WTP "Historic Lawsuit" Dismissed by DC Circuit

A collection of old posts from all forums. No new threads or new posts in old threads allowed. For archive use only.
David Merrill

Post by David Merrill »

Cobalt Shiva wrote:
FED Stock can be transferred between banks.
Between member banks.
And to be a banker you must have some FED Stock.
No, that is not a correct statement.

I believe it is correct according to the Supreme Court.
Cobalt Shiva
Black Seas Commodore Designate
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Where the Grass is Green and the Girls Are Pretty

Post by Cobalt Shiva »

David Merrill wrote:
Cobalt Shiva wrote:
FED Stock can be transferred between banks.
Between member banks.
And to be a banker you must have some FED Stock.
No, that is not a correct statement.

I believe it is correct according to the Supreme Court.
Case citation, please.
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Post by notorial dissent »

You are both wrong, quite wrong, absolutely wrong!!!!!!!!!!

Merrill is no surprise, the surprise would be if he ever got something right.

Shiva, shame on you, contact with Merrill is rotting your mind.

There is no such item as “Fed Stock” to begin with. Each member BANK, that is BANK, not person, not individuals, not anything else, but BANK, owns a small, fixed percentage share of the local Fed Reserve Dist Bank. It is a requirement to use the Federal Reserve System, and it is required that ALL banks be members of the Federal Reserve. The share ownership is not transferable, not tradable, not assignable, and not saleable, it is the equivalent of a joint stock membership society. You have to have stock to be a member, and you can’t be a member without stock. It is strictly a book keeping entry, and if the bank ceases to exist so does their stock.

FRNs are not stock certificates, they are not checks, they are not IOU’s or any other bit of Merrillian nonsense, they are legal tender US currency and so designated by statute.
David Merrill

Post by David Merrill »

For all intents and purposes we are discussing FRNs as elastic. Creating elastic currency is a fancy way of saying counterfeiting money.

There must be a bond behind that elasticity since it only stretches in one direction. Like Cobalt's expanding mind...





Regards,

David Merrill.
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Post by LPC »

David Merrill wrote:For all intents and purposes we are discussing FRNs as elastic. Creating elastic currency is a fancy way of saying counterfeiting money.

There must be a bond behind that elasticity since it only stretches in one direction. Like Cobalt's expanding mind...

Regards,

David Merrill.
Only 14 more posts and I can lock this thread. I'm really looking forward to it.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Post by LPC »

Make that 13.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

LPC wrote:
David Merrill wrote:For all intents and purposes we are discussing FRNs as elastic. Creating elastic currency is a fancy way of saying counterfeiting money.

There must be a bond behind that elasticity since it only stretches in one direction. Like Cobalt's expanding mind...

Regards,

David Merrill.
Only 14 more posts and I can lock this thread. I'm really looking forward to it.
Now you can reduce it to twelve. 8)
Last edited by Doktor Avalanche on Wed May 16, 2007 1:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros
David Merrill

Post by David Merrill »

endorsement is the supersedeas bond.
Florida

Post by Florida »

David Merrill wrote:endorsement is the supersedeas bond.
Image

Drugs?
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

Florida wrote:
David Merrill wrote:endorsement is the supersedeas bond.
Image

Drugs?
Wow! He bears a striking resemblance to Charlie Sheen.
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros
User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3994
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am

Post by webhick »

Doktor Avalanche wrote:
Florida wrote:
David Merrill wrote:endorsement is the supersedeas bond.
Image

Drugs?
Wow! He bears a striking resemblance to Charlie Sheen.
Or that guy who married Denise Richards. ;)
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Post by notorial dissent »

LPC wrote:Make that 13.
Please can we go a little faster.
User avatar
webhick
Illuminati Obfuscation: Black Ops Div
Posts: 3994
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:41 am

Post by webhick »

notorial dissent wrote:
LPC wrote:Make that 13.
Please can we go a little faster.
Can't. Union rules. I'm only allowed to pretend to contribute when my mental instability peaks. It happens several times a day.
When chosen for jury duty, tell the judge "fortune cookie says guilty" - A fortune cookie
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7624
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Post by wserra »

notorial dissent wrote:Please can we go a little faster.
[Homer]Mmmmm . . . Denise Richards.[/Homer]

Image

If that doesn't make it go faster, I don't know what will.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

wserra wrote:
notorial dissent wrote:Please can we go a little faster.
[Homer]Mmmmm . . . Denise Richards.[/Homer]

Image

If that doesn't make it go faster, I don't know what will.
My heart is beating faster. Does that count?
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros
sucker4lush

Meanwhile, Back in the Schoolyard...

Post by sucker4lush »

...Someone calling herself Doktor Avalanche teases someone else for using his real given name...Others join...
sucker4lush

Post by sucker4lush »

One of the voices in David Merrill's head:
...any time we wish to add to the national wealth, we are compelled to add to the national debt.
Thomas Edison
sucker4lush

Post by sucker4lush »

Another of the voices in David Merrill's head:
Fiscal and monetary policies are just euphemisms for debt creation.
Prof. Ravi Batra
sucker4lush

Post by sucker4lush »

Another voice in David Merrill's head:
...And when they run out of money, our elected leaders just print more. You know what they call that in middle America? Counterfeiting.
Joe Scarborough
sucker4lush

Post by sucker4lush »

Another incoherent babbling voice:
Where did the money come from? It came- and this is the most important single thing to know about modern banking- it came out of thin air. Commercial banks- that is, fractional reserve banks- create money out of thin air. Essentially they do it in the same way as counterfeiters. Counterfeiters, too, create money out of thin air by printing something masquerading as money or as a wherehouse receipt for money. In this way, they fraudulently extract resources from the public, from the people who have genuinely earned their money. In the same way, fractional reserve banks counterfeit wherehouse receipts for money, which then circulate as equivalent to money among the public. There is only one exception to the equivalence. The law fails to treat the receipts as counterfeit.
It should be clear that modern fractional reserve banking is a shell game, a Ponzi scheme, a fraud in which fake wherehouse receipts are issued and circulate as equivalent to the cash supposedly represented by the receipts.
Prof. Murray Rothbard