New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Moderators: Prof, Judge Roy Bean

fortinbras
Princeps Wooloosia
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by fortinbras »

A thousand blessings upon you!!
Demosthenes
Grand Exalted Keeper of Esoterica
Posts: 5773
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 3:11 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Demosthenes »

I have a hellish deadline at the end of the month, and will put it together after that.
Demo.
Arthur Rubin
Tupa-O-Quatloosia
Posts: 1756
Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 11:02 pm
Location: Brea, CA

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Arthur Rubin »

Demosthenes wrote:I have a hellish deadline at the end of the month, and will put it together after that.
Does this deadline, perhaps, have something to do with a book? :lol:
Arthur Rubin, unemployed tax preparer and aerospace engineer
ImageJoin the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!

Butterflies are free. T-shirts are $19.95 $24.95 $29.95
fortinbras
Princeps Wooloosia
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by fortinbras »

With reference to the Canadian decision of Meads v. Meads ....

A lengthy extract was posted in an Australian lawyer website:
http://mikiverselaw.blogspot.com/

The decision itself has 736 numbered paragraphs, which are probably the best way to pin cites, and Daniel Evan's Tax Protester FAQ is mentioned in ¶ 654 and Quatloos is mentioned in ¶ 655.
Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8246
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Burnaby49 »

fortinbras wrote:With reference to the Canadian decision of Meads v. Meads ....

A lengthy extract was posted in an Australian lawyer website:
http://mikiverselaw.blogspot.com/

The decision itself has 736 numbered paragraphs, which are probably the best way to pin cites, and Daniel Evan's Tax Protester FAQ is mentioned in ¶ 654 and Quatloos is mentioned in ¶ 655.
And don't forget that Russell Porisky, my favorite Canadian tax scammer, is mentioned in paragraph 668(5);

5. How are these advisors different from the OPCA gurus who have been
unsuccessful and found themselves in jail? What did Porisky, Warman, and
Lindsay do wrong?


The judge also brings out the very relevant point that litigants in Canada don't get the free ride they get in the US where anyone can abuse the court system at no cost. To quote;

[665] I suggest you familiarize yourself with the concept of court cost awards. This Court has the authority to make these orders under Rules 10.28-10.33. These are amounts that a court may require an unsuccessful party pay the other litigants. Court costs have a variety of purposes, but generally are intended to offset the fiscal effect of a person being forced to appear in court without a valid legal reason. Rule 10.33 includes important factors that affect costs, as do the litigants’ duties and responsibilities that are listed in Rule 1.2: Paniccia Estate v. Toal, 2012 ABQB 11, at para. 115; Paniccia Estate v. Toal, 2012 ABQB 367 at para. 38. The ‘default’ scale of court costs varies with the amount in dispute: Rules, Schedule C.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs
fortinbras
Princeps Wooloosia
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by fortinbras »

Another copy of the pdf file of the Meads v. Meads decision is found at:

http://www2.albertacourts.ab.ca/jdb/200 ... 571ed1.pdf

Lovely decision. Covers lots of stuff. A Canadian equivalent (but much better organized) than my compilation.
fortinbras
Princeps Wooloosia
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by fortinbras »

On this Thanksgiving Day, I am thankful for my friends (and critics) at Quatloos.

Your wit, companionship, and attention will do much to enable me to go on in the month remaining before the Mayan Doomsday.

//Bernard
fortinbras
Princeps Wooloosia
Posts: 3144
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by fortinbras »

In a decision issued a month ago by the Illinois Court of Appeals .....

http://www.state.il.us/court/R23_Orders ... 66_R23.pdf

... Do you see anything interesting? (BIG HINT: concurring opinion, page 9, paragraph ¶ 27, last sentence).

Just couldn't keep it to myself.
JamesVincent
A Councilor of the Kabosh
Posts: 3096
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:01 am
Location: Wherever my truck goes.

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by JamesVincent »

fortinbras wrote:In a decision issued a month ago by the Illinois Court of Appeals .....

http://www.state.il.us/court/R23_Orders ... 66_R23.pdf

... Do you see anything interesting? (BIG HINT: concurring opinion, page 9, paragraph ¶ 27, last sentence).

Just couldn't keep it to myself.
Congratz, that mean you're big time now?
Disciple of the cross and champion in suffering
Immerse yourself into the kingdom of redemption
Pardon your mind through the chains of the divine
Make way, the shepherd of fire

Avenged Sevenfold "Shepherd of Fire"
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by notorial dissent »

My congratulations as well.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6138
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

... and mine!
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
User avatar
wserra
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Quatloosian Federal Witness
Posts: 7624
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 6:39 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by wserra »

fortinbras wrote:Just couldn't keep it to myself.
So now a macher you are?
"A wise man proportions belief to the evidence."
- David Hume
User avatar
Pottapaug1938
Supreme Prophet (Junior Division)
Posts: 6138
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:26 pm
Location: In the woods, with a Hudson Bay axe in my hands.

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Pottapaug1938 »

A gantzer macher, perhaps?
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." -- Pastor Ray Mummert, Dover, PA, during an attempt to introduce creationism -- er, "intelligent design", into the Dover Public Schools
notorial dissent
A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
Posts: 13806
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by notorial dissent »

So when is the revised edition going to be available?
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
Cathulhu
Order of the Quatloos, Brevet First Class
Posts: 1258
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 3:51 pm

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Cathulhu »

Adding my own congrats. You be rockin'!
Goodness is about what you do. Not what you pray to. T. Pratchett
Always be a moving target. L.M. Bujold
Dr. Caligari
J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Dr. Caligari »

Cathulhu wrote:Adding my own congrats. You be rockin'!
+1!
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
Lowlander

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Lowlander »

To repeat and memorialize the conversation we had FTF last evening, congratulations!
iwethey

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by iwethey »

Felicitations!
Dr. Caligari
J.D., Miskatonic University School of Crickets
Posts: 1812
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Dr. Caligari »

Welcome to Quatloosia, iwethey.
Dr. Caligari
(Du musst Caligari werden!)
Burnaby49
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Quatloosian Ambassador to the CaliCanadians
Posts: 8246
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:45 am
Location: The Evergreen Playground

Re: New edition of "Idiot Legal Arguments"

Post by Burnaby49 »

Dr. Caligari wrote:Welcome to Quatloosia, iwethey.
Looks like we've got a second Canadian contributor. The illustrious gentleman pictured in iwethey's avatar is John A. Macdonald, the first Canadian Prime Minister. Like my grandfather born in Glasgow. John A. ran Canada through an alcoholic haze from 1867 to 1873 then back for a second round in 1878 to 1891.
"Yes Burnaby49, I do in fact believe all process servers are peace officers. I've good reason to believe so." Robert Menard in his May 28, 2015 video "Process Servers".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeI-J2PhdGs