2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
I can't wait to see the Court's decision on the motion. That ought to make some particularly enjoyable reading....
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Khedive Ismail Quatoosia
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:19 pm
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Even better, I'd love to be at the hearing on the two Motions for Contempt this Thursday. It takes a lot more nerve to make those arguments in open court than to just write them down and file them. And of course, the more PH opens his mouth at the Contempt hearing, the more trouble he will be in. No attorney has filed an appearance in this case so PH and Doreen may be on their own.Pottapaug1938 wrote:I can't wait to see the Court's decision on the motion. That ought to make some particularly enjoyable reading....
Can you hear Petey?
PH: Judge Edmunds, you have no jurisdiction, your judgment is void, and most importantly - "I'm not a person" - so just try and hold me in contempt. Just check this out - http://www.losthorizons.com/lawsuit.htm where I authoritatively state that:
"Edmunds’ "order" is purely for the consumption of a gullible public and press."
"Edmunds also played her part in another sleazy IRS pretense by way of this “lawsuit”
"injunction would be outside the power of the court in any event, since to tell anyone what he or she CAN’T say amounts to dictating what must be said, and thus violates a host of core due process elements, as well as the First Amendment.)"
Check out my drawing - I made you say "EEK!", so there!
Date Filed # Docket Text
06/03/2010 64 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Hearing set for 6/10/2010 10:00 AM before District Judge Nancy G Edmunds (CHem) (Entered: 06/03/2010)
06/03/2010 65 NOTICE of hearing on 60 Second MOTION for Contempt. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2010 10:00 AM before District Judge Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem) (Entered: 06/03/2010)
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
I understand that the government is not yet asking for jail time for what appears to be a clear case of civil contempt. But perhaps this latest foolishness by the Fabulous Felon is a nefarious, diabolical attempt to eventually get himself incarcerated in a relatively local area facility (i.e., for the civil contempt) -- to delay his incarceration (for the felony convictions) with the Federal Bureau of Prisons, under the theory that the jail facilities for contempt would be better than the heaven-knows-where-he'll-be-sent facility of the Bureau of Prisons. Maybe he's thinking that at least the "contempt facilities" would be closer to home, too.
On civil contempt, I wonder: To which facility would the Blowhard be most likely to be sent?
On civil contempt, I wonder: To which facility would the Blowhard be most likely to be sent?
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
... and it would be great to get a picture of the expressions on the judge's face as Petey and Dorren say that.Dezcad wrote:Even better, I'd love to be at the hearing on the two Motions for Contempt this Thursday. It takes a lot more nerve to make those arguments in open court than to just write them down and file them. And of course, the more PH opens his mouth at the Contempt hearing, the more trouble he will be in. No attorney has filed an appearance in this case so PH and Doreen may be on their own.Pottapaug1938 wrote:I can't wait to see the Court's decision on the motion. That ought to make some particularly enjoyable reading....
Can you hear Petey?
PH: Judge Edmunds, you have no jurisdiction, your judgment is void, and most importantly - "I'm not a person" - so just try and hold me in contempt. Just check this out - http://www.losthorizons.com/lawsuit.htm where I authoritatively state that:
"Edmunds’ "order" is purely for the consumption of a gullible public and press."
"Edmunds also played her part in another sleazy IRS pretense by way of this “lawsuit”
"injunction would be outside the power of the court in any event, since to tell anyone what he or she CAN’T say amounts to dictating what must be said, and thus violates a host of core due process elements, as well as the First Amendment.)"
Check out my drawing - I made you say "EEK!", so there!
Date Filed # Docket Text
06/03/2010 64 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Hearing set for 6/10/2010 10:00 AM before District Judge Nancy G Edmunds (CHem) (Entered: 06/03/2010)
06/03/2010 65 NOTICE of hearing on 60 Second MOTION for Contempt. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2010 10:00 AM before District Judge Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem) (Entered: 06/03/2010)
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Sometimes I'm sorry they closed Dry Tortugas.....
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
- Location: Earth
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Hendrickson's brief, in summarized form:
Procedural History: I'm being railroaded because you don't want anyone to hear the truth.
Issues Presented:
1. Whether I'm right, or the court is wrong.
2. How many times to have to explain these things before the court gets it?
Summary of Arguments:
1. The court has no jurisdiction.
2. The court has no evidence.
3. The court is wrong about the law.
4. The court is an idiot.
Table of Authorities:
1. Me
2. Me
3. Me
4. And me.
Conclusion:
The court has been lucky so far, because I'm still being patient, and haven't yet brought the full weight of my intellectual and political power to crush the court like a grape.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
-
- J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
- Posts: 1812
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Southern California
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Even though the Government hasn't asked for it, I wouldn't be surprised if the judge skips the coercive fines part and goes straight to incarceration (with service of the criminal sentence delayed until defendants purge themselves of the civil contempt).
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Sneak preview...Dezcad wrote:
Can you hear Petey?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8Fk0cKsx_U
(I couldn't find the Chris Farley version.)
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Delusional sounds like as good an explanation to me as anything else, certainly nothing based in reality. I think I see another contempt citation coming.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Attempting to build an argument on the basis of statements from previous filings that were rejected seems so me to be the height of frivolity.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
-
- Pirate Purveyor of the Last Word
- Posts: 1698
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 2:06 am
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
This.Dr. C wrote:Even though the Government hasn't asked for it, I wouldn't be surprised if the judge skips the coercive fines part and goes straight to incarceration
All the States incorporated daughter corporations for transaction of business in the 1960s or so. - Some voice in Van Pelt's head, circa 2006.
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Well, you know what they say: "If at first you don't succeed, fail, fail, again!!!!"grixit wrote:Attempting to build an argument on the basis of statements from previous filings that were rejected seems so me to be the height of frivolity.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
yeah, I was thinking the same thing. He's already stated that he's not going to comply under oath in his criminal trial. Further, what's another fine at this point? He has tax debt exceeding his assets already. I doubt more fines are going to accomplish anything. Yet, it seems courts are far more patient that you or I would be.Dr. Caligari wrote:Even though the Government hasn't asked for it, I wouldn't be surprised if the judge skips the coercive fines part and goes straight to incarceration (with service of the criminal sentence delayed until defendants purge themselves of the civil contempt).
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
This morning, I decided to go online and find one of Petey's Youtube rants. Now, my computer is in a downstairs room just off the front hallway to my house; and this room is separated from the hallway by French doors, which were closed this morning. As I sit at the computer, my back is to the hallway and the doors.
Imagine my reaction when Petey's handsome (cough, choke) face came onto my computer screen; and the reflection from the French doors, on the screen, made a nice little pattern of what looked like cell door bars on Petey's face.
Is this serendipity, or what?
Imagine my reaction when Petey's handsome (cough, choke) face came onto my computer screen; and the reflection from the French doors, on the screen, made a nice little pattern of what looked like cell door bars on Petey's face.
Is this serendipity, or what?
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Fretful leader of the Quat Quartet
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Usually between the first and twelfth frets
Re: 2d Motion for Contempt against Pete and Doreen Hendrickson
Reminiscient of the final scene in The Maltese Falcon when the elevator gate is pulled across Mary Astor's face (she's taking the fall for Miles Archer's murder).Pottapaug1938 wrote:Imagine my reaction when Petey's handsome (cough, choke) face came onto my computer screen; and the reflection from the French doors, on the screen, made a nice little pattern of what looked like cell door bars on Petey's face.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJXdA6mG-EI (start at the 4:50 mark)
"Run get the pitcher, get the baby some beer." Rev. Gary Davis