Van Pelt or Merrill that is the question

Imalawman · Post by **Imalawman** » Tue May 08, 2007 9:26 pm

Since David seems to think addressing this question would be off topic, I've now made it a topic.

In another thread, David pointed to a common law ruling which he claimed he was at and participated in. However, "David Merrill" as he is known to call himself, never signed the document. Most peculiar is the signature of a "David Van Pelt" - the sworn enemy and shadow of the so named, "David Merrill". This begs the obvious question, "David, did you lie about being at the common law trial or did you sign your name as David Van Pelt and thereby acknowledge that to be your legal name?"

The world of Quatloos waits with abated breath for your answer.

Post by **webhick** » Wed May 09, 2007 12:16 am

Alright, who's the jokester registering different variations of "David Van Pelt"?

David Van Pelt
DAVID; VAN - PELT
David of the Van ;#$ Pelt
Davidus Vanus Peltus

Post by **Demosthenes** » Wed May 09, 2007 12:23 am

Don't forget the big one

David Merrill: house of Van Pelt

Lambkin · Post by **Lambkin** » Wed May 09, 2007 12:29 am

webhick wrote:DAVID; VAN - PELT

Sometimes the semi-colon gets drunk and passes out, then you have

DAVID., VAN - PELT

Post by **webhick** » Wed May 09, 2007 2:37 am

Jeez, I go off to play Riven for a few hours and there's more:

The Aritst Known as DVP
D to the V to the P, yo
My father Pelt Me Up

That last one made me laugh out loud.

Cobalt Shiva · Post by **Cobalt Shiva** » Wed May 09, 2007 4:48 pm

D to the V to the P, yo

Word to: your-mother

r/s,

Cobalt Shiva, In Da House

grammarian44 · Post by **grammarian44** » Wed May 09, 2007 4:53 pm

Demo pointed out to me some time ago that David is mentally ill--and not just neurotic, but psychotic. I've since become convinced of this. I think we ought to just leave him alone--ignore him, but leave him alone.

silversopp · Post by **silversopp** » Thu May 10, 2007 6:59 pm

grammarian44 wrote:Demo pointed out to me some time ago that David is mentally ill--and not just neurotic, but psychotic. I've since become convinced of this. I think we ought to just leave him alone--ignore him, but leave him alone.

The guy listed his motor scooter as a plaintiff in a case. What more does one need Demo to point out?

Red Cedar PM · Post by **Red Cedar PM** » Thu May 10, 2007 9:32 pm

grammarian44 wrote:Demo pointed out to me some time ago that David is mentally ill--and not just neurotic, but psychotic. I've since become convinced of this. I think we ought to just leave him alone--ignore him, but leave him alone.

Normally I would agree, however, since he has seen fit to try to sell his "termination" method to marks and try to use this forum as a place to hawk his nonsense, I think he deserves every bit of ridicule and discrediting given to him. If it will save one person from losing their shirt, then hurting that nutball's feelings is well worth it.

Post by **The Observer** » Thu May 10, 2007 10:57 pm

It is most interesting that David has ignored a topic with his name in it for the last couple of days.

Post by **notorial dissent** » Fri May 11, 2007 12:33 am

Nothing much unusual.

Merrill doesn't like being caught in one of his lies when he can't find some way of obfuscating around it and claiming something else. The problem is that he tells so many he can no longer keep track of them all.

He also doesn't like facts that inconveniently contradict his particularly warped view of the universe.

In short, he's right and you're wrong, and he gets very upset when no one agrees with him.

Disilloosianed · Post by **Disilloosianed** » Fri May 11, 2007 12:48 pm

Awww, come on....if the government can get away with this sort of silliness:

United States District Court,
C.D. Illinois.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
TWO MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND TWO DOLLARS AND TWENTY-SEVEN CENTS ($2,767,202.27) IN U.S. CURRENCY, Respondent.

No. 03-1289.

Nov. 8, 2006.

why can't David's motor scooter sue someone?
[/quote]

silversopp · Post by **silversopp** » Fri May 11, 2007 1:47 pm

Disilloosianed wrote:Awww, come on....if the government can get away with this sort of silliness:

United States District Court,
C.D. Illinois.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
TWO MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND TWO DOLLARS AND TWENTY-SEVEN CENTS ($2,767,202.27) IN U.S. CURRENCY, Respondent.

No. 03-1289.

Nov. 8, 2006.

why can't David's motor scooter sue someone?

[/quote]

I didn't mean to imply that the United States was not mentally challenged as well.

Post by **The Observer** » Fri May 11, 2007 2:43 pm

Disilloosianed wrote:Awww, come on....if the government can get away with this sort of silliness:

United States District Court,
C.D. Illinois.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
TWO MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND TWO DOLLARS AND TWENTY-SEVEN CENTS ($2,767,202.27) IN U.S. CURRENCY, Respondent.

No. 03-1289.

Nov. 8, 2006.

why can't David's motor scooter sue someone?

I think what was being questioned was the motor scooter's sanity in filing a suit with David as co-plaintiff. The chances of the motor scooter prevailing in court would have increased dramatically if it had filed suit separately.

Doktor Avalanche · Post by **Doktor Avalanche** » Wed May 16, 2007 3:49 am

United States District Court,
C.D. Illinois.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
TWO MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-SEVEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND TWO DOLLARS AND TWENTY-SEVEN CENTS ($2,767,202.27) IN U.S. CURRENCY, Respondent.

No. 03-1289.

Nov. 8, 2006.

My personal favorite:

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
FORTY-SEVEN CASES OF FIREARMS, Respondent.

Deo dandum at it's finest, ladies and gentlemen.

Doktor Avalanche · Post by **Doktor Avalanche** » Wed May 16, 2007 4:28 am

CaptainKickback wrote:Wasn't Deo Dandum an early NY Mets player? Played shortstop I think and was of the same era and talent as Marvelous Marv Throneberry......

The Deo Dandum I was referring to was a bastard to his wife and kids, delighted in kicking babies and small dogs, made unscrupulous remarks that claimed (amongst other things) the ketchup packet was a plot hatched by O.J. Simpson in cahoots with the John Birch Society and the Trilateral Commission. He once ran a lemming farm by the white cliffs of Dover.

On a sidebar, he had a tremendous singing voice.

Doktor Avalanche · Post by **Doktor Avalanche** » Wed May 16, 2007 8:29 am

silversopp wrote:
grammarian44 wrote:Demo pointed out to me some time ago that David is mentally ill--and not just neurotic, but psychotic. I've since become convinced of this. I think we ought to just leave him alone--ignore him, but leave him alone.
The guy listed his motor scooter as a plaintiff in a case. What more does one need Demo to point out?

. o O (Oh no, he didn't!)

Nikki · Post by **Nikki** » Wed May 16, 2007 12:51 pm

The suit was dismissed by the presiding judge following a court-ordered competency hearing which only the scooter passed.

Post by **Demosthenes** » Wed May 16, 2007 12:57 pm

Doktor Avalanche wrote:
silversopp wrote:
grammarian44 wrote:Demo pointed out to me some time ago that David is mentally ill--and not just neurotic, but psychotic. I've since become convinced of this. I think we ought to just leave him alone--ignore him, but leave him alone.
The guy listed his motor scooter as a plaintiff in a case. What more does one need Demo to point out?
. o O (Oh no, he didn't!)

And the motor scooter was suing Jesus Christ.

Imalawman · Post by **Imalawman** » Wed May 16, 2007 1:31 pm

Demosthenes wrote:
Doktor Avalanche wrote:
silversopp wrote: The guy listed his motor scooter as a plaintiff in a case. What more does one need Demo to point out?
. o O (Oh no, he didn't!)
And the motor scooter was suing Jesus Christ.

Ah yes, motor scooter v. Jesus Christ - an instant classic in insane lawsuits. One of my favorites.