eric wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2023 7:20 pm
The Remedy" seems to be nothing more than a word for word copy of Scooter's "Notice of Mistake".
No surprises there. The sovcit/freeman scammers love stealing from each other and selling the idea to their own marks.
Also interesting was Scooter's claim that the Tender for Law had nothing to do with freemanism, the same as Wells is claiming.
And nothing to write home about, either. These con artists love repackaging the tripe as something new, or the "correct" method (thereby impugning the supposed reputation of the scammer they stole it from).
eric wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2023 7:20 pm
Perhaps a better idea would be to find an instance where Scott Duncan's methods have ever worked in court.
While that is probably a time saver, in Well's mind he hasn't gotten hold of Duncan's system. He will just say that it has nothing whatsoever to do with Duncan's methods, that Duncan lifted his method from Wells and got it all wrong, blah blah blah. So I think it is far better to require Wells to come up with proof for "his" method and if he can't do it, then we can just write him off and demonstrate what a loser *he* is.