Cost of CtC: $24.95Another Hendrickson follower has doubts
Frivolous filing penalties for using CtC: $30,000.00
Look on the face of an idiot who has finally figured out that he has been had: Priceless
Cost of CtC: $24.95Another Hendrickson follower has doubts
Many moons ago, a colleague of mine at Legal Aid (the NYC public defender office) kept a quite realistic plastic replica of a human skull on his desk. When asked what it was, he would answer that it was the last guy who wouldn't take the plea.RyanMcC wrote:Funny.. Evil.. But Funny.. It would suck to walk in for an audit and see that..Imalawman wrote:I had a guy that I worked with a lot in the IRS who kept a small bottle of red liquid on his desk. The label read, "turnip blood". It always made me chuckle.
That has been my contention about the TP movement for years, that the leaders, deep down, know that what they are preaching/selling to their followers isn't going to work like they say it will, that the real goal is to attract enough people to rebel and not pay taxes. The goal is to overwhelm the status quo with hordes of non-compliant TPs, the belief being that the system will not be able to stand up to it and will collapse. And in their viewpoint, if the system does not collapse many of the followers will be able to avoid arrest and prosecution based on the "herd" defense (only the "weaker" ones will get picked off and individuals within the herd will find safety in numbers).RyanMcC wrote:This is a notion that I see alot of tax protesters subscribe to. Thier belief is that if they can get enough people to stop paying taxes, the ones that still do will demand a different system and the IRS will collapse.
If a tax protester truely believes that, and believes the ends justify the means, it doesn't matter if the arguement they are making is valid, it only matters that someone will believe it and stop paying taxes. Sure it causes collateral damage, but you can't make an omelet without cracking a few eggs, and considering the well-being of others isn't something tax protesters are generally well-known for.
Naturally their logic is flawed on many levels (they can't get enough people to do it, the IRS wouldn't collapse even if they did), but they are largely oblivious to that. It's also a "saftey in numbers" issue. They probally believe that the more people the government has to deal with, the less likely it is they will get attention turned on them.
There's also that old saying "misery loves company". It's entirely possible that they just feel less stupid knowing they aren't the only ones getting in trouble with the government.
I'm certainly glad of it. I would shudder to think I could pick up a job being snarky toward tax protestors outside of Quatloos if they suddenly all wised up.. wrote:Self-delusion is inherently wonderful and satisfying.
CtC will be replaced by something else wonderfully satisfying and equally delusional.
This is the truly sad thing here. I have less of a problem with the wacky loner who believes he's fighting the good fight against the evil and oppressive State. The damage the loner does is limited to whatever his tax contribution would have been. What this guy has done, though, is unforgivable. His wife, who is unlikely to have ever done this without her husband's cajoling, may end up in jail because of the unbelievable selfishness of Artis.These are my wife's returns and she is really starting to panic. I have continually assured her that the law is clear, and is on our side, but thus far things have gotten much worse than before we started this process.
See also: Hovind, Jo.Lasagna wrote:What this guy has done, though, is unforgivable. His wife, who is unlikely to have ever done this without her husband's cajoling, may end up in jail because of the unbelievable selfishness of Artis.
I wonder if he also convinced her to file separately, so that he didn't have to sign the return.Lasagna wrote:Also, please note that Artis Register's post implies that his wife is the one earning money, and that he's unemployed. Nice job, Artis.
God, that would be low: "I am absolutely convinced that filing a tax return of zero is legal and proper, but on the off-chance that the IRS does make a stink about it, I'll use the wife as a mineshaft canary. If she survives, maybe I'll stick my neck out." I wonder if we can find out. Do we have any Quatloos agents on the LH boards that can surreptitiously ask him?LPC wrote:I wonder if he also convinced her to file separately, so that he didn't have to sign the return.Lasagna wrote:Also, please note that Artis Register's post implies that his wife is the one earning money, and that he's unemployed. Nice job, Artis.
Not any more. Sheesh. Where's your office - that midtown building with the big new sign, "Secret Headquarters of Polish Espionage"?Lasagna wrote:Do we have any Quatloos agents on the LH boards that can surreptitiously ask him?
Ha! That was awesome. I was going to try to come up with a witty reply, but that was way too funny to taint with a lame joke by me.wserra wrote:Not any more. Sheesh. Where's your office - that midtown building with the big new sign, "Secret Headquarters of Polish Espionage"?