The Constitution Ranger Handbook!

Post by **Demosthenes** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:39 pm

For your reading enjoyment...

http://www.us-constitutionranger.info/r ... chure.html

Post by **Famspear** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:49 pm

Hot dawwwwwggg!

When will Ed be sending out my Constitutional Ranger secret decoder ring and official beanie?

No_Name1 · Post by **No_Name1** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:02 pm

When will Ed be sending out my Constitutional Ranger secret decoder ring and official beanie?

Truly, it's the beanie that makes the uniform.

Cpt Banjo · Post by **Cpt Banjo** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:09 pm

Personally, I'd rather read The Junior Woodchucks Guidebook.

Nikki · Post by **Nikki** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:35 pm

For another viewpoint on the Rangers and their ilk, see http://www.adl.org/mwd/trafstop.asp

Post by **jkeeb** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:36 pm

These are just the guys to send to Ed's fortress. Ed and his groupies would be no match.

Disilloosianed · Post by **Disilloosianed** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:53 pm

I apologize now for my state having produced Pappy Robertson...And people wonder why everyone things there's nothing here by chicken and hillbillies.

Evil Squirrel Overlord · Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:50 pm

Promote a proper understanding that gold and silver are the only lawful money.

Let me guess, they use unlawful paper script, copper-nickel clad, zinc, checks and plastic monies all the time?

I will gladly accept a gold $20 Double Eagle from them for their $20 purchases.

Post by **Quixote** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:47 pm

Establishment of the principle that the conscious taking of a human life is under no circumstances justifiable ...

So Ed is planning on only winging anyone who tries to take him into custody?

Post by **LPC** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:42 pm

I know I'm trying to be logical about this, and it won't work, but I find it exceedingly strange that:

1. This handbook has the name of "Edward-Lewis: Brown" in it (which I presume to be our own favorite fugitive); and

2. According the handbook (p.6), the "territorial jurisdiction" of the "Constitution Rangers" includes the area in North America "specific to the United States of America which includes the 48 states" etc.

But hasn't Ed claimed that the US has no jurisdiction over him? How can the Constitution Rangers have jurisdiction to enforce the US Constitution in New Hampshire while the federal government has no power to enforce the Constitution?

Very strange.

Post by **Quixote** » Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:17 pm

How can the Constitution Rangers have jurisdiction to enforce the US Constitution in New Hampshire while the federal government has no power to enforce the Constitution?

As the handbook explains, the current Constitution Rangers organization was created by resurrecting the United States Constitution Rangers of the 1777 Continental Congress. Since they were protecting the US constitution before it was a twinkle in the Founding Fathers' eyes, it stands to reason that their jurisdiction would not be limited by the US constitution, a Johnny come lately, jurisdictionwise.