Moderators!!!!
this is a request to remove someone who has gone back to inciting dissension and attacking members who are searching for proper procedures to handle illegal IRS activities.
He went away for awhile, I thought after he had realized by the responses to his attacks, that his input was causing more harm than benefit, but apparently he has returned.
Please remove skankbeat from posting on this forum. I am of the opinion he is a troll.. causing more harm than good.
Skankbeat is back.
-
- Quatloosian Master of Deception
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: Sanhoudalistan
Skankbeat is back.
And after only two days, oldhawaiiscot is calling for him to be banned.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Tax protesters.... When they're paranoid (which is most of the time), they're soooo cute!Quixote wrote:And after only two days, oldhawaiiscot is calling for him to be banned.Moderators!!!!
this is a request to remove someone who has gone back to inciting dissension and attacking members who are searching for proper procedures to handle illegal IRS activities.
He went away for awhile, I thought after he had realized by the responses to his attacks, that his input was causing more harm than benefit, but apparently he has returned.
Please remove skankbeat from posting on this forum. I am of the opinion he is a troll.. causing more harm than good.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: Skankbeat is back.
OH NO!!! Not dissenting opinions!!! Shock! Horror! Gasp!Quixote wrote:And after only two days, oldhawaiiscot is calling for him to be banned.Moderators!!!!
this is a request to remove someone who has gone back to inciting dissension and attacking members who are searching for proper procedures to handle illegal IRS activities.
He went away for awhile, I thought after he had realized by the responses to his attacks, that his input was causing more harm than benefit, but apparently he has returned.
Please remove skankbeat from posting on this forum. I am of the opinion he is a troll.. causing more harm than good.
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Skankbeat is back.
I found this little gem from SkankBeat, posted yesterday (May 19):
I am reminded of this scene from Animal House:
Common law is used everywhere, you just were not taught about it in the government schools. The US Constitution IS common law.
http://www.losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewt ... d0b6#27808In the 1984-ish rewrite of history, it [the U.S. Constitution? or the common law?] has been relabeled "constitution law", to make the common law invisible....
I am reminded of this scene from Animal House:
--from Animal House (1978), screenplay by Harold Ramis, Douglas Kenney and Chris Miller; directed by John Landis.Bluto: What? Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!
Otter: [to Boon] Germans?
Boon: Forget it, he's rolling.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Ah, yes, the great mental prowess and font of legal insight that is dear old Skanky. At the very least he is comic relief in a room full of clowns.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Quatloosian Federal Witness
- Posts: 7580
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Skank really outdid himself with this one:
And man, will you need it.I got all my property back from the state today. Those who have been following my threads, for 2010 i used common law remedy to supplement a CTC-educated return. How i did this is loosely documented in my threads. It took a little more than one month to receive check.
In a nutshell, i used a common law notice to characterize the 1040 and 4852 as a common law notice and demand for return of property. This steps 100% outside the jurisdiction of USC 26. The common law wraps itself around the 1040 and controls it. The 1040 acting as a common law notice and demand supercedes its usual purpose under USC 26 although it does not hinder such purpose. Wherever there is conflict, the common law notice and demand preempts. The USC 26 presumption traps are destroyed.
Although the state "gets it", the IRS is not being as compliant. In a recent letter from the "Rejects Team", officers make claim that i did not supply enough information about "wages". They are basically processing the 1040 disregarding that common law is controlling it, not USC 26. They are assuming contract exists. IRS officers have the duty to know the law and know how to handle a common law notice and demand. Issue will be escalated to the US Secretray of Treasury under common law.
If you attempt such remedy you must understand common law so you can "think the law" to overcome obstacles. You must be able and prepared to invoke court in common law. This is not a template solution. Do not hope to fake things and get results. It took me over 12 months to get up to speed with the common law and get past all the disinformation out there. Good luck.
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
- David Hume
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Yes, "loosely documented" would be a good way of putting it.SkankBeat wrote:I got all my property back from the state today. Those who have been following my threads, for 2010 i used common law remedy to supplement a CTC-educated return. How i did this is loosely documented in my threads......
"In a nutshell" would be a good way to describe SkankBeat's location -- his mental location. SkankBeat: A nut in his nutshell......In a nutshell, i used a common law notice to characterize the 1040 and 4852 as a common law notice and demand for return of property.
This steps 100% outside the realm of coherent thought.This steps 100% outside the jurisdiction of USC 26.
Much like a flour tortilla wraps itself around chicken fajita meat.....The common law wraps itself around the 1040 and controls it.
In my wild imagination, my Japanese automobile, acting much like a supersonic jet fighter plane, "supercedes its usual purpose" and flies past other vehicles without "hindering its purpose," as I navigate the traffic on Houston's highways and streets on my way home every afternoon, in a sort of make-believe daydream adventure not unlike one of those fast-action space battle scenes in the Star Wars movies.The 1040 acting as a common law notice and demand supercedes its usual purpose under USC 26 although it does not hinder such purpose....
Where there is federal income tax law, SkankBeat will ignore it and instead compose nonsensical commentary, and will post that commentary at lost horizons dot com. We are so lucky!Wherever there is conflict, the common law notice and demand preempts. The USC 26 presumption traps are destroyed.
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3756
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: Skankbeat is back.
What exactly was "all his property"? Did the IRS/Prosecution/LE subpoena his desktop and records and now they've handed them back? I somehow doubt they have returned his confiscated ranches, private jets and yachts.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: Skankbeat is back.
It's time, once again, for a link to the best article I've seen about the way that Skanky and the others worship the CommonLaw:
www.spunk.org/texts/writers/black/sp001650.html
www.spunk.org/texts/writers/black/sp001650.html
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Warder of the Quatloosian Gibbet
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:43 pm
Re: Skankbeat is back.
You are a fan?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_BlackPottapaug1938 wrote:It's time, once again, for a link to the best article I've seen about the way that Skanky and the others worship the CommonLaw:
http://www.spunk.org/texts/writers/black/sp001650.html
I think I still have a copy of Abolition of Work if you are interested. My interest waned around my sophomore year of college. Right on time.
For some reason it is especially hilarious (to me) to hear him endorsed on Quatloos.
-
- Further Moderator
- Posts: 7521
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 11:48 pm
- Location: Virgin Islands Gunsmith
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Ok, so now we know where skankbeat lives: River City, Iowa.If you attempt such remedy you must understand common law so you can "think the law" to overcome obstacles
"I could be dead wrong on this" - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
"Do you realize I may even be delusional with respect to my income tax beliefs? " - Irwin Schiff
-
- Infidel Enslaver
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:57 pm
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Only because they think he wrote Black's Law Dictionary .....
- - - - - - - - - - -
"The real George Washington was shot dead fairly early in the Revolution." ~ David Merrill, 9-17-2004 --- "This is where I belong" ~ Heidi Guedel, 7-1-2006 (referring to suijuris.net)
- - - - - - - - - - -
"The real George Washington was shot dead fairly early in the Revolution." ~ David Merrill, 9-17-2004 --- "This is where I belong" ~ Heidi Guedel, 7-1-2006 (referring to suijuris.net)
- - - - - - - - - - -
-
- Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
- Posts: 6120
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
- Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.
Re: Skankbeat is back.
I'm not at all a fan of the main body of Black's work; but in the case of this article he has the consitutionalist ghost dancers dead to rights.Lambkin wrote:You are a fan?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_BlackPottapaug1938 wrote:It's time, once again, for a link to the best article I've seen about the way that Skanky and the others worship the CommonLaw:
http://www.spunk.org/texts/writers/black/sp001650.html
I think I still have a copy of Abolition of Work if you are interested. My interest waned around my sophomore year of college. Right on time.
For some reason it is especially hilarious (to me) to hear him endorsed on Quatloos.
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
-
- Quatloosian Master of Deception
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: Sanhoudalistan
Re: Skankbeat is back.
"All his property" was his withheld state income tax. The IRS is still trying to make sense of his return.ArthurWankspittle wrote:What exactly was "all his property"? Did the IRS/Prosecution/LE subpoena his desktop and records and now they've handed them back? I somehow doubt they have returned his confiscated ranches, private jets and yachts.
Skanky manages to hold two diametrically opposed ideas in his head at the same time. He thinks his year of study has revealed to him little known secrets of the common law. At the same time he believes that those secrets are known to every rank and file employee in the IRS. And at right angles to both those ideas is Skanky's certain knowledge that no one has ever heard of a "common law notice and demand" before now because he just made it up.Although the state "gets it", the IRS is not being as compliant. In a recent letter from the "Rejects Team", officers make claim that i did not supply enough information about "wages". They are basically processing the 1040 disregarding that common law is controlling it, not USC 26. They are assuming contract exists. IRS officers have the duty to know the law and know how to handle a common law notice and demand. Issue will be escalated to the US Secretray of Treasury under common law.
I also can't help noticing that Skanky did not say that he would be escalating the issue to the Secretray of the Treasury under common law.
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3756
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Is there some reason for this by the state board? Presumably, until his case with the IRS is settled, no on can agree on what he has earned and therefore what, if anything, he owes the state.Quixote wrote:"All his property" was his withheld state income tax. The IRS is still trying to make sense of his return.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Or, as is equally likely, and probably more likely, some clerk at the state revenue office didn't read what he sent in and he got an erroneous state refund to go with his federal one, and they will eventually be wanting it back as well.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Trusted Keeper of the All True FAQ
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2003 3:38 am
- Location: Earth
Re: Skankbeat is back.
The state employees who approved skankbeat's refund had the same level of understanding of what they were doing that the IRS employees had when the approved millions of dollars of refunds to filers with addresses in the federal prison system.ArthurWankspittle wrote:Is there some reason for this by the state board? Presumably, until his case with the IRS is settled, no on can agree on what he has earned and therefore what, if anything, he owes the state.Quixote wrote:"All his property" was his withheld state income tax. The IRS is still trying to make sense of his return.
They are working in systems based on rote processing and pattern matching. If you submit the right forms, you can get a tax refund for Osama bin Ladin.
It really is that mindless.
Dan Evans
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
Foreman of the Unified Citizens' Grand Jury for Pennsylvania
(And author of the Tax Protester FAQ: evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html)
"Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Skankbeat is back.
SkankBeat has a problem. Over at losthorizons dot com, he writes (emphasis added):
But wait! There's more!
Ah, the SkankMeister is just too sophisticated to fall for the evil government's tricks! He'll show 'em!
Oh, SkankMeister, we bow before your omnipotence!I do not have much time today but here is an important update.
I received an IRS letter CP12 informing me of [a tax] refund and that a check will be sent in 4-6 weeks. This acknowledgement by the IRS that they do not have lawful claim over my property vindicates these theories about private contract nexus and common law remedy......
But wait! There's more!
Ohhhh, how nefarious of the evil, diabolical government banksters! Whatever will SkankBeat do????Having said that, government officers and coaching attorneys are trying to set up another legal trap to get me to invoke USC 26 remedy. They are characterizing my common law notice and demand as a USC 26 [Form] 1040 and see if i will consent to this. This will create evidence that i contracted into USC 26. The refund amount is about one-third less than the amount demanded. This creates a Catch-22. If i dispute the amount then i am invoking USC 26 remedy. If i deposit the check, i create evidence that i consented to the USC 26 process. Gotcha again! If i do nothing, presumption is created that i consented to USC 26 process. It states in bold "If you agree with the changes we made... You should receive a refund for $x.xx in 4-6 weeks..."
http://www.losthorizons.com/phpBB/viewt ... 32b0#28022But i will not consent to such contract. I will not be depositing this check. I will only accept an unconditional payment from the US Treasury acknowledging my common law notice and demand.
Ah, the SkankMeister is just too sophisticated to fall for the evil government's tricks! He'll show 'em!
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Judge for the District of Quatloosia
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 6:04 pm
- Location: West of the Pecos
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Yes, he's got 'em right where he wants 'em.Famspear wrote:...skankidiot wrote: But i will not consent to such contract. I will not be depositing this check. I will only accept an unconditional payment from the US Treasury acknowledging my common law notice and demand.
The Honorable Judge Roy Bean
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
The world is a car and you're a crash-test dummy.
The Devil Makes Three
-
- Enchanted Consultant of the Red Stapler
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Formerly in a cubicle by the window where I could see the squirrels, and they were married.
Re: Skankbeat is back.
Famspear wrote:SkankBeat has a problem. Over at losthorizons dot com, he writes (emphasis added):
But wait! There's more!
Having said that, government officers and coaching attorneys are trying to set up another legal trap to get me to invoke USC 26 remedy. They are characterizing my common law notice and demand as a USC 26 [Form] 1040 and see if i will consent to this. This will create evidence that i contracted into USC 26. The refund amount is about one-third less than the amount demanded. This creates a Catch-22. If i dispute the amount then i am invoking USC 26 remedy. If i deposit the check, i create evidence that i consented to the USC 26 process. Gotcha again! If i do nothing, presumption is created that i consented to USC 26 process. It states in bold "If you agree with the changes we made... You should receive a refund for $x.xx in 4-6 weeks..."
Huh? "coaching attorneys"? So...how did he demand a refund? Did he just sent in a letter asking for it?
So, the best I can make out is that that Skanky is actually entitled to a refund because he doesn't make hardly anything, but he's not entitled to everything back. When they sent the corrected return, he's now freaking out that it's a trap when really, it's a little more than an automated response. Dumbass.
"Some people are like Slinkies ... not really good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down the stairs" - Unknown