CaptainKickback wrote:I also recall activists using the courts to get the US Navy (part of the federal government/USA) to have its subs stop using active sonar, as it was possibly upsetting the whales. I think that was a temporary injunction - I could be wrong.
It was recently overturned by the US Supreme Court, whether it was temporary or permanent.
I may be confused but how many injunctions have you, or anyone you know, obtained against the United States of America ?
That gets my vote for non sequitur of the week.
In my opinion there is a major difference that is decisive in each case.
Which you could have made explicit, but did not. One can't help speculating on the reason for that curious omission on your part.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat
Noah wrote:The "differences" are very important. A opinion that the differences are not important reminds me of the statement "...they are exactly the same but only different....."
In my opinion there is a major difference that is decisive in each case.
I may be confused but how many injunctions have you, or anyone you know, obtained against the United States of America ?
Injunctions? Yes, you are confused.
No, the "differences" are not important.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
Noah wrote:As I see it the 16th does not overide [sic] Pollack [sic].
The Supreme Court saw it differently:
“[T]there is no escape from the conclusion that the [16th] Amendment was drawn for the purpose of doing away for the future with the principle upon which the Pollock [sic] Case was decided....”
Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916).
Oh, and you're a g-damn narcissistic illiterate ignorant moron, in case you didn't know already.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Noah wrote:The "differences" are very important. A opinion that the differences are not important reminds me of the statement "...they are exactly the same but only different....."
In my opinion there is a major difference that is decisive in each case.
I may be confused but how many injunctions have you, or anyone you know, obtained against the United States of America ?
Noah wrote:As I see it the 16th does not overide [sic] Pollack [sic].
The Supreme Court saw it differently:
“[T]there is no escape from the conclusion that the [16th] Amendment was drawn for the purpose of doing away for the future with the principle upon which the Pollock [sic] Case was decided....”
Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916).
Oh, and you're a g-damn narcissistic illiterate ignorant moron, in case you didn't know already.
Noah wrote:
It is impossible to get light from a black hole
Thanks to you, we already know that.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
Aww, now we'll never know about those key differences between the 1894 and 1913 tax acts. My money was on semicolon placement.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat
Quixote..
You would lose your money on the semi-colon.. I do agree with your nomination concerning my comment about Injunctions. I also agree with the Court decisions in the Bill Benson cases. My agreement must be based on confusion, right ?
Noah wrote:Quixote..
You would lose your money on the semi-colon.. I do agree with your nomination concerning my comment about Injunctions. I also agree with the Court decisions in the Bill Benson cases. My agreement must be based on confusion, right ?
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!
I do agree with your nomination concerning my comment about Injunctions. I also agree with the Court decisions in the Bill Benson cases. My agreement must be based on confusion, right ?