Gardina v. Board of Registrars

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean

Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1755
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
Location: Brea, CA

Gardina v. Board of Registrars

Post by Arthur Rubin »

Can someone Shepardize the "two classes if citizenship" from Gardina v. Board of Registrars.

I can't argue against it on Facebook if I can't find a clean copy.
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
jcolvin2
Grand Master Consul of Quatloosia
Posts: 827
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 3:19 am
Location: Seattle

Re: Gardina v. Board of Registrars

Post by jcolvin2 »

The "two classes of citizenship" refers to being a citizen of the US (determined under national level immigration laws) and being a citizen of a state for voting purposes. The case involved whether a foreigner who announced his intention to be an Alabama citizen was entitled to vote.
The case distinguishes between foreigners who were midstream in the naturalization process, and citizens of other states who were becoming citizens of Alabama. The former were required to perfect their US citizenship before they could vote; the latter were just required to announce the intention to become citizens of Alabama in order to register to vote. The case appears to have been cited only 4 times.
Gardina v. Board of Registrars
Supreme Court of Alabama

February 2, 1909, Decided

No Number in Original
Reporter
160 Ala. 155 * | 48 So. 788 ** | 1909 Ala. LEXIS 4 ***

Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County.

Prior History: [***1] APPEAL from Birmingham City Court.
Heard before Hon. H. A. SHARPE.

Proceedings by Frank Gardina by mandamus to compel the board of registrars of Jefferson county to register him so as to be qualified to vote, upon his filing a declaration of his intention to become a citizen. From a judgment denying the writ, petitioner appeals. Affirmed.

Disposition: Affirmed.

Core Terms

election, naturalization, register, us citizen, right to vote, qualifications, prescribe, resident, foreigners, birth

Case Summary

Procedural Posture
Appellant petitioner sought review of a judgment of the Birmingham City Court (Alabama) denying his petition, by mandamus, to compel appellee, a county board of registrars, to register him so as to be qualified to vote upon his filing a declaration of his intention to become a citizen.

Overview
Petitioner was a man of foreign birth who had declared his intention to become a citizen of the State and the United States. Because he failed to perfect his naturalization, the board of registrars determined that petitioner was not entitled to vote. Petitioner filed a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the board to register him. The writ was denied. The court affirmed, holding that Ala. Code §§ 290, 291, and 312 (1907), did not authorize foreigners, who had merely declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, but who had not perfected their naturalization, to register or vote in the State. Because petitioner had not perfected his naturalization and was not a citizen at the time he applied for registration, he could not register to vote. There was no authority requiring the registration of petitioner as an elector of the state.

Outcome
The court affirmed the judgment of the trial court.


Hide sectionLexisNexis® Headnotes


Governments > State & Territorial Governments > Elections
Immigration Law > Duties & Rights of Noncitizens > Political Rights
HN1 State & Territorial Governments, Elections
See Ala. Const. of 1901, § 177. More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Governments > State & Territorial Governments > Elections
Immigration Law > Duties & Rights of Noncitizens > Political Rights
HN2 State & Territorial Governments, Elections
See Ala. Const. art. I, § 2 (1875). More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Civil Rights Law > Protection of Rights > Voting Rights > Gender & Sex Discrimination
Governments > State & Territorial Governments > Elections
Immigration Law > Duties & Rights of Noncitizens > Political Rights
HN3 Voting Rights, Gender & Sex Discrimination
See Ala. Code § 290 (1907). More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Governments > State & Territorial Governments > Elections
Immigration Law > Duties & Rights of Noncitizens > Political Rights
HN4 State & Territorial Governments, Elections
See Ala. Code § 291 (1907). More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Governments > State & Territorial Governments > Elections
Immigration Law > Duties & Rights of Noncitizens > Political Rights
HN5 State & Territorial Governments, Elections
See Ala. Code § 312 (1907). More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Constitutional Law > Elections, Terms & Voting > Race-Based Voting Restrictions
Governments > State & Territorial Governments > Elections
View more legal topics
HN6 Elections, Terms & Voting, Race-Based Voting Restrictions
The power to determine who are qualified electors and who are entitled to exercise the elective franchise is left to the several states. The federal constitution does not prescribe the regulations as to this matter, except that the electors for representatives in the United States Congress shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature, and also the Fifteenth Amendment, which forbids the state from denying any citizen the right to vote on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Civil Rights Law > Protection of Rights > Voting Rights > Gender & Sex Discrimination
Constitutional Law > Elections, Terms & Voting > Gender & Sex Voting Restrictions
View more legal topics
HN7 Voting Rights, Gender & Sex Discrimination
The exercise of elective franchise is a privilege, and not a right. The state may grant or deny the right. Aliens are denied the right. The Fifteenth Amendment does not deny the state the right to forbid any person from voting, but only provides that he shall not be excluded on account of his race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Minors and women may be and are usually excluded from the right to vote, and also those who have been convicted of infamous crimes, also idiots and lunatics, also non-residents of the state, county or municipality, etc., in which the election is to be held; but these are not the only qualifications that the states may require. They may require any qualifications, or exclude any person or class of persons, unless the federal constitution or the state constitution forbids it. More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(1)

Constitutional Law > Congressional Duties & Powers > Elections > Time, Place & Manner Restrictions
Governments > State & Territorial Governments > Elections
HN8 Elections, Time, Place & Manner Restrictions
A state may provide registration laws, and require that citizens conform thereto before they are entitled to vote. It is no excuse to the validity of such law that the registering officer may neglect to perform every duty and thereby disfranchise the electors. The remedy would be for the elector to compel the performance of the duty. But regulations as to the elective franchise must be reasonable and uniform and impartial, and they should not deny or abridge the constitutional right of the citizen, nor unnecessarily impede its exercise. Statutes may prescribe the time and place of elections, and they may also prescribe the notice to be given of the election. More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Constitutional Law > Topic Summary ReportSubstantive Due Process > Citizenship
Immigration Law > Naturalization > General Overview
View more legal topics
HN9 Substantive Due Process, Citizenship
The Constitution of the United States provides that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. U.S. Const. amend. XIV. More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)

Constitutional Law > Congressional Duties & Powers > Naturalization
HN10 Congressional Duties & Powers, Naturalization
The Congress of the United States has exclusive power to provide for naturalization, and is required to establish a uniform rule for all states, though it may provide for naturalization to be acquired by and through state courts. U.S. Const. art. 1, § 8, subd. 4. Naturalization is therefore a national right and privilege, rather than a matter of state concern. More like this Headnote

Recommended Source:
Shepardize® - Narrow by this Headnote(0)


Hide sectionHeadnotes/Summary


Headnotes
Mandamus.

1. Elections; Suffrage; Nature of Right.--Sovereignty practically resides only in those who exercise the right of suffrage, although theoretically it resides in all people.

2. Elections; Right of Suffrage; Power to Regulate.--Except as restricted by the fifteenth amendment of the Federal Constitution, and the provisions as to Congressional Electors, the power to determine who are entitled to exercise the right of suffrage is in the several states.

3. Elections; Validity of Regulation.--Regulations of the right of suffrage must be reasonable, uniform and impartial, and should not abridge the constitutional right of the citizen or unnecessarily prevent its exercise.

4. Elections; Franchise; Nature of Right.--The exercise of the right of elective franchise is a privilege rather than a right.

5. Elections; Registration; Validity.--Since an elector has a remedy to compel performance of the duty of registering by the proper officer the fact that the registering officer may by failure to perform his duty, disfranchise electors does not affect the validity of the state laws requiring citizens to conform to registration laws in order to vote.

6. Elections; Regulation; Manner of Holding.--It is within the power of the legislature to prescribe the time and place for holding an election, and require notice thereof.

7. Elections; Qualifications of Voters; Citizenship; Filing Declaration of Intention to Beocme.--Construing together section 2, Constitution 1875, and section 177, 290, 291 and 312 of Constitution 1901, it is held that foreigners who have merely filed a declaration of intention to become a citizen of the United States, have not, since the ratification of the Constitution of 1901, perfected their naturalization so as to be entitled to register and vote, nor are they citizens of this state within the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States, so as to entitled them to register and vote.

8. Aliens; Naturalization; Power.--Congress has the exclusive power to provide for naturalization, and it is, therefore, a national right and privilege rather than a state right and privilege.

9. Citizenship; Class.--There are two classes of citizenship under our form of government, citizens of the state and of the United States, and one may be a citizen of the latter and not be a citizen of the former.



Counsel: WILLIAM CONNIFF, for appellant.--There is but one question for decision, namely, has an alien, under the present Constitution, the right to registration on his declaration of intention to become a citizen of the state and the United States. To put it another way, did the Constitution of 1901 change the right he had previous to that time, or was it changed by the Act of 1903. We insist that it was not--Sec. 291, Code 1907; Scott v. Strobach, 49 Ala. 477; People v. Scott, 56 Mich. 154; Abrigo v. The State, 15 S.W. 408; State v. Murray; 28 Wis. 96; State v. Trumpf, 5 N.W. 876.

ALEXANDER M. GARBER, Attorney General, and THOS. W. MARTIN, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. --The petitioner is not entitled to be registered as he was not a qualified voter.--General Election law, 1903; sec. 2165, Fed. Statutes, Const. [***2] 1901.

Judges: JAMES J. MAYFIELD, J. JOHN R. TYSON, C. J., R. T. SIMPSON and N. D. DENSON, JJ., concurred.

Opinion by: MAYFIELD

Opinion
[*156] [**789] MAYFIELD, J.--We agree with counsel for appellant that there is but one question to be decided on this appeal, namely, can a man of foreign birth be registered as an elector of this state, on his mere declaration of [*157] intention to become a citizen of the state and the United States? The law regulating this subject is as follows:

Const. Ala. 1901, § 177:

HN1 "Every male citizen of this state who is a citizen of the United States, and every male resident of foreign birth, who, before the ratification of this Constitution, shall have legally declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States, twenty-one years old or upwards, not laboring under any of the disabilities named in this article, and possessing the qualifications required by it, shall be an elector, and shall be entitled to vote at any election by the people: Provided, that all foreigners who have legally declared their intention to become citizens of the United States, shall, if they fail to become citizens thereof at the time they are entitled to become such, [***3] cease to have the right to vote until they become such citizens."

Const. Ala. 1875, § 2, art. 1:

"HN2 That all persons resident in this state, born in the United States, or naturalized, or who shall have legally declared their intention to become citizens of the state of Alabama, possessing equal civil and political rights."

Code Ala. 1907, §§ 290, 291:

HN3 "290. Qualification of Elector to Vote.--Every male citizen of this state who is a citizen of the United States, and every male resident of foreign birth, who, before the ratification of the present Constitution of the state, shall have legally declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States, twenty-one years old or upwards, not laboring under any of the disabilities named in section 293 (1557) of this Code, and who shall have resided in this state at least two years, in the county one year, and in the precinct or ward three months, immediately preceding the election at which he offers to vote, and who shall have been duly registered as an elector, and shall [*158] have paid, on or before the first day of February next preceding the date of the election at which he offers to vote, all poll taxes due from him for [***4] the year 1901, and for each subsequent year, shall be an elector, and shall be entitled to vote at any election by the people.

HN4 "291. Foreigners, Right to Vote.--All foreigners, who shall have legally declared their intention to become citizens of the United States shall, if they fail to become citizens thereof at the time they are entitled to become such, cease to have the right to vote until they become such citizens."

Code of Alabama, 1907, § 312:

HN5 "Persons Qualified to Register.--The following persons, and no others, who, if their place of residence shall remain unchanged, will have, at the date of the next general election the qualifications as to residence prescribed by section 290 (1556) of this Code, [**790] shall be qualified to register as electors, provided they shall not be disqualified under section 293 (1557) of this Code," etc.

Elections are the machines through which the voice of the people acting in their sovereign capacity is transferred into law. These elections must be exercised at the time, place, and in the manner prescribed by the Constitution and statutes which the people, through their agents, have constituted. By means of elections the people choose [***5] these officers, and choose those who shall exercise the legislative, executive, and judicial functions of the government. The Constitutions of the various states contains provisions that certain specific propositions, such as amendments of Constitutions, removal of county seats, election of officers, etc., shall be determined by the vote of the electors, either by a majority or sometimes by two-thirds majority of the electors. While the sovereignty is in the people, theoretically speaking, practically considered it resides in those [*159] persons only who are permitted to exercise the right of elective franchise. Cooley, Const. Lim. 752.

HN6 The power to determine who are qualified electors and who are entitled to exercise the elective franchise is left to the several states. The federal Constitution does not prescribe the regulations as to this matter, except that the electors for Representatives in Congress shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the state legislature, and also the fifteenth amendment, which forbids the state from denying any citizen the right to vote on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. HN7 The [***6] exercise of elective franchise is a privilege, and not a right. The state may grant or deny the right. Aliens are denied the right. The fifteenth amendment does not deny the state the right to forbid any person from voting, but only provides that he shall not be excluded on account of his race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Minors and women may be and are usually excluded from the right to vote, and also those who have been convicted of infamous crimes, also idiots and lunatics, also non-residents of the state, county or municipality, etc., in which the election is to be held; but these are not the only qualifications that the states may require. They may require any qualifications, or exclude any person or class of persons, unless the federal Constitution or the state Constitution forbids it. HN8 The state may provide registration laws, and require that citizens conform thereto before they are entitled to vote. It is no excuse to the validity of such law that the registering officer may neglect to perform every duty and thereby disfranchise the electors. The remedy would be for the elector to compel the performance of the duty. But regulations as to the elective franchise [***7] must be reasonable and uniform and impartial, and they should not deny or abridge the constitutional [*160] right of the citizen, nor unnecessarily impede its exercise. Statutes may prescribe the time and place of elections, and they may also prescribe the notice to be given of the election.--Cooley Const. Lim. 757, 758.

It will be observed that the Constitution of 1901, and the election laws thereafter, wrought a complete change in the qualifications of electors and mode of registration as prerequisites to vote. It is also clear that only those foreigners who had declared their intention before the adoption of the Constitution of 1901 could register or vote thereafter, and they must have become citizens at the time they were entitled to become such, else they lost their right to vote or register until they did become citizens. The Code provisions on this subject were evidently intended to make these constitutional provisions perpetual, so as to apply to future cases.

The election laws, statute or Code, do not authorize these foreigners who have merely declared their intention to become citizens of the United States since the Constitution of 1901 was ratified, but who have not [***8] perfected their naturalization as required, to register or vote in this state, and it is doubtful if the Legislature could so authorize. It appearing that the appellant in this case had declared his intention of becoming a citizen since the ratification of the Constitution, and that he had not perfected his naturalization and was not a citizen at the time he applied for registration it follows that he cannot register until he perfects his naturalization, unless he is a "citizen of this state" within the meaning of the election laws of this state.

It will be observed that section 2, art. 1, of the Constitution of 1875, defined or prescribed who were citizens of this state, and that appellant would be a citizen under that section; but it also appears that that section was not embraced in, or adopted as a part of, the Constitution [*161] of 1901, and there is no substitute for it in the new Constitution. We must, therefore, resort to other sources for a definition of "citizen of this state." The word "citizen" has come to us from the Roman law. In Roman law it designated a person who had the freedom of the city of Rome and could exercise the political and civil privileges of the [***9] Roman government.--2 Kent, Com. p. 76, note. It was both an honor and a sacred privilege to be a Roman citizen. Paul, the great Apostle of the Gentiles, claimed and asserted the right of a Roman citizen when apprehended in Jerusalem. The chief captain answered him: "With a great sum obtained I this freedom, but Paul said, 'I was free born.'" Again this great Apostle is heard to say: "I am a man which am a Jew, of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city." Citizenship [**791] has always been regarded as the most sacred right or privilege that the sovereign can confer. Mr. Webster defines "citizen" as "a person, native or naturalized, who has the privilege of voting for public officers and who is qualified to fill public offices in the gift of the people; also either native-born or naturalized persons who are entitled to full participation in the exercise and enjoyment of so-called private rights." Bouvier says a citizen, in American law, is one who, under the Constitution and law of the United States, has a right to vote for Representatives in Congress and other public officers and who is qualified to fill offices in the gift of the people; that all persons, born or [***10] naturalized, in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

The Supreme Court of Nebraska has held that "citizen," as used in that Constitution, relative to the right to hold office, means a person who is an American citizen by birth or a person of foreign birth who has been naturalized.-- [*162] State v. Boyd, 31 Neb. 682, 48 N.W. 739, 51 N.W. 602. HN9 The Constitution of the United States provides: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside." Const. Amend. 14. HN10 Congress of the United States has exclusive power to provide for naturalization, and is required to establish a uniform rule for all states, though it may provide for naturalization to be acquired by and through state courts.--Constitution U. S. art. 1, § 8, sub. 4. Naturalization is therefore a national right and privilege, rather than a matter of state concern.--Scott v. Strobach, 49 Ala. 477.

There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one [***11] of the United States and one of the state. One class of citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually exist in the same person. The federal Constitution, by this amendment, has undertaken to say who shall be citizens both of the states and United States. Prior to this amendment, the states could probably have determined, respectively, who were citizens of each, though naturalization has been exclusively a national subject, rather than a state, since the federal Constitution was first adopted. Consequently we find no authority, state or national, for registering appellant as an elector of this state.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6120
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: Gardina v. Board of Registrars

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

It is possible to be a "U.S. National" and not be a citizen; but that applies ONLY if you were born in American Samoa, Swains Island, or the "U.S. Minor Outlying Islands." Those are: Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Atoll, Palmyra Atoll, and Wake Island, all in the Pacific Ocean, and Navassa Island, in the Caribbean Sea. Otherwise, if you are born anywhere else under U.S. sovereignty, you are a U.S. citizen, and a citizen of the state where you reside, from birth; and while expatriation is possible, you cannot do so while you are physically present in the U.S. Most people who do that have become permanent residents or citizens of another country, with no intention of ever again becoming domiciled in the U.S.; and there are specific steps which must be taken to accomplish this. No Sovcit has ever done so.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7580
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: Gardina v. Board of Registrars

Post by wserra »

Pottapaug1938 wrote: Tue May 14, 2024 2:54 amNo Sovcit has ever done so.
One entry in a long, long list.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
Location: Wherever my truck goes.

Re: Gardina v. Board of Registrars

Post by JamesVincent »

Arthur Rubin wrote: Mon May 13, 2024 8:21 pm I can't argue against it on Facebook if I can't find a clean copy.
If your Facebook interactions are anything like mine there would be no point in interjecting fact, would just confuse them and make them angry.
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire

Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"