Dr. Dino - April's Fool??

darling
First Mate
First Mate
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:35 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Dr. Dino - April's Fool??

Post by darling »

wserra wrote:Shazam! (Even though they're not worth it.)
Thank you - you are my new Hero Of The Day.
Paths of the Sea
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:18 pm

Re: Dr. Dino - April's Fool??

Post by Paths of the Sea »

It's Tuesday, April 6, 2010 at about 9:45 PM MT and I can't connect to his websites?

Anybody else having that problem; know what's up?

Sincerely,
Maury Enthusiast!
Paths of the Sea
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:18 pm

Re: Dr. Dino - April's Fool??

Post by Paths of the Sea »

Nevermind, it's working now.

Must have been something on my computer's end! :oops:

Sincerely,
Maury Enthusiast!
Paths of the Sea
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:18 pm

Re: Dr. Dino - April's Fool??

Post by Paths of the Sea »

In an action filed on April 15 and entered on April 16, Dr. Dino asks the Federal District Court to reconsider the dismissal of all his recently filed motions for a "get out of jail free" card.

Among other things, Dr. Dino claims:

> There are applicable exceptions to
> the rule that Federal Rule of Civil
> Procedure #60(b) cannot be used to
> dismiss the criminal case against
> him.

> Claims he is acting "pro se", as
> his own attorney, and should be
> afforded some consideration since
> he cannot be expected to navigate
> the legal system as a trained
> lawyer might.

(Courts do give special considerations to pro se litigants, but as a practical matter it is laughable that Dr. Dino wants us to think he is really acting pro se.)

> Claimed he has learned that his
> prior legal counsel was
> "incompetent, ineffective,
> ignorant, disloyal, and
> deceptive".

(Yeah, right, Dr. Dino didn't have any idea he was hiring a charlatan, NOT!)

We'll see if the Court is able to dispose of Dr. Dino's latest missive to the Court as easily and quickly as it did those five motions filed last month.

Sincerely,
Maury Enthusiast!
Paths of the Sea
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:18 pm

Re: Dr. Dino - April's Fool??

Post by Paths of the Sea »

Not unexpectedly, the Federal District Court has again moved speedily to dispose of Dr. Dino's (aka Kent Hovind) latest motion for reconsideration, as follows:

---------------------------------------------

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing (motion
for reconsideration), it is Ordered this 16th
day of April, 2010, that:

The relief requested is DENIED.

M. Casey Rodgers
United States District Judge

Filed: 16th
Entered: 19th

---------------------------------------------

Sincerely,
Maury Enthusiast!
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: Dr. Dino - April's Fool??

Post by notorial dissent »

My, that was quick, sweet, succinct, and to the point.

And so much for Dino's going to make it all go away.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.