WTP "Historic Lawsuit" Dismissed by DC Circuit

[Nikki]

Dear NeoInsultinator David:

SFB -- that same link was available on this site the same day it was published.

Again, you're a day late and an FRN short.

[David Merrill]

Dear NeoInsultinator David:

Shit For Brains -- that same link was available on this site the same day it was published.

Again, you're a day late and an FRN short.

I guess you are just no quite smart enough to get the point then. Imagine these We the People people wondering why they were hearing about the Appeal flopping from somebody who has never been in We the People?

And I even gave the organizers a strong hint that I would be breaking the news if they didn't. And even then, I waited until the end of my lecture to do it.



Regards,

David Merrill.



P.S.

Laughs at you Nikki; this is the only other place the link is available at all...

http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/com ... -5359a.pdf

Powers denied individual states. (1) No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance or confederation; grant letters of marque or reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts...

No wonder there are no sanctions. And of course it is a victory because the Constitution the We the People folks love so dearly was upheld. Endorsement of private credit is a private contract and by process of law, the federal constitution would not prevent states for impairing contracts if it was going to impair contracts itself, would it?

http://friends-n-family-research.info/F ... cMoney.wmv

Like I say in my video; the agreement is not unconstitutional - it is non-constitutional. Argueing on the basis of the First Amendment makes no more sense than Bob Shultz saying he is a citizen of the US and then saying he is the People; all in the same breath.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Judge Roy Bean]

I'll bet all eleven of them were stunned.

[David Merrill]

I'll bet all eleven of them were stunned.

Thanks JRB;


Sometimes with Nikki it seems I am speaking a foreign language or something.



Regards,

David Merrill.

[Joey Smith]

David Merrill wrote:

Sometimes with Nikki it seems I am speaking a foreign language or something.

* * * KEYBOARD WARNINGS PLEASE ! ! ! * * *

David, your speech makes little sense to anybody not living on Planet Merrill. As somebody who is very well educated in American history and particularly the history of the courts, I can vouch that your "speech" is to string together unassociated words, many of which have never been used by anybody except the unlearned in the manner in which you attempt to use them.

[.]

Perhaps the voices he hears are multi-lingual.

[David Merrill]

David, your speech makes little sense to anybody not living on Planet Merrill. As somebody who is very well educated in American history and particularly the history of the courts, I can vouch that your "speech" is to string together unassociated words, many of which have never been used by anybody except the unlearned in the manner in which you attempt to use them.

Only because you are not familiar, or are in denial of the Rules that begin with Letters...


http://www.freedom-school.com/the-1994-ebsworth.pdf

But the late depression era was one of great social activism on the part of the Federal government, and this faded seamlessly into wartime legislation which appropriated control of private property.

http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images/su ... rrant1.gif
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images/su ... rrant2.gif

I directed the return of $75K in funds by Verified Statement of Right/Interest after the funds were seized...

The fellow had some pocketchange in one account and when his card failed he thought, "Dear God; not again??"

He went inside and the bank had all his funds returned to all three accounts. The bank wanted him to sign a waiver of indemnity toward the bank before he could access his funds. By the time we were through laughing the bank was covering all bounced checks, fees and writing letters of apology!



Joey;

You have never impressed me as being very well educated about history or law.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Paul]

You have never impressed me as being very well educated about history or law.

Here's a clue, David: if he guffaws at your posts, he's educated in history and law.

[David Merrill]

And therefore he would simply be ignoring them because of all the links to law and history, the Congressional Record etc...

[Paul]

. . . which, when read, prove that you haven't got a clue what they say.

[David Merrill]

. . . which, when read, prove that you haven't got a clue what they say.

Here's a fun example of your denial:

http://Friends-n-Family-Research.info/F ... 94-412.jpg
http://Friends-n-Family-Research.info/F ... lation.jpg

[sucker4lush]

David Merrill, don't forget- it's a link about history, but not about law- with congress being forever reconvened by the commander-in-chief and all...
...A martial congress dictating the C-I-C's emergency declaring power... Brainfart!

Thanks for everybody continuing the tradition of jokes about David Merrill hearing voices- since my daily/hourly nemesis is Top 40 music stuck in my head- they always remind me of my fave line from my fave song, from the best band ever:

Ocean, by lush ( 1:27- 2:00)

" ...Take me down
down where their voices drown
down where the only sound
echoes for me..."

http://h1.ripway.com/sucker4lush/lush-Ocean.mp3

[David Merrill]

David Merrill, don't forget- it's a link about history, but not about law- with congress being forever reconvened by the commander-in-chief and all...
...A martial congress dictating the C-I-C's emergency declaring power... Brainfart!

Thanks for everybody continuing the tradition of jokes about David Merrill hearing voices- since my daily/hourly nemesis is Top 40 music stuck in my head- they always remind me of my fave line from my fave song, from the best band ever:

Ocean, by lush ( 1:27- 2:00)

" ...Take me down
down where their voices drown
down where the only sound
echoes for me..."

http://h1.ripway.com/sucker4lush/lush-Ocean.mp3

Thank you for the reminder. I like to remain on point and it would seem that even addressing Abraham LINCOLN's extraordinary occasion of July 4, 1861 is a difficult topic of the Constitution to broach.

A decade ago in Wichita, we learned the easy way. Too bad Bob was not there. He would have simply become a court of competent jurisdiction instead of looking around for one at a bunch of hopeful peoples' expense.

Amazing how the same old dogpile can still teach me things... I miss AndyK though.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Nikki]

... I miss AndyK though.

Why?

Are you running out of questions to obfuscate, evade, or flat-out ignore?

[David Merrill]

... I miss AndyK though.

Why?

Are you running out of questions to obfuscate, evade, or flat-out ignore?

AndyK is a trained CID Treasury agent. He provided a lot of great intelligence.


Regards,

David Merrill.

[Disilloosianed]

grammarian wrote:

Lately WTP seems to be more of a vehicle for thinly-veiled anti-semitism than an outlet for tax protestors.

Well, the tax protesting part appears to be going really badly. Funny, when you think of it, WTP is using the Nazi party approach: Turn your populus away from its own problems by focusing anger on someone else. (And they've picked the same target....amazing.)

[Duke2Earl]

... I miss AndyK though.

Why?

Are you running out of questions to obfuscate, evade, or flat-out ignore?

AndyK is a trained CID Treasury agent. He provided a lot of great intelligence.


Regards,

David Merrill.

Lord knows you need some intelligence from somewhere.

[Kimokeo]

The right to petition, naming your grievances.

But, no right to an answer.

You may complain but don't expect anything.

[Demosthenes]

John Roland on WTP Appeal

John Roland on WTP Appeal

Jon Roland writes: Unfortunately, as I have often argued, including in my speech to the WTP national conference March 31 http://www.constitution.org/col/jdr/gml2007.ppt, the case has been wrongly argued, so that the court is essentially correct on the main point of whether the Right to Petition carries a right to get an answer. As for "sovereign immunity", that doctrine and the precedents cited to support it are in conflict with the ancient right of quo warranto, which would be a Ninth Amendment right, not a First Amendment right. See Presumption of Nonauthority and Unenumerated Rights, http://www.constitution.org/9ll/schol/pnur.htm. But the opinion in this case show how the quo warranto right and the presumption of nonauthority has been effectively subverted and made inaccessible as a remedy.

Now of course the courts cannot be expected to make a just decision on this issue even if it were argued correctly. It's main value is as political theater, to demonstrate to those still on the sidelines that government is off the constitutional track, and that we can no longer look to the courts for remedies. However, it doesn't help when critics can say, "You lost because it wasn't argued competently." Mark Lane is a good guy, but he was out of his depth for this case.

Here is the recent decision in the WTP "right to petition" lawsuit: click here.
----------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society
7793 Burnet Road #37,
Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001 http://www.constitution.org
mailto:jon.roland@constitution.org

[David Merrill]

In the spirit of the Constitutional provision alone, it is time to overthrow King George III's vestigial prodogy. So Roland is out of his depth too.

We have these lunatics saying, "There is no law."

The law is right there in the Constitution; no state can abrogate the obligations of contracts. The Fed is no agency of the US. In some cases, the Court has ruled the Fed an instrumentality - but that is not an agency.

The USA is only obligated to answer for its agencies. Not for the Fed. Look in your wallet if you want to see what a Federal Reserve Bank stock certificate looks like.




Regards,

David Merrill.