Pete's belief, which you are a victum of, is that section 3401(a) "wages" is limited to government employee's and the like "same class or kind" employee.
Unfortunately, this illogical belief is provably wrong by actually reading section 3401(a) completely and comprehensively.
Section 3401(a) itself contradicts Petes theory that 3401(a) is limited to like class or kind "government employee's".
What I mean is understand the construction of section 3401(a).
Section 3401(a) is written mainly to tell you what is not 3401(a) wages for the imposition of the income tax at section 1. Section 3401(a) goes into more detail about what is not 3401(a) "wages" than what is 3401(a) "wages".
Where Pete goes terribly wrong (I have strong reason to beleive its intentional because Pete knows what I'm about to tell you) is that Pete stopped at 3401(a) and doesnt continue to intergrate 3401(a)(1) through 3401(a)(22) into CtC's master plan theory that 3401(c) "employee" is limited to government like kind or class employee.
There are 22 exclusions in section 3401(a) explaining what is not subject to the section 1 income tax.
17 of these 22 exclusions deal with a combination of 3121(a) "wages" and 3121(b) "employment" for Social Security purposes.
1 exclusion has been repealed.
2 exclusions deal directly with government employee's. (wow! only 2 which doesnt give much creditability to Pete)
2 other exclusions deal with gross income from trust funds.
Pete's real 800 pound gorilla problem is to prove everyday common workers are not included as earning 3401(a) "wages" because section 3401(a) has 17 exclusions based on chapter 21 Social Security and 2 from trusts.
PETE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT HES TALKING ABOUT WHEN IT COMES TO "EMPLOYEE" WHICH OBVIOUSLY THE LAW PROVES AND THE COURTS AGREE!
Pete leads his readers to believe that 3401(a) is a seperate wage from 3121(a), so why are there 17 exclusions to 3401(a) "wages" based on chapter 21's "employment" and two exclusions based on trusts which have nothing to do with federal employee's.
So why is Pete telling you something totally opposite and untrue?
You CtCer's who are denying yourself the truth and the rule of law are included as a 3401(c) "employee" because the 3401(c) "employee" is based on what is or what is not 3401(a) "wages".
If you have a ssn you are involved in 3121(b) "employment" and make 3121(a) "wages" the only way you would not make 3401(a) "wages" would be to fall within the exclusions found between 3401(a)(1) through 3401(a)(22).
Well you can argue all you want with the definitions to chapter 21 to try and prove your point, but that will not work either because "American Employer" is any individual of the United States, including you!
Code: Select all
(h) American employer
For purposes of this chapter, the term “American employer” means an employer which is—
(1) the United States or any instrumentality thereof,
[u][b](2) an individual who is a resident of the United States, [/b][/u]
(3) a partnership, if two-thirds or more of the partners are residents of the United States,
(4) a trust, if all of the trustees are residents of the United States, or
(5) a corporation organized under the laws of the United States or of any State. Maybe you should try and confirm those civil law state code definitions before Pete gets you to beleive they do not apply to you.
Code: Select all
(e) State, United States, and citizen
For purposes of this chapter—
(1) State
The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa.
(2) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. I'll tell you now like I said a long time ago. Pete will be put in prison!
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!