Elisabeth Nolson, Universal Community Trust, absolute madness

[AnOwlCalledSage]

So, even if, somehow, there were no legal requirement to repay my mortgage, credit card bill or auto loan (there is), it seems to me that there would be a moral obligation to do so.

Not just moral. Actual. Isn't this the O'Bonkers (Snr) case in a nutshell? Bank of Scotland Plc v Waugh & Ors [2014] EWHC 2117 (Ch)

Trusts, mortgages, signed but non-attested documents. The documents were not up to snuff but there had undeniably been a loan agreed to by all parties which had to be paid back.

that there is no realistically arguable defence to the claim for the sums due under the facility letter and the Bank is entitled to summary judgment in respect of the sums claimed.
...
the Legal Charge was, nonetheless, effective as an equitable charge

So even when the charge was "successfully" challenged, the property was still sold to satisfy the mortgage but O'Bonkers has been touting it as some great victory and proof of fraud rather than sloppy paperwork ever since in an effort to extract monies from the terminally stupid