“I am not an attorney, and I have no knowledge of Francis Wharton.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Wharton
Regurgitation (puke) has an alternate spelling, "W-E-S-T-O-N W-H-I-T-E."
And Quatloos.com has an alternate meaning: “M-E-N-I-A-L R-E-T-A-I-N-E-R”
“The income tax (in it's current fom) is fast approaching its 100th birthday. You'd think that tax deniers would figure out it's here to stay...
The tax denier "movement" has been desperately trying to find a way out of the current tax system for more than 40 years. You'd think that tax deniers would figure out that they haven't made a single advance in all those decades...”
Great and once again most of us have no issue with the income tax itself. The only real issue is its all encompassing misapplication. That is where the debate exists. The income tax in its correct application could say for a thousand years more, so long as Congress does not overbear its application, such as constantly raising and raising the percentages, which seems to be the pattern. Regardless its misapplication needs to cease. Taxing something a person does is only to be legally under the form of direct taxation.
I find it very telling that all of you persistently insist on smearing this same malignant point over and over and over, serving as an attempt only to create your very own red herring to chase down… All the while being remiss to what the actual debate is all about.
We do not say the income tax needs to be terminated, we do not say that income taxes are direct taxes, we do not say that the income is not wages, we do not make those or other similar arguments as you all so readily chant like a Yale Bonesman on initiation night. 3-2-2! 3-2-2! 3-2-2! all hail the glorious and magnificent, the all knowing and powerful
322!