From the RAP-NESARA forum.
Cabal running Washington DC private corporation plans
Wednesday, October 06, 2010
Cabal running Washington DC private corporation plans to sacrifice Obama and shoe-in fluffy puppet Hillary Clinton as US President.
Civil War in America now likely. US Federal Reserve Board cannot remain viable beyond January 2011.
In the background is a sharp international problem: What does the planet do with the million-plus US Satanists who have been running America illegally? Nobody wants these vermin and only a few thousand are likely to be butchered in their own internal end-time squabbles.
Some sort of home will have to be found for the fleeing US politicians, lawyers, banksters, religionists, spooks and clone-handlers. It would be wiser to offer them a managed island refuge somewhere than to force them to die in a damaging final firefight. They can only reasonably be held in their own Halliburton-constructed FEMA concentration camps and Gunderson Steel AutoMax prison cars for a few months. More about the élite Alpha Lodge Skull & Bones Satanism which controls Washington DC here. And more about the hidden antecedents of the "individual" called Hillary Clinton here.
Posted by John MacHaffie at 3:06 AM 0 comments
OK, a pretty normal bit of raving for Mr. MacHaffie, with the original loaded with links. The last of these is from the "... Hillary Clinton here" text and links to http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/200 ... inton.html Long-time readers may remember my mocking the various NESARA-related conspiracy theories by comparing them to the "Paul is dead" Beatles conspiracy theory of late 1969. Deep Knight was taking a creative writing class in high school at the time, and decided to do a writing project by riding the bus for a week, writing down things people said, and making something cohesive from these non-sequitors. However, that Monday was when the "Paul is dead" thing hit local radio, and this was the topic of conversation all week. This changed my writing project to one that followed the genesis of conspiracy theories, a subject I've been interested in ever since. Imagine my surprise when it showed up from this link as "proof" of cloning.
Sunday, January 06, 2008
The Bilocation of Hillary Clone-Clinton
http://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/200 ... inton.html
Alcuin Bramerton Twitter
Page update: 28.06.10
In 2008, during the American presidential election campaign, US Senator Hillary Clinton's handlers began to get clumsy and she was seen in two different places at once on a number of separate occasions. And not just in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Someone sees Hillary Clinton at a function across town at, say, 1.30pm. And then, when they compare notes with a Democratic Party co-worker later that day, they learn that Hillary was also seen back at the hotel at 1.30pm, three miles away. And her clothes were different, or her hair was different, or her makeup was different, and the people with her were different. Or, after a speaking engagement, the car drives Hillary Clinton away to Location A, where she is seen to get out of the car at, say, 10.45pm. But a co-worker sees her at 11.00pm at Location B thirty or forty miles away, except that Hillary Clinton and the car have not left Location A. And they couldn't drive that fast anyway, and Hillary's clothing or appearance is different, and the people with her are different. And the next day, arriving for an early morning meeting somewhere, Hillary comes from Location B, not from Location A. Meanwhile, she is seen having a late breakfast at Location A with different people. And so on.
How many different Hillary Clintons are there?
It is suggested that over half the US Presidential hopefuls in 2008 were human clones. There were several of each of them. Was Hillary Clinton one of these or several of them? And how are the voters to discriminate?
...
More information about the use of human clones in American political management can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
But it is not just politicians, military people, finance professionals and religious leaders who have been cloned. Human clones are found in the show business world, too. And they feature prominently in the mainstream media's presentation of celebrity culture. Consider the much-discussed case of the two Paul McCartneys. Four other Paul McCartney photographic comparisons can be viewed here, here, here and here. Look at McCartney's left ear lobe here (in 1964) and here (in 1964), compared with his left ear lobe here (in 1974) and here (in 1974). The murder and cloning of Beatle Paul McCartney by agents acting for the Tavistock Institute (London) in 1966 is a story which has been revisited again recently. It is sometimes referred to as The Two McCartneys Conundrum.
For many decades people have taken the view that the original pop star Paul McCartney of the Beatles, a Tavistock Institute band, is dead. He died in a car accident in 1966 which was reported by several media outlets before being hushed up. The car accident, like Princess Diana's thirty years later, was an arranged murder or cover for an arranged murder.
After 1966 it was widely noted that Paul McCartney had changed. He was considerably taller, and his physiognomy, voice and mannerisms were different. And evidence is emerging which suggests that the Beatles didn't even write some of the music accredited to them after that date.
On this view, the Beatles were planned by the shadow controllers of the sixties music industry. The purpose of the Beatles was social engineering. The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the old social system. It was a carefully crafted plot to introduce, by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive element into a large worldwide population group targeted for change against its will.
New words and new phrases prepared by the Tavistock Institute mind-moulders were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of illicit drugs. The subtext beneath this vocabulary arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went. It had only to be "discovered" by teenagers.
The word "teenager" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
It was important at that time for the Shadow Government (controlling the USA from Europe) to affirm illicit drug use in the youth culture. This would enrich the drug barons worldwide who paid for the private armies and bribes necessary to maintain hidden power. And now, in 2009, the USA is in Afghanistan to protect the illicit drugs trade. And now, in 2009, most major US banks have only been able to stay afloat by bringing illicit drugs money on to their books by using counterfeit source of funds documentation.
One persistent idea is that in September 1966, Paul McCartney was replaced with a double called William Shepherd or William Campbell. McCartney was terminated and replaced because he refused to go along with the pro-drug agenda of the Beatles' Tavistock controllers.
After 1966, the new Paul McCartney started doing frank interviews about his LSD habit. McCartney's murder not only eliminated someone who wouldn't go with the program, it served as a warning to others in the circle not step out of the Tavistock line.
It is more likely, however, that Paul McCartney was cloned before being terminated, samples of his originator DNA having been obtained, cultured and amplified before his accident. Human clones, such as the Bushes, the Clintons and the Obamas, are not ensouled. They have no souls - no innate communication with positive influences among the Higher Evolution in the higher dimensions. They are intelligent, mind-controlled meat-machines, programmed by those whose negative agenda they implement. Might Paul McCartney be the same? Clones are not aware that they are clones. Such information is not permitted to occur to them or to enter their mind-programming.
This is the third time I've seen the word "teenager" linked to the appearance of the Beatles by some rock 'n roll conspiracy theorist. According to Answers.com ( http://www.answers.com/topic/teenager ) the word "teenage" first appeared in the 1920's and "teenager" specifically is found in a 1941 Reader's Digest. As you know, 1941 was "just before the Beatles arrived on the scene" in 1964 (well, at least in the USA, I suppose you could use 1962 or 1963 for the UK).