strings.

[longdog]

There's a new video today and The Princess is of course making 'formal complaints'. As far as I can work out they are...

1) Something to do with being denied access.

2) The duty solicitor wasn't a solicitor (I think he was a some sort of housing advisor) and refused to take instruction. Quite how he should take instruction as a lawyer when he isn't one I have no idea.

3) The bank's lawyer is an imposter because of course he is.

4) Somebody, possibly everybody, told her to piss off as it was none of her business... I think... You know what she's like.

For those interested...



Only the first seven minutes is about the case and the last seven seem to be just old video she has cut in about her long deceased niece and SwissIndo bollocks.

[exiledscouser]

Does anyone know anything about the 'MatrixFreedom' get all your mortgage payments back scheme that Neelu now seems to have seized upon?

A bit more then on this. It looks increasingly like a Common Law Ponzi scheme. They are advertising for “agents” to refer “prospects” to them. The reward is a “Passive Income”, whatever that might look like.

So, what’s in it for the punter? The usual something for nothing mirage. Write off your mortgage promises the website, recover all mortgage payments (sounds like the usual dodgy DD reclaim malarkey), using your Birth Certificate, “set off” credit card debt, all loans, taxes both personal and business and recover all payments made from your bank account, irrespective of purpose.

Some thought has gone into the website but it’s really just another hollow Peter of England fantasy scheme. What’s worrying is that the usual vulnerable “prospects” or otherwise gullible will fall for this, part with what little money they have, go all Sovrn, burn their bridges with financial institutions and will be quickly dropped by those behind this scam when it inevitably fails. “You were not doing it right” they’ll be told as they are left well and truly in the shit.

Action Fraud aware.

[longdog]

It looks to me like the 'product' is just the letters that they sell you to send to your creditors thus avoiding any risk of being done for giving financial advice without the appropriate permissions.

At the end of the email my imaginary friend who signed up received it says...

Our information platforms provide education and are not intended as legal tax or financial advice. We do not provide any regulated services as defined in FSMA 2000.

Personally speaking I'd rather take my chances with the FCA than getting done for the obvious fraud that this is but maybe that's just me.

I was also looking at their 'affiliate' contract which essentially says that all of their totally unoriginal bollocks is their intellectual property and you agree not to even talk about it for ten years. From my barrack-room lawyer point of view it's so ludicrous that there's not a court in the land that would enforce any of it.

[Larry Spoons]

Only the first seven minutes is about the case and the last seven seem to be just old video she has cut in about her long deceased niece and SwissIndo bollocks.

She seems to suffer from a form of mental diarrhea. She simply can't stay on topic and eventually the tragic death of her niece, whistleblowers and Swissindo comes splurging out in an incomprehensible mess.

[longdog]

In her hopelessly muddled brain it's all intertwined as part of the a Grand Unified Conspiracy Theory.

[aesmith]

There's a new video today and The Princess is of course making 'formal complaints'. As far as I can work out they are...

The case was between the bank and the "estate of" her late sister. I am not sure who would represent the estate, would that be the executor? I suspect the reason for the duty solicitor refusing to take her instruction was because she is not a party in the case.

[longdog]

I suspect the reason for the duty solicitor refusing to take her instruction was because she is not a party in the case.

According to her majesty he wasn't actually a solicitor but taking that with a pinch of salt I can see three possible scenarios.

1) She is right and he wasn't a solicitor. He was merely a housing advisor trying to take care of people who are facing imminent homelessness and explaining their options.

2) He was the duty solicitor but a part of the conspiracy.

3) What you said. He was a solicitor but he refused to act for somebody who had no standing in the case.

I'd put 1 and 3 as being equally likely.

Either way I would have paid a few Re / Kindness Kredits / pebbles to listen to the exchange. Odds on it was The Princess being her usual entitled self and demanding the (non?) solicitor fight the good fight according to her delusional idea of how the law works.

Isn't it 100% typical of her to complain about a free service not living up to her unreasonable expectations? I'm sure he'll be receiving a notice removing him from his 'office' for failing to uphold his imaginary oath to god to protect god's children. Or is she not doing that at the moment?

[AnOwlCalledSage]

The case was between the bank and the "estate of" her late sister. I am not sure who would represent the estate, would that be the executor? I suspect the reason for the duty solicitor refusing to take her instruction was because she is not a party in the case.

So the scam cooked up by her and her late sister to pass the house to Neelu free and clear of a mortgage by setting up a family trust appears to have been dashed in probate and it remained the property of her deceased sister's estate.

[aesmith]

She may be right that he's not a solicitor, the web page that she screenshots shows that he has been acting as a "duty adviser". Blanking out his name ...

XXXX has specialised in Housing and Social Welfare Law since joining the firm in 1998.

Over his career XXXX has acted as housing possession court duty adviser across five east London County Courts and is co-author of a forthcoming Legal Action Group book on duty desk advice and representation. He is also a contributing author of the Legal Aid Handbook and writes regularly for the Legal Action magazine.

XXXX won the Social Welfare Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year award in 2020 and is co-chair of the Housing Law Practitioners’ Association.

By the way she's published a second video where bizzarely she's put the same subtitles as the previous one. So the subtitles and text bear no resemblance to what she is actually saying ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEQbYmHrE3U

[Larry Spoons]

It would appear to be a duty adviser scheme as opposed to a duty solicitor scheme that is available for repossession hearings:

https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_ ... possession

I'm guessing that is a bit too subtle a distinction for Neelu.

I'm loving the way that she complains that the duty adviser wouldn't take (bonkers) instructions, but also told the court that she was an observer as opposed to a participant in the proceedings. A bit of a contradiction there.

[longdog]

Given her propensity for trying to insert herself into cases that have absolutely nothing to do with her it seems odd that she wouldn't at least try in a case that does have something to do with her. Even if she has no legal standing.

So the scam cooked up by her and her late sister to pass the house to Neelu free and clear of a mortgage by setting up a family trust appears to have been dashed in probate and it remained the property of her deceased sister's estate.

Obviously that's at least mostly true and I'm starting to wonder if she's actually done anything to settle the will or if she's just unilaterally declared the whole estate hers without messing about with probate, HMRC, the banks and so on. Ably assisted on the finer points of law by Equitylawyeredwardwilliamellis of course.

If we take her claim to have only been there as observer at face value it also raises the possibility that the executor of the will is a lawyer and not stupid enough to fight a battle he can't win and probably doesn't want to.

<wild but plausible speculation>

Lawyer: "Right Mrs Berry. Your sister has left you her entire estate including her interest in the property, which you can live in, but you *MUST* make arrangements regarding the outstanding mortgage or you are going to be out on your ear."

The Princess: "I don't have to pay the mortgage as the house was left to me and blah, blah, SwissIndo, blah, blah, Satanists, blah, blah, murdered niece, blah, blah, fraud...."

Lawyer: "Fuck this shit!"

</wild but plausible speculation>

I'm not exactly sure what the legal relationship is between a executor lawyer and the beneficiaries of a will. I'm inclined to think the answer is "none" beyond a duty to act reasonably and not to their detriment.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

Obviously that's at least mostly true and I'm starting to wonder if she's actually done anything to settle the will or if she's just unilaterally declared the whole estate hers without messing about with probate, HMRC, the banks and so on. Ably assisted on the finer points of law by Equitylawyeredwardwilliamellis of course.

I refer my learned Gentleman back to the 22nd June.

The *** New North Road IG6 3EB Mortgage Case Instructions Notice dated 15th June 2021 from Walker Morris PLC for Bank of Scotland is addressed to The Occupier instead of Executor + Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis and Beneficiary + Citizen Ms Berry

Disclosure Request what happened to the communications from the Will Executor and Family Members to Halifax that are on the Case File for the Stated Reason that:

No Communications got an Acknowledgement or Response


<snip reason=irrelevant gibberish removed>

Sadhana Chaudhari was a Corruption Victim. She made Will Gifts on Corruption Remedy Conditions in the Will and Repeat Will to service Corruption Investigations. They got Fraud Conspiracy Proof during her lifetime and after her death.

<snip reason=irrelevant gibberish removed>

Corrupt Officers demanded Protection Frauds. They were given Contempt Claim Frauds 2019 004208 and 2020 000286 respectively against Citizen Ms Berry, who is the Sole Qualifying Beneficiary, and Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis, who is the Sole Executor.

The Defence Case Management got Fraud Proof that included use of General Civil Restraint Frauds as Probate Estate Management Sabotage Frauds for the Protection Fraud Network against the Sadhana Chaudhari Will Trust. Also, they got the completion of the Audio Record Proof Set.

On 16th April 2021, Claim Fraud 2020 000286 got the last of it. Other Cases got Similar Fact Proof. It included the Trust Claim Fraud B01B0837 + Mortgage F01PP7696 Repayment Refusal Notice Fraud dated 16th December 2020 from Walker Morris using reference CGD CLP HCC 00018.731 for Bank of Scotland. All of it completed the Fraud Proof Sets needed for Unfitness Cases against Top Judges in Parliament.

My reading of this is that her sister attempted to use a family trust to transfer the property into Neelu's name. Unfortunately, this would not have extinguished the outstanding mortgage and so her dead sister's estate had to be settled first. Now normally, Neelu could have inherited the property, pursuant to the trust allocation in the will, but my understanding is that an existing mortgage "dies" with the mortgager and Neelu would have to take out a new one. Now what mortgage company in its right mind would ever give Neelu a mortgage!?! Hence to settle the estate, the property needs to be sold.

At least she's had free accommodation for a while.

Of course, some of our active and not so active mortgage/legal contributors may have a more accurate reading of the runes for us!

[longdog]

Your attempt to parse that drivel into English does you credit but this bit still makes me wonder if ex-parrot-sister named a real, qualified and not struck off lawyer as executor and he's having none of it.

Disclosure Request what happened to the communications from the Will Executor and Family Members

I know you should be wary of applying logic when it involves Nutbag and Eddie but to my mind the fact it says "Will Executor and Family Members" can be read two ways. Either they are the same person(s) or they are different people and the princess is NOT an executor. I'd lean towards the latter.

Oh well... I suppose we will find out eventually. Equitylawyeredwardwilliamellis is inevitably going to let the cat out of the bag as he has precisely no grasp of the concept of confidentiality.

As far as I know you are right about the mortgage dying with the borrower, or the loan agreement at least. I have no experience of it but I assume that the lender gives people a reasonable amount of leeway to get the house on the market but of course that doesn't apply here as there's a parasite in residence.

[AnOwlCalledSage]

I have no experience of it but I assume that the lender gives people a reasonable amount of leeway to get the house on the market but of course that doesn't apply here as there's a parasite in residence.

Not just that, but I think all major lenders have protocols in place for the death of a borrower, and won't be banging on the door the next day rubbing their hands together with glee.

I suspect that the collusion between Neelu and her sister (and let's face it, her sister knew she had cancer quite some time ago and was a conspiracy nut as well) was not sufficient to expunge the debt of her estate so, regardless of the family trust arrangement, any legitimate executor could not just simple ignore it.

If Neelu had been in a position to get a mortgage for any outstanding amount, I suspect she'd have been able to take over the property. But we all know why she'll never ever get another mortgage.

[longdog]

But we all know why she'll never ever get another mortgage.

Because the Satanic powers that be need to silence a whistle-blower?

[HardyW]

Disclosure Request what happened to the communications from the Will Executor and Family Members

I know you should be wary of applying logic when it involves Nutbag and Eddie but to my mind the fact it says "Will Executor and Family Members" can be read two ways. Either they are the same person(s) or they are different people and the princess is NOT an executor. I'd lean towards the latter.

To my reading it's fairly clear that the Ellis character regards himself as Executor. Who made that appointment we can only guess.

I refer my learned Gentleman back to the 22nd June.

The *** New North Road IG6 3EB Mortgage Case Instructions Notice dated 15th June 2021 from Walker Morris PLC for Bank of Scotland is addressed to The Occupier instead of Executor + Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis and Beneficiary + Citizen Ms Berry

<snip>

Corrupt Officers demanded Protection Frauds. They were given Contempt Claim Frauds 2019 004208 and 2020 000286 respectively against Citizen Ms Berry, who is the Sole Qualifying Beneficiary, and Equity Lawyer Mr Ellis, who is the Sole Executor.