Exactly, at some point they made the conscious and determined decision to "double down on stupid", but more to the point, they will never ever be satisfied with any answer that does not confirm their sincerely held delusion. The others, well, they just started out that way, and are following their natural proclivities towards destruction.Pottapaug1938 wrote:.... the people who, ... double down on stupid...
.... these people will never be satisfied ...
Another "Snow" Job
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: Another "Snow" Job
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Knight Templar of the Sacred Tax
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 12:59 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Another "Snow" Job
"My greatest fear is that the audience will beat me to the punch line." -- David Mamet
-
- Conde de Quatloo
- Posts: 5631
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:08 am
- Location: Der Dachshundbünker
Re: Another "Snow" Job
Red ink or crayon is okay, but (I am not making this up) it must be at a 45 degree angle, top left to bottom right...Famspear wrote:
EDIT: Is it supposed to be written in red ink?
Or is it red crayon?
I can't keep track of all the idiocy.
Supreme Commander of The Imperial Illuminati Air Force
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
Your concern is duly noted, filed, folded, stamped, sealed with wax and affixed with a thumbprint in red ink, forgotten, recalled, considered, reconsidered, appealed, denied and quietly ignored.
-
- A Balthazar of Quatloosian Truth
- Posts: 13806
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 7:17 pm
Re: Another "Snow" Job
I know it is part of the magic incantation, but has anyone ever explained why red, and why at a 45 degree angle, top left to bottom right? I never have gotten that part.
Silly I know, when all the rest is nonsense, but it has to come from somewhere.
Silly I know, when all the rest is nonsense, but it has to come from somewhere.
The fact that you sincerely and wholeheartedly believe that the “Law of Gravity” is unconstitutional and a violation of your sovereign rights, does not absolve you of adherence to it.
-
- Quatloosian Master of Deception
- Posts: 1542
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 2:00 am
- Location: Sanhoudalistan
Re: Another "Snow" Job
I suspect it is done in mimicry of anti-tampering techniques used by courts and bureacracies for centuries.
See for example IRM 11.3.6.4.1
See for example IRM 11.3.6.4.1
Emphasis added11.3.6.4.1 (04-30-2009)
Routine or Non-"Blue Ribbon" Certifications
1.For documents where "blue ribbon " certification is not requested, the Form 2866 is prepared as follows.
2.Immediately after the phrase "I certify that the annexed:" insert a statement similar to the following:
•Is the original. . . or
•Is a true copy of. . . or
•Is an exact transcript of. . . or
•Is an exact transcript of an electronically filed return (without signature document)
...
6.Any attachments should be similarly identified. The identification should end with the phrase ". . . consisting of . . . pages."
7.There should be no punctuation after the last word of the identification (usually "pages" ). Instead, a line should be drawn from the last word to the right margin (generally about one inch from the edge of the paper) and then diagonally to a point just above the first "u" in the phrase "under the custody of this office."
...
"Here is a fundamental question to ask yourself- what is the goal of the income tax scam? I think it is a means to extract wealth from the masses and give it to a parasite class." Skankbeat
-
- Recycler of Paytriot Fantasies
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 6:02 am
Re: Another "Snow" Job
The oldest and simplest is indenture. Write the same text twice on a large page, everyone signs both. Then separate it with a jagged cut. Later, each party can confirm by proving the pieces fit.
Three cheers for the Lesser Evil!
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4
10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
. . . . . . Dr Pepper
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 4