I came across this and thought you would be interested.
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1176282246546
See?? It DOES happen.
-
- Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
- Posts: 5773
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
-
- Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
- Posts: 5773
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Yeah, I agree. This is rather egregious. Maybe they were just tired of fighting.Demosthenes wrote:The people involved in this case should have gotten a lot more money in their settlement IMHO.Imalawman wrote:You won't find anyone here that thinks the IRS is perfect. Sometimes they deserve to lose. Just not to wackos and their nonsense.
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
-
- Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
- Location: Earth
There was a Tax Court case earlier this week that I was thinking about citing because the Tax Court reversed the IRS on the result of a collection due process hearing, holding that it was an "abuse of discretion" for the IRS to deny innocent spouse relief.Imalawman wrote:You won't find anyone here that thinks the IRS is perfect. Sometimes they deserve to lose. Just not to wackos and their nonsense.
To me the case demonstrated two things:
1. CDP hearings really can serve the purpose for which they were intended (which was not to allow tax deniers another chance to vent); and
2. The IRS does make mistakes and when it does, the courts are willing and able to correct them.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
-
- J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Southern California
-
- Judge for the District of Quatloosia
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 6:04 pm
- Location: West of the Pecos
What is not realized are the situations where the person(s) being persecuted don't have the resources to mount a serious or determined defense and simply buckle.LPC wrote: There was a Tax Court case earlier this week that I was thinking about citing because the Tax Court reversed the IRS on the result of a collection due process hearing, holding that it was an "abuse of discretion" for the IRS to deny innocent spouse relief.
To me the case demonstrated two things:
1. CDP hearings really can serve the purpose for which they were intended (which was not to allow tax deniers another chance to vent); and
2. The IRS does make mistakes and when it does, the courts are willing and able to correct them.
I, and most here, probably know someone who will just about pay anything (assuming they have it) to avoid getting into a protracted fight in such matters. There is a general sense that like the list of "aggressive tax preparers," there are lists you don't want to be on.
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three