http://www.losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=648I have come th [sic] the concultion [sic] that the only way the tax hoax is being proped [sic] up is by currupt [sic] judges and lawyers. It occures [sic] to me that if we really want to fix it then we need to start taking them out of the loop. I know that if a lawyer can be proven guilty of something then you need only alert the bar association. Dose [sic] anyone know what to do with judges.
If we can figure out whats [sic] needed, whats [sic] consider [sic] evidence then we can start dropping [sic] them,one at a time. We could(Theoretically)take back everything we lost a small peice [sic] at a time.
Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
From "douglas":
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Fourth Shogun of Quatloosia
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 3:04 pm
- Location: Here, I used to be there, but I moved.
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
Seems like Douglas needs to finish the third-grade before he can launch a plan to fix the judiciary.
Light travels faster than sound, which is why some people appear bright, until you hear them speak.
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
I guess it's theoretically possible that Douglas actually writes and spells as well as Hemingway did, but that Douglas is just drooling so badly that the dripping is causing him to have keyboard malfunctions.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Quatloosian Master of Deception
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: Sanhoudalistan
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
I think Douglas is just asking how judges can be reported for misconduct. His plan has one major flaw. Any complaints will be handled by judges who, according to Douglas, are corrupt.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
It also won't work because the vast majority of judges have not committed misconduct. He's going to have to really stretch on a lot of them:Quixote wrote:I think Douglas is just asking how judges can be reported for misconduct. His plan has one major flaw. Any complaints will be handled by judges who, according to Douglas, are corrupt.
"Your honor, you need to be fired for misconduct because in 1972 you lied to your five year old daughter when she wanted to know how babies are made."
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
BTW, what's it called when judge is removed? Are they de-benched?
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
Federal judges are impeached, and it has happened at least a few times in the last 10-15 years.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
Douglas dripped drool deep down the device disabling it? His disabled device definately denotes a distinct disadvantage dictated to Douglas during discussions and other dialogue. Douglas should diligently dry the device he disabled.Famspear wrote:I guess it's theoretically possible that Douglas actually writes and spells as well as Hemingway did, but that Douglas is just drooling so badly that the dripping is causing him to have keyboard malfunctions.
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
Oops. This is gettin' to be a chronic situation, here.RyanMcC wrote:Douglas dripped drool deep down the device disabling it? His disabled device definately denotes a distinct disadvantage dictated to Douglas during discussions and other dialogue. Douglas should diligently dry the device he disabled.Famspear wrote:I guess it's theoretically possible that Douglas actually writes and spells as well as Hemingway did, but that Douglas is just drooling so badly that the dripping is causing him to have keyboard malfunctions.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
Would you say that Douglas demonstrated delinquency in his due diligence during the dehydration of the disabled device?RyanMcC wrote:Douglas dripped drool deep down the device disabling it? His disabled device definately denotes a distinct disadvantage dictated to Douglas during discussions and other dialogue. Douglas should diligently dry the device he disabled.Famspear wrote:I guess it's theoretically possible that Douglas actually writes and spells as well as Hemingway did, but that Douglas is just drooling so badly that the dripping is causing him to have keyboard malfunctions.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
This is contagious. Maybe there's a pill we can all take, or something.webhick wrote:Would you say that Douglas demonstrated delinquency in his due diligence during the dehydration of the disabled device?RyanMcC wrote:Douglas dripped drool deep down the device disabling it? His disabled device definately denotes a distinct disadvantage dictated to Douglas during discussions and other dialogue. Douglas should diligently dry the device he disabled.Famspear wrote:I guess it's theoretically possible that Douglas actually writes and spells as well as Hemingway did, but that Douglas is just drooling so badly that the dripping is causing him to have keyboard malfunctions.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
I am (sic)'ened by that post.
How on earth did he get "theoretically" right?
Infinite number of monkeys indeed!
How on earth did he get "theoretically" right?
Infinite number of monkeys indeed!
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
Definitely.webhick wrote:Would you say that Douglas demonstrated delinquency in his due diligence during the dehydration of the disabled device?RyanMcC wrote: Douglas dripped drool deep down the device disabling it? His disabled device definately denotes a distinct disadvantage dictated to Douglas during discussions and other dialogue. Douglas should diligently dry the device he disabled.
Doubtful.Famspear wrote:This is contagious. Maybe there's a pill we can all take, or something.
-
- Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
- Posts: 3994
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
There is, but it gives your bladder Tourette's.Famspear wrote:This is contagious. Maybe there's a pill we can all take, or something.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
-
- Further Moderator
- Posts: 7559
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
- Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
The alliteration on this site, to quote Graham Chapman's prudish British general character, is getting "rather silly." Any additional attempts at alliteration are absolutely anticipating another action of admonishment and abuse .
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
-
- Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
- Location: Yuba City, CA
Re: Veiled threat? Or just an inarticulate loserhead?
Or maybe he's boozing it up like Hemmingway.Famspear wrote:I guess it's theoretically possible that Douglas actually writes and spells as well as Hemingway did, but that Douglas is just drooling so badly that the dripping is causing him to have keyboard malfunctions.
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros