Now, losthorizons user "Hang'Em High" responds:
The only wonder is that Pablo was not suspended sooner, but even that is not that big of a wonder. Obviously Pete has been very busy for the last year preparing for his trial and figuring out how to proceed in its aftermath.
Ooohhhh, now that's a mistake right there, HangMeister! You're implying that the Fabulous Felon, the Blowhard-in-Chief, the PontificatingPrisonBoundPeterMeister, would actually have to engage in a process of "figuring out" anything at
this point. Hah! Don't you remember?
The Big Peter has the tax law nailed! There is
nothing that His Blowhardiness doesn't
already know!
Don't you remember what the Blowhard has already written about his comprehensive and sophisticated research and analysis of the American tax system? Why, here's what he has written! It is without a doubt:
. . . . the most comprehensive and sophisticated research and analysis of the common, Constitutional, statutory and "case" law related to the American tax system in general and the "income" tax in particular ever conducted.
Why would someone like Peter Hendrickson need to "figure anything out" at this point, eh, boy? And don't you remember how Pete has determined that the accuracy of his research has been "confirmed"? Pete tells us:
The accuracy of that research and analysis is then incontrovertibly confirmed by an unending series of real-world, actual events, starting with my series of historic accomplishments as the first American to ever recover Social Security and Medicare "contributions", the first subject of both IRS summonses and IRS/DOJ injunction efforts to defeat each such assault (and not once, but three times), and the first to have forced the tax system into the choice of either watching its gravy-train be derailed by the truth I have revealed or abandoning all pretenses of legitimacy and law and trying to coerce me into undoing the bonds I have placed upon it.
Ohh....... the bonds he has placed upon it!
Look, getting Pete's guilty verdicts overturned is just part of the whole package of things that is relevant to the subject of the income tax. Don't you know that getting those guilty verdicts thrown out should already be covered in Pete's materials? Why, Pete himself has said:
ANYTHING THAT IS RELEVANT TO THE "INCOME" TAX SUBJECT WILL BE FOUND ACCURATELY AND APPROPRIATELY ADDRESSED IN CtC AND/OR ON THIS WEBSITE. ANYTHING NOT FOUND ADDRESSED IN CtC AND/OR ON THE WEBSITE IS NOT RELEVANT TO THE "INCOME" TAX SUBJECT, AND WILL INTERFERE WITH YOUR ACCURATE COMPREHENSION OF THE SUBJECT.
And if you don't believe that Hendrickson doesn't already have the tax law pegged right there in "CtC," just listen to Peter explain it:
CtC has the tax pegged...The only ongoing development needed...is the...accumulation of...authority...and the refinement of our understanding of...the ploys...by the entrenched beneficiaries of the crumbling status-quo...
Wait, what's that, you say, Hang'Em?......
I am glad that Pete has managed to find some time to read through some of the threads and weigh in on them, and hope he will continue to be able to do so on a more frequent basis, but it is not his sole responsibility to keep us all on track. We must do our best to keep each other on track.
In other words, "Oh, please, don't ban me, too, Pete! I'll toe the line for you!"
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
