Reno's daddy makes threats

[Demosthenes]

US Dist. Court; NH employees put on NOTICE; Mar 13, 09

Sent by certified mail, return receipt requested
7008 2810 0001 0429 6204
District of New Hampshire
53 Pleasant Street
Concord, New Hampshire 03301

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOTICE OF VIOLATION
. AND CRIMINAL INTENT
Vs.  FILE ON DEMAND 
CIRINO GONZALEZ POST ON BULLETIN
Cr. No. 07-189-01-GZS

NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND CRIMINAL INTENT

In as much as UNITED STATES officials are protected, by law, from personal
liability only within the performance of their OFFICIAL duties, The
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, and ALL of its
officers, employees, and agents IS/ARE Hereby NOTIFIED of their
violation of:

A. Article 1 section 8 clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution:
…to
exercise exclusive Legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by cession of
particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of
Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over
all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in
which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, magazines,
Arsenals, dock Yards, and other needful Buildings;…”

B. New Hampshire revised statutes and specifically RSA 123:1:
TITLE
IX ACQUISITION OF LANDS BY UNITED STATES; FEDERAL AID CHAPTER 123
JURISDICTION OVER LANDS ACQUIRED; TAX EXEMPTION Section 123:1, 123:1
Ceded to United States.
– Jurisdiction is ceded to the United States of America over all lands
within this state now or hereafter exclusively owned by the United
States, and used as sites for post offices, custom-houses, military air
bases, military installations or other public buildings: provided, that
an accurate description and plan of the lands so owned and occupied,
verified by the oath of some officer of the United States having
knowledge of the facts, shall be filed with the secretary of this
state; and, provided, further, that this cession is upon the express
condition that the state of New Hampshire shall retain concurrent
jurisdiction with the United States in and over all such lands, so far
that all civil and criminal process issuing under the authority of this
state may be executed on the said lands and in any building now or
hereafter erected thereon, in the same way and with the same effect as
if this statute had not been enacted; and that exclusive jurisdiction
shall revert to and revest in this state whenever the lands shall cease
to be the property of the United States

C. 40 U.S.C. § 255. This
statute requires the head or authorized officer of the agency acquiring
or holding property to file with the state a formal acceptance of such
"jurisdiction, exclusive or partial as he may deem desirable," and
further provides that in the absence of such filing "it shall be
conclusively presumed that no such jurisdiction has been acquired." See
Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (district court is without
jurisdiction to prosecute soldiers for rape committed on an army base
prior to filing of acceptance prescribed by statute). The requirement
of 40 U.S.C. § 255 can also be fulfilled by any filing satisfying state law…

Further
action on the part of officers, employees, and agents pertaining or
related to Cr. No. 07-189-01-GZS will be deemed as a WILLFUL AND
INTENTIAL VIOLATION on the part of ALL officers, employees, and agents
NOTIFIED herein; making any/ALL officers, employees, and agents
personally LIABLE and subject to civil/criminal litigation. Other
cases, previous, current, pending, or future, are also affected.

Denials,
by Officers of the Court, of MOTIONs questioning JURISDICTION and
refusal to demand, of the U.S Attorney, a demonstration/..REVELATION
OF JURISDICTION, regarding A, B, and C above, is deemed as
conspiratorial and a violation of OTHER acts, codes, rules, and
statutes to be considered upon further investigation by COMPLIANT
States authorities with proper jurisdiction.

Officials,
employees, and agents of/within the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, may also be in violation of other New
Hampshire and United States Statutes, Acts, Codes, and Rules requiring
the prevention of, and acting upon, criminal activity known to them and
may apply retroactive as per investigation.

As
a concerned third-party, this NOTICE is hereby served as a demand of
release of Cirino Gonzalez as the ONLY option available to the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE within its STATUS of
NONCOMPLIANCE of A, B, and C above.



_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..______________ _________
Jose M. Gonzalez Date

This document was acknowledged before me on _____________ (date)

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(signature of notarial officer) Seal/Stamp:

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(print name notarial officer) My commission expires:.._.._______________


ALL Employees, Associates, Contractors, Management within
FCI EL RENO
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
P.O. BOX 1000
EL RENO, OK 73036

NOTICE of CRIMINAL/CIVIL LIABILITY
To be POSTED on facility BULLETIN BOARDS, copied/..forwarded to all Employees, Associates, Contractors, and Management by Management/..Director.

You
are hereby informed that The United States District Court, District of
New Hampshire has been/is in violation, and refuses to comply with the
conditions of:
A. Article 1 section 8 clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution:
…to
exercise exclusive Legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by cession of
particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of
Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over
all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in
which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, magazines,
Arsenals, dock Yards, and other needful Buildings;…”

B. New Hampshire revised statutes and specifically RSA 123:1:
TITLE
IX ACQUISITION OF LANDS BY UNITED STATES; FEDERAL AID CHAPTER 123
JURISDICTION OVER LANDS ACQUIRED; TAX EXEMPTION Section 123:1, 123:1
Ceded to United States.
– Jurisdiction is ceded to the United States of America over all lands
within this state now or hereafter exclusively owned by the United
States, and used as sites for post offices, custom-houses, military air
bases, military installations or other public buildings: provided, that
an accurate description and plan of the lands so owned and occupied,
verified by the oath of some officer of the United States having
knowledge of the facts, shall be filed with the secretary of this
state; and, provided, further, that this cession is upon the express
condition that the state of New Hampshire shall retain concurrent
jurisdiction with the United States in and over all such lands, so far
that all civil and criminal process issuing under the authority of this
state may be executed on the said lands and in any building now or
hereafter erected thereon, in the same way and with the same effect as
if this statute had not been enacted; and that exclusive jurisdiction
shall revert to and revest in this state whenever the lands shall cease
to be the property of the United States
and

C. 40 U.S.C. §
255. This statute requires the head or authorized officer of the agency
acquiring or holding property to file with the state a formal
acceptance of such "jurisdiction, exclusive or partial as he may deem
desirable," and further provides that in the absence of such filing "it
shall be conclusively presumed that no such jurisdiction has been
acquired." See Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (district court is
without jurisdiction to prosecute soldiers for rape committed on an
army base prior to filing of acceptance prescribed by statute). The
requirement of 40 U.S.C. § 255 can also be fulfilled by any filing satisfying state law…

Any
order originating from The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW
HAMPSHIRE pertaining to the holding, transferring, detaining, or
securing of Cirino Gonzalez, described as “Cirino Gonzalez 76342-179”
in, from, or to FCI EL RENO FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, EL RENO,
OKLAHOMA is unlawful, illegal, and civilly negligent.

1.
You are hereby served NOTICE that your continued adherence to this
unlawful order is deemed as your knowing and WILLFUL PARTICIPATION in
violation of Texas, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and United States
Constitutional laws including but not limited to KIDNAPPING, UNLAWFUL
IMPRISONMENT, ASSAULT, violation of the LINBERGH ACT of 1932.
2.
In connection with this violation YOU may/will be held personally
criminally and financially liable for YOUR WILLFUL participation in
said violations beyond that covered by your official bond/insurance as
per your employment status.
3.
As Cirino Gonzalez is being held illegally, his treatment within any
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION should be equal to that of a free
Texan. Any incidents violating his civil rights will be considered as
additional to all other charges against YOU and multiplied for each day
he is held unlawfully there after. The rules as listed on the November
18, 2005 Visiting Regulations apply to legally committed inmates. As
Cirino Gonzalez is not “legally committed” and he may, at his own
discretion comply with those rules but is not to be required to comply
therewith, or with any other rules of any FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION and any restrictions WHATSOEVER imposed upon Cirino
Gonzalez will be deemed as cruel and unusual punishment, for which YOU
will be held personally CRIMINALLY, civilly, and financially liable for
YOUR WILLFUL participation beyond that covered by your official
bond/insurance as per your employment status.
4.
Until Cirino Gonzalez is released, your continued employment in the El
Reno FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION constitutes WILLFUL participation
in the crimes related against Cirino Gonzalez.
5.
Until Cirino Gonzalez is released, your continued employment in the El
Reno FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION constitutes WILLFUL failure to
stop/prevent a crime as required by the LAWFUL Constitutions of Texas,
New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and/or The United States of America.
6.
Until Cirino Gonzalez is released, your continued employment in the El
Reno FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION constitutes WILLFUL failure to
render aid as required by the LAWFUL Constitutions of Texas, New
Hampshire, Oklahoma, and/or The United States of America.
7.
Until Cirino Gonzalez is released, your continued employment in the El
Reno FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION constitutes WILLFUL aiding and
abetting or accessory by the LAWFUL Constitutions of Texas, New
Hampshire, Oklahoma, and/or The United States of America.
8.
Until Cirino Gonzalez is released, your continued employment in the El
Reno FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION constitutes WILLFUL DOMESTIC
TERRORISM as defined by the LAWFUL Constitutions of Texas, New
Hampshire, Oklahoma, and/or The United States of America
9. Each
twenty-four (24) hour period after the delivery of this NOTICE (as
acknowledged by United States Postal Service Certified mail Return
Receipt # 7008 2810 0001 0429 6198) during which Cirino Gonzalez
remains unlawfully held in El Reno FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
constitutes an additional CHARGE against YOU.
10.
Failure to be informed of this NOTICE may constitute a claim on YOUR
part against your supervisor(s) but does not release you from the
LIABILITIES herein described.
11.
Failure to INFORM other EMPLOYEES, ASSOCIATES, CONTRACTORS, and/or
MANAGEMENT constitutes OBSTRUCTION of PROCEEDINGS as prescribed by the
LAWFUL Constitutions of Texas, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, and/or The
United States of America.
12. Failure to take action upon receipt of this letter constitutes a violation of your OATH.


Rebuttal to this NOTICE via a sworn/..NOTARIZED
statement, under penalty of PERJURY, will be accepted only within 30
days after delivery of this NOTICE (as per United States Postal Service
Certified mail Return Receipt # 7008 2810 0001 0429 6198).
Delivery to one is considered delivery to ALL.






_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..______________ _________
Jose M. Gonzalez Date

This document was acknowledged before me on _____________ (date)

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(Signature of notary officer) Seal/Stamp:

_.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._______________
(Print name notary officer)My commission expires:..__________

[Famspear]

Uh-oh....

[ . . . . ] including but not limited to KIDNAPPING, UNLAWFUL
IMPRISONMENT, ASSAULT, violation of the LINBERGH ACT of 1932.

It's the "LINDBERGH" Act, not "LINBERGH."

Curses! Another delusional rant invalidated by poor spelling!

[Demosthenes]

Uh-oh....

[ . . . . ] including but not limited to KIDNAPPING, UNLAWFUL
IMPRISONMENT, ASSAULT, violation of the LINBERGH ACT of 1932.

It's the "LINDBERGH" Act, not "LINBERGH."

Curses! Another delusional rant invalidated by poor spelling!

That's 'cause Jose didn't read this book:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0828319715/

And yes, the author of this book is indeed the same US Marshal Stephen Monier that Ed Brown and his supporters wanted to kill...

[Famspear]

Uh-oh....

[ . . . . ] including but not limited to KIDNAPPING, UNLAWFUL
IMPRISONMENT, ASSAULT, violation of the LINBERGH ACT of 1932.

It's the "LINDBERGH" Act, not "LINBERGH."

Curses! Another delusional rant invalidated by poor spelling!

That's 'cause Jose didn't read this book:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0828319715/

And yes, the author of this book is indeed the same US Marshal Stephen Monier that Ed Brown and his supporters wanted to kill...

Wow. Weird coincidence.

[Famspear]

Demo, I get the impression that you have huge, detailed files on everybody associated with any kind of fraud or scam anywhere, as well as files on all the good guys, like Monier. Remind me to stay on your good side .......

[VanMeters Revenge]

I really don't see how this can be considered a threat by Reno's daddy with these filings. Any ways, Jose says,
"Thank them for me & ask them to make sure the judge understands it." since you rub elbows with the overlords.

[Arthur Rubin]

I really don't see how this can be considered a threat by Reno's daddy with these filings. Any ways, Jose says,
"Thank them for me & ask them to make sure the judge understands it." since you rub elbows with the overlords.

I don't see how it could be considered other than a threat.

[Arthur Rubin]

Besides, there is no 40 USC 255.

[Judge Roy Bean]

I really don't see how this can be considered a threat by Reno's daddy with these filings. Any ways, Jose says,
"Thank them for me & ask them to make sure the judge understands it." since you rub elbows with the overlords.

I don't see how it could be considered other than a threat.

A threat of what? Release him or we'll type up more gibberish?

I think this is little more than another misguided action intended to be a message for the sycophants in what's left of the mob.

[notorial dissent]

And they say stupidity isn’t inherited, the only question is which way did it go in this family?

[.]

Jose never seems to tire of making a fool of himself. It's not hard to imagine how a few more iterations of his ever-increasing lunacy might land him in a federal prison cell.

While many people have probably told him to quit while he's behind and put a sock in it, somehow I doubt that will ever have any effect. Meanwhile, we watch yet another delusional self-destruction.

[Demosthenes]

I really don't see how this can be considered a threat by Reno's daddy with these filings. Any ways, Jose says,
"Thank them for me & ask them to make sure the judge understands it." since you rub elbows with the overlords.

The judge will understand just fine that Jose's filing is paytriot crap.

[Nikki]

Next step if no one responds to Jose's demands.

He threatens to sit on the court house steps and hold his breath until he turns blue.

Of course, no one will take this seriously, etiher, unless he includes the threat to do it while wearing a toga.

[notorial dissent]

Other than being exceeding painful to read, as this kind of nonsense almost always is, what does the Federal Court in New Hampshire not being in compliance with whatever it is he thinks it is not in compliance with, have to do with the holding facility in OK??? That one I am having a hard time grasping.

The rest is just the usual gibberish.

[Dezcad]

Reno's daddy's latest youtube about this "Notice" - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39OTRVDTJuA

[grixit]

Worst. Cheech. Impression. Ever!

[Nikki]

Fess up, Webhick. What experiment were you running on him THIS time?

[webhick]

Fess up, Webhick. What experiment were you running on him THIS time?

I'm not running any experiments on him. And if he wants it to stop, then he has to quit sleeping with his mouth open or else the tie-dyed hamsters will not relent in seasoning his tongue like furry little salt shakers.

[webhick]

Fess up, Webhick. What experiment were you running on him THIS time?

Rumor has it that it involved gerbils, Sweet-tarts and helium and possibly tequila.......

Right rumor, wrong application.

[Gregg]

One word:

mentos