An interesting article on prison life

A collection of old posts from all forums. No new threads or new posts in old threads allowed. For archive use only.
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

An interesting article on prison life

Post by Demosthenes »

Enter a ‘Hellish Place’

By Luke Mullins
From the May/June 2007 Issue
Filed under: Big Ideas, Culture, Public Square

Tougher rules and longer sentences mean that prison for white-collar inmates is no longer Club Fed. Prisoner No. 20532-050 tells his eyewitness story to Luke Mullins.

I. Just Another Felon

Alfred A. Porro Jr. came to Allenwood in a large transport bus guarded by a handful of armed correc­tions officers. Like the five other prisoners on board, he arrived in full shackles. As the bus rumbled to a stop, the officers escorted the new inmates off the vehicle and turned them over to their keepers.

Porro disembarked with relief. Over the past two days, he had been whisked from one prison to another—no one would tell him where he was headed. Now, at least, Porro knew he would be serv­ing his time at a minimum-security prison camp. Good news, he thought. And the grounds, Porro had to admit, were less than intimidating. With sweeping grasslands and thickets of trees, the camp presented none of the chilling images that the term “prison” calls to mind. No fences, no coiled razor wire, no sharpshooters on towers. It might as well have been a college campus.

‘It’s not Yale, it’s jail,’ says the former corrections officer. ‘We don’t separate a white-collar guy from an organized-crime guy from a bank robber—they’re all the same.’But as he took his first steps onto the prison grounds, Porro became overwhelmed with dread. He was 64 years old, with seven children and 11 grand­children. During the good times, he was a respected lawyer and a business partner to Lawrence Taylor, the famous Giants football star. When he went on trial, the press called him the “Teflon attorney,” who had made “Houdini-like escapes” from previous investigations. At his core, he still considered him­self a man of deep faith. But on that day, November 11, 1999, Al Porro was just another convicted felon disappearing into the federal prison system.

He carried another burden into Allenwood as well. A few days earlier, his wife, Joan, had reported to the minimum-security Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut, to begin a prison sentence of nearly five years. Porro shuddered with guilt at the hardships she now faced. “My wife went to jail because of me,” he said. “You have to know how dev­astated I was to see my wife crying and shackled and to know that it was because of me.”
Should be required reading for TPs.

To read more:

http://www.american.com/archive/2007/ma ... -place2019
.
Pirate Purveyor of the Last Word
Posts: 1698
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 2:06 am

Post by . »

Should be required reading for TPs
Probably bounce right off of them. Just a cost of doing business. Probably more important that their wives read it.
My wife went to jail because of me
Tessa can relate to MulletBoy.
All the States incorporated daughter corporations for transaction of business in the 1960s or so. - Some voice in Van Pelt's head, circa 2006.
Cobalt Shiva
Black Seas Commodore Designate
Posts: 179
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:06 am
Location: Where the Grass is Green and the Girls Are Pretty

Post by Cobalt Shiva »

CaptainKickback wrote:From any Quatloosians that served in the USMC, how bad was the guy's prison life compared to boot camp?
Boot camp was a bit worse than this. And it's gotten a lot tougher now than it was in 1983. (We didn't do the Crucible--54 hours without sleep, working as a member of a team to overcome a variety of very challenging obstacles. The young men and women going through MCRD Parris Island and MCRD San Diego really are America's finest.)
Of course, if you were a rich, high-powered attorney, it would be a real come-down. For an average palooka, not so much.
The guy in the article whining about being told to clean the toilet just broke my f***ing heart.
Disilloosianed

Post by Disilloosianed »

As best I can tell, the guy's biggest hardships were the realization that he was going to have to be with poorer people of other races and that he had to sleep in the top bunk. I can't speak for boot camp, but it strikes me that he was in much better facilities that those described in the recent Walter Reed scandal. He also fared better than most people living in homeless shelters, nearly any state institution health or mental institution, and most housing projects. My heart bleeds for him.
Imalawman
Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
Posts: 1808
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.

Post by Imalawman »

The ONLY sympathetic part of his story was only speaking to his wife twice a year. That would be hard. But otherwise, I can't say it was all that bad sounding. Especially having seen the latest Nat. Geo special on LA's violent prisons.
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Post by Demosthenes »

What I found interesting was how similar this guy's thinking was to a TPs. Even though both he and his wife were experienced and successful lawyers, they went the pro se route, and right up until the moment that his appeal was denied, he just knew in his heart of hearts that he would win and walk out of prison.
Dezcad
Khedive Ismail Quatoosia
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:19 pm

Post by Dezcad »

Demosthenes wrote:What I found interesting was how similar this guy's thinking was to a TPs. Even though both he and his wife were experienced and successful lawyers, they went the pro se route, and right up until the moment that his appeal was denied, he just knew in his heart of hearts that he would win and walk out of prison.
"He had delusions of adequacy." - Walter Kerr
gottago
Victim of Incarcerated Criminal
Posts: 138
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 6:57 am

Post by gottago »

A fascinating read but I do not see the connection between this man and his wife and "tax protesting". The crime discussed that landed them in federal prison did not appear to have anything to do with the convicted saying that they did not believe they were liable for federal income tax or that they took actions to avoid paying federal income tax. The situation described seems a bit more complex in my opinion but of course I am probably wrong.
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

gottago wrote:A fascinating read but I do not see the connection between this man and his wife and "tax protesting". The crime discussed that landed them in federal prison did not appear to have anything to do with the convicted saying that they did not believe they were liable for federal income tax or that they took actions to avoid paying federal income tax. The situation described seems a bit more complex in my opinion but of course I am probably wrong.
"As Porro left for work on a chilly December morning in 1996, just a couple of days before Christmas, four armed agents from the Internal Revenue Service met him at his car. They presented him with a lengthy indictment that included filing false tax returns and fraud. The encounter was not a total shock; a year earlier, a team of shotgun-wielding federal investigators had rifled through Porro’s home and office, searching for incriminat­ing documents."

"The thrust of the government’s case was that Joan Porro, then the executor of a trust that a former cli­ent had set up for his two children, had invested some funds from the trust in one of Al’s business ventures with Lawrence Taylor. Since documents regarding the investment were distributed by the U.S. Postal Service and did not disclose Al Porro’s stake, the Porros had committed mail fraud, the government contended."
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

CaptainKickback wrote:From any Quatloosians that served in the USMC, how bad was the guy's prison life compared to boot camp?

Of course, if you were a rich, high-powered attorney, it would be a real come-down. For an average palooka, not so much.
I went to RTC Great Lakes (in winter) and it was slightly better than that.
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros
LPC
Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
Posts: 5233
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
Location: Earth

Post by LPC »

Doktor Avalanche wrote:"The thrust of the government’s case was that Joan Porro, then the executor of a trust that a former cli­ent had set up for his two children, had invested some funds from the trust in one of Al’s business ventures with Lawrence Taylor. Since documents regarding the investment were distributed by the U.S. Postal Service and did not disclose Al Porro’s stake, the Porros had committed mail fraud, the government contended."
An act of self-dealing by a trustee can be criminal fraud?

Wow! Either the reporter used the word "invested" as a synonym for "embezzled" or "diverted" or there's a lot of criminal fraud going unpunished in the world of trusts.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Doktor Avalanche
Asst Secretary, the Dept of Jesters
Posts: 1767
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:20 pm
Location: Yuba City, CA

Post by Doktor Avalanche »

LPC wrote:
Doktor Avalanche wrote:"The thrust of the government’s case was that Joan Porro, then the executor of a trust that a former cli­ent had set up for his two children, had invested some funds from the trust in one of Al’s business ventures with Lawrence Taylor. Since documents regarding the investment were distributed by the U.S. Postal Service and did not disclose Al Porro’s stake, the Porros had committed mail fraud, the government contended."
An act of self-dealing by a trustee can be criminal fraud?

Wow! Either the reporter used the word "invested" as a synonym for "embezzled" or "diverted" or there's a lot of criminal fraud going unpunished in the world of trusts.
No, I'm not suggesting that it was. I just highlighted that to show what brought the mail fraud charges.

My apologies for the misunderstanding.

On the other hand, Mrs. Porro could have very well embezzled that money.
The laissez-faire argument relies on the same tacit appeal to perfection as does communism. - George Soros