There is an article on MLMs today at the Zero Hedge site, calling for regulation of them as pyramid schemes: http://tinyurl.com/ycnk2b6
I thought the diagram and research by a professor I studied with was illuminating. Why not just charge for the product or service and then reinvest the profits back into the business? Then it wouldn't be a multi-level marketing plan....
Regulating MLMs
Moderator: wserra
-
- Hereditary Margrave of Mooloosia
- Posts: 1232
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: Connecticut, "The Constitution State"
Regulating MLMs
'There are two kinds of injustice: the first is found in those who do an injury, the second in those who fail to protect another from injury when they can.' (Roman. Cicero, De Off. I. vii)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
'Choose loss rather than shameful gains.' (Chilon Fr. 10. Diels)
Re: Regulating MLMs
I believe the FTC's so called "biz op rule" has been effectively stopped/ delayed by the DSA (presumably, but I can find no links), MLM attorneys, and certain MLMs. While I can find no recent articles, I did find these:
"MLM attorney Gerald Nehra and the FTC’s proposed Business Opportunity Rule"
http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2 ... nity-rule/
"Another reason for Gerald Nehra to dislike the FTC Business Opportunity Rule: Lots of companies will have to comply!"
http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2 ... to-comply/
"Mary Kay's Opposition to the Biz Op Rule"
http://www.pinktruth.com/index.php?opti ... &Itemid=63
These articles are older than your link, and I can't say for sure exactly what happened, or what may be currently pending. But considering both the political influence and money behind the large MLMs, I doubt anything radical is going to change.
Meanwhile, in the article you cited, I have read all of Reggie Middleton's articles on Pre-Paid Legal Services. The SEC and FTC inquiries are still pending, last time I checked.
"MLM attorney Gerald Nehra and the FTC’s proposed Business Opportunity Rule"
http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2 ... nity-rule/
"Another reason for Gerald Nehra to dislike the FTC Business Opportunity Rule: Lots of companies will have to comply!"
http://www.sequenceinc.com/fraudfiles/2 ... to-comply/
"Mary Kay's Opposition to the Biz Op Rule"
http://www.pinktruth.com/index.php?opti ... &Itemid=63
These articles are older than your link, and I can't say for sure exactly what happened, or what may be currently pending. But considering both the political influence and money behind the large MLMs, I doubt anything radical is going to change.
Meanwhile, in the article you cited, I have read all of Reggie Middleton's articles on Pre-Paid Legal Services. The SEC and FTC inquiries are still pending, last time I checked.
Last edited by Emet on Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7624
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: Regulating MLMs
Yes, that's what happened so far as its application to MLMs. According to the FTC, the initial proposed biz opp rule received "more than 17,000 comments, the overwhelming majority of which came from the multi-level marketing ("MLM'') industry". They then backed off, and the final rule excluded MLMs.Emet wrote:I believe the FTC's so called "biz op rule" has been effectively stopped/ delayed by the DSA (presumably, but I can find no links)
Moral: a small but determined, vocal and well-financed minority can and frequently does prevail over the public interest. It's damn hard to see how disclosure is bad - unless, of course, you're selling a scam and disclosure would hurt sales.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume