Actually, I can name two who (have stated they) are willing to provide proof that they make that much. Can you supply that many for Quixtar?GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Care to show me the people who do that and make over two grand a month part time, month after month?Arthur Rubin wrote:No problem, if you're on shopping.com, or one of the other pay-for-review consumer sites.GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Third, and most important, brand-X won't pay me to use/recommend their products!
Verifying Scammers' Income
Moderator: wserra
-
- Tupa-O-Quatloosia
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
- Location: Brea, CA
Verifying Scammers' Income
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Care to show me the people who do that and make over two grand a month part time, month after month?Arthur Rubin wrote:No problem, if you're on shopping.com, or one of the other pay-for-review consumer sites.GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Third, and most important, brand-X won't pay me to use/recommend their products!
Only two.Arthur Rubin wrote: Actually, I can name two who (have stated they) are willing to provide proof that they make that much. Can you supply that many for Quixtar?
I can supply you with a source of names of at least several dozen, along with instructions of how to verify what they are averaging per month.
That's "d" as in dozen and done deal.
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Why don't you just tell us how one would go about "verifying" the information?GoldandSilverEagles wrote:I can supply you with a source of names of at least several dozen, along with instructions of how to verify what they are averaging per month.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
"...* The average bonus and cash payments earned by a Q12 Platinum, an IBO who qualifies at the Platinum level all 12 months of the year, were $47,472.*..."wserra wrote:Why don't you just tell us how one would go about "verifying" the information?GoldandSilverEagles wrote:I can supply you with a source of names of at least several dozen, along with instructions of how to verify what they are averaging per month.
http://www.thisbiznow.com/quixtar/ibo_statistics.html
Since IBO's are working full time occupations while they are at the Platinum level, it stands to reason they only dedicated a part time effort to achieve and maintain their businesses at the Platinum level.
I've talked with countless Platinums. Not one has ever told me they built their Platinumship on a full time basis, time wise. When built properly, It's not required.
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Sorry, "it stands to reason" =! verification. Lawyers have to verify others' income all the time, and laugh at the idea of "standing to reason". An authorization to obtain records from an employer/payor works, as does an authorization to the IRS for income tax filings.
Why is it that, despite every MLM scammer and his cousin bragging about (and recruiting based on) their supposed wealth, real verification is never forthcoming?
Why is it that, despite every MLM scammer and his cousin bragging about (and recruiting based on) their supposed wealth, real verification is never forthcoming?
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Dude, you are way-y too full of yourself.wserra wrote:Sorry, "it stands to reason" =! verification. Lawyers have to verify others' income all the time, and laugh at the idea of "standing to reason". An authorization to obtain records from an employer/payor works, as does an authorization to the IRS for income tax filings.
Why is it that, despite every MLM scammer and his cousin bragging about (and recruiting based on) their supposed wealth, real verification is never forthcoming?
Though I do recognize that someone like yourself is trained and geared 2wards looking at life through the rose colored glasses of being **legally correct**.
Now for a dose of reality, Mr. lawyer, Amway, became a multi-billion $$ world-wide Corporation in light of cynics like yourself, and they did it legally, with the exception of a few bumps here and there.
"Since IBO's are working full time occupations while they are at the Platinum level, it stands to reason they only dedicated a part time effort to achieve and maintain their businesses at the Platinum level."
My claim is far from laughable, ridiculous.
However, If you insist that my claim is in fact ridiculous, then I encourage and welcome for you to prove me wrong.
And I'll make it relatively simple for you:
There are Amway functions in New York. Attend one, and locate some Platinum's and ask them, for yourself, how many hours a week they invested in their businesses to achieve the Platinum level.
Or do you prefer to sit back in your laziness and big ego behind your PC and monitor and insist in demonstrating contempt prior to investigation, your own personal investigation that is?
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
GoldandSilverEagles wrote:I can supply you with a source of names of at least several dozen, along with instructions of how to verify what they are averaging per month.
wserra wrote:Why don't you just tell us how one would go about "verifying" the information?
GoldandSilverEagles wrote:it stands to reason they....
wserra wrote:Sorry, "it stands to reason" =! verification .... Why is it that, despite every MLM scammer and his cousin bragging about (and recruiting based on) their supposed wealth, real verification is never forthcoming?
Recap:GoldandSilverEagles wrote:If you insist that my claim is in fact ridiculous, then I encourage and welcome for you to prove me wrong.
GASP: I can prove X.
WS: Go ahead. X is something that must be proven in the real world quite often, and is done easily, with readily obtainable documents.
GASP: Accept certain dubious premises. X then stands to reason.
WS: That's not proof.
GASP: Oh, yeah? Prove me wrong.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Tupa-O-Quatloosia
- Posts: 1756
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
- Location: Brea, CA
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
As I've said before, my two have offered proof. You haven't yet claimed that your dmmies offered proof, although, you've now claimed that they've offered a way you can verify the statements. Fine. Let me know when you've verified them, and let us known what the verification method is.GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Arthur Rubin wrote: Care to show me the people who do that and make over two grand a month part time, month after month?Only two.Arthur Rubin wrote: Actually, I can name two who (have stated they) are willing to provide proof that they make that much. Can you supply that many for Quixtar?
I can supply you with a source of names of at least several dozen, along with instructions of how to verify what they are averaging per month.
That's "d" as in dozen and done deal.
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Arthur Rubin wrote: As I've said before, my two have offered proof. You haven't yet claimed that your dmmies offered proof, although, you've now claimed that they've offered a way you can verify the statements. Fine. Let me know when you've verified them, and let us known what the verification method is.
* IBOs earned $370.1 million in bonuses and incentives in fiscal 2006, bringing their seven-year total to more than $1.72 billion.
* More than 370,000 Independent Business Owners received a bonus in FY 05.
* The average bonus and cash payments earned by a Diamond IBO in 2005 were $146,995.*
* The average bonus and cash payments earned by an Emerald in 2005 were $72,241.*
* The average bonus and cash payments earned by a Q12 Platinum, an IBO who qualifies at the Platinum level all 12 months of the year, were $47,472.*
* The largest annual bonus earned by a Diamond IBO in 2005 was $1,083,421.
* The largest annual bonus earned by an Emerald IBO in 2005 was $688,869.
http://www.thisbiznow.com/quixtar/ibo_statistics.html
"...* The average bonus and cash payments earned by a Q12 Platinum, an IBO who qualifies at the Platinum level all 12 months of the year, were $47,472.*.."
IBO's invest a part time effort to achieve the Platinum level. Contact an Amway Global IBO in your area and ask to review their current issues of the Amway magazine, "Achieve". 2wards the back of the magazine is an area dedicated to recognition of achievement. It is very common to see several pictures of IBO's (along with their names and where they are from,) that have (recently) achieve the Platinum level.
I've met and talked with countless Platinums. No one has ever told me they put in anything more than a part time effort to Achieve the Platinum.
Now, how can you verify my claims? Simple. Locate a public opportunity meeting put on by some Amway IBO's. There not hard to find, just ask IBO's in your area. When you attend the meeting, ask people where you can find the "Platinum's". When you are introduced to some, ask them, for yourself, if what I'm saying is true.
It's really that simple, unlike wserra who "gets off" on complicating things through his mental masturbation.
And yes, Amway does have some very effective laundry products that can even take stains, like his, out of a pair of his trousers.
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
And after the revival meeting, go up to Elmer Gantry and ask him if he can really heal the sick.GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Now, how can you verify my claims? Simple. Locate a public opportunity meeting put on by some Amway IBO's. There not hard to find, just ask IBO's in your area. When you attend the meeting, ask people where you can find the "Platinum's". When you are introduced to some, ask them, for yourself, if what I'm saying is true.
That's some nice "verification" there, Lou.It's really that simple, unlike wserra who "gets off" on complicating things through his mental masturbation.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Done that. And yes, they claimed that is what they were making. However, later I came to fine out the truth - they weren't making close to that and what they did make that was in that range was from media sales. Come on, how much did you make in the system? How much are you making now? How about your direct upline?GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Now, how can you verify my claims? Simple. Locate a public opportunity meeting put on by some Amway IBO's. There not hard to find, just ask IBO's in your area. When you attend the meeting, ask people where you can find the "Platinum's". When you are introduced to some, ask them, for yourself, if what I'm saying is true.
But back on point, I asked to see his schedule C or his latest quarterly business statements. Nope. Didn't happen. They want to say that they all make the money from PV but they never want to PROVE it.
Hey, I made 2 million dollars last month as a tax lawyer. I guess that means that I've verified my income level. Sweet.It's really that simple, unlike wserra who "gets off" on complicating things through his mental masturbation.
How about some proof legal beagles. Quit acting like you're really that stupid to suggest the company website is actually proof. How about providing the hourly wage breakdown of someone that is Direct (or emerald now)? After all, about 85% of Away Global IBOs never get there anyway. Its a stupid business concept that offers nothing meaningful in life. I guess if all that you're after is to make money off of gullible people - maybe you can get lucky, get into the media sales and make some decent money. You have a better chance of being struck by lightning, but go ahead.
I'll take the rewarding career. Meet me in 20 years and we'll see who came out better.
Last edited by wserra on Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Fix quotes.
Reason: Fix quotes.
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
"Now, how can you verify my claims? Simple. Locate a public opportunity meeting put on by some Amway IBO's. There not hard to find, just ask IBO's in your area. When you attend the meeting, ask people where you can find the "Platinum's". When you are introduced to some, ask them, for yourself, if what I'm saying is true."Imalawman wrote:Hey, I made 2 million dollars last month as a tax lawyer. I guess that means that I've verified my income level. Sweet.
How about some proof legal beagles. Quit acting like you're really that stupid to suggest the company website is actually proof. How about providing the hourly wage breakdown of someone that is Direct (or emerald now)? After all, about 85% of Away Global IBOs never get there anyway. Its a stupid business concept that offers nothing meaningful in life. I guess if all that you're after is to make money off of gullible people - maybe you can get lucky, get into the media sales and make some decent money. You have a better chance of being struck by lightning, but go ahead.
While you were busy beating you chest in between your making 2 million Tarzan it is very clear, crystal clear you neglected to read everything I said...
I'm glad your not doing my taxes buckwheat.
Last edited by GoldandSilverEagles on Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Basileus Quatlooseus
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:19 am
- Location: The Land of Enchantment
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
And of course, these platinum people will tell you honestly and forthrightly how much time they spend, what their gross is, and what their expenses are.
Little boys who tell lies grow up to be weathermen.
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Those are very good points. I'd recommend that you attend a business function and ask them yourself.LaVidaRoja wrote:And of course, these platinum people will tell you honestly and forthrightly how much time they spend, what their gross is, and what their expenses are.
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
hahaha, I have and I've done that too. They're very, very vague and constantly evade the tough questions about their business. When you finally ask a pointed question they clam up and claim its their private information. I have yet to have anyone in the "business" offer me a financial statement. I have even offered to trade - i'll give them my personal 1040 information (ssn and private info redacted of course). But no - no dice. Not even and un-audited financial statement. So, Golden, I've done what you've suggested and gotten nowhere in the past. Anything else? better yet - how about you ask a platinum next time you're around one. See if they'll give you any actual financial information. I'm not even asking for personal tax info - just a business income statement.GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Those are very good points. I'd recommend that you attend a business function and ask them yourself.LaVidaRoja wrote:And of course, these platinum people will tell you honestly and forthrightly how much time they spend, what their gross is, and what their expenses are.
Its a free country and they don't have to give a single bit of information. But then again, I have every right to doubt them when they claim to be making money off selling the product.
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
How do I now for a fact that you're not making your whole "pissing in the wind" story up? Lawyers are notorious for lying. How do I know you're not a liar? How can I verify your story lawyer boy?Imalawman wrote: hahaha, I have and I've done that too. They're very, very vague and constantly evade the tough questions about their business. When you finally ask a pointed question they clam up and claim its their private information. I have yet to have anyone in the "business" offer me a financial statement. I have even offered to trade - i'll give them my personal 1040 information (ssn and private info redacted of course). But no - no dice. Not even and un-audited financial statement. So, Golden, I've done what you've suggested and gotten nowhere in the past.
You've been claiming since day one in here that Amway IBO's misrepresent their business. It;'s a waste of time and energy to further this debate, but I will tell you lawyer boy, your hands aren't as clean as you portray yourself.Anything else? better yet - how about you ask a platinum next time you're around one. See if they'll give you any actual financial information. I'm not even asking for personal tax info - just a business income statement.
Its a free country and they don't have to give a single bit of information. But then again, I have every right to doubt them when they claim to be making money off selling the product.
You have a major element of misrepresentation whenever you are representing your "clients". You'd like your clients to believe that your first point of concern and obligation is to them, and that's pure BS! How upfront are you with your clients in disclosing to them that your FIRST obligation IS NOT to them, your first concern is how much $$$ you can extract/extort out of their pockets! Then your obligated to the courts, b4 you are obligated to your clients.
Talk about a legalized screw job!
Disclosing these to your clients, b4 they contract with you, would be consistent with maintaining full disclosure, and lawyers, as a predator, rarely offer this bit of info to their clients.
Talk about a lack of integrity. Lawyers and integrity, there's an oxymoron!
Lawyers also have a very high incident of alcohol and drug abuse. Do you disclose that to your clients b4 contracting with them? Hell no!
So b4 you start claiming misrepresentation, and lack of integrity, look in the mirror at your own industry first son.
Last edited by GoldandSilverEagles on Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Basileus Quatlooseus
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:19 am
- Location: The Land of Enchantment
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
GASE - I hate to intrude reality into your fantisies, but look at the Tax Court cases involving Amway
Little boys who tell lies grow up to be weathermen.
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
And your point is? .....LaVidaRoja wrote:GASE - I hate to intrude reality into your fantisies, but look at the Tax Court cases involving Amway
BTW, "fantisies" when correctly spelled is spelled f-a-n-t-a-s-i-e-s.
Next time use spell check. lol
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Pot, kettle ...GoldandSilverEagles wrote:Next time use spell check. lol
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: Quixtar v. Monavie
Feel better now?GoldandSilverEagles wrote: You have a major element of misrepresentation whenever you are representing your "clients". You'd like your clients to believe that your first point of concern and obligation is to them, and that's pure BS! How upfront are you with your clients in disclosing to them that your FIRST obligation IS NOT to them, your first concern is how much $$$ you can extract/extort out of their pockets! Then your obligated to the courts, b4 you are obligated to your clients.
Talk about a legalized screw job!
Disclosing these to your clients, b4 they contract with you, would be consistent with maintaining full disclosure, and lawyers, as a predator, rarely offer this bit of info to their clients.
Talk about a lack of integrity. Lawyers and integrity, there's an oxymoron!
Lawyers also have a very high incident of alcohol and drug abuse. Do you disclose that to your clients b4 contracting with them? Hell no!
So b4 you start claiming misrepresentation, and lack of integrity, look in the mirror at your own industry first son.
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown