During Alex's sadly short stay on Quatloos he dismissed my past criticism of his “PAPERWORK” by which he refuted the criminal allegations against him and dismissed the jurisdictions of the courts, police, state, all that. Alex said that was just “opinion”, and had no facts.
Back then and on Facebook Alex has promised better PAPERWORK and has, prior to being returned to psychiatric examination, published a mighty thing, entitled “113 Page 1647 Clarification Letter” on Scribd (
http://www.scribd.com/doc/202228264/113 ... ion-Letter). The “1647” is the number of questions in this document. (But in fact there are 1646 - but who's to quibble?)
Alex on Facebook instructs “Share this with as much people as possible.” and describes this as “The paperwork used for court.”
I’m comfortable drawing a conclusion – Alex has now moved past being a passive consumer of other people’s stuff to making his own, unique contributions to the world of OPCA thought and materials. Now, that’s not to say this is
better PAPERWORK, or perhaps
effective PAPERWORK, but it is, at a minimum,
different.
I have not scrutinized it in exacting detail, but I thought I would highlight a few items for the reader’s interest which emerged after a cursory review.
Every page has the same massive header:
This is on and for the RECORD. Notice to AGENT is notice to PRINCIPLE. Notice to PRINCIPLE is notice to AGENT PAGE [x] of 113
AFFIDAVIT NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS OR CROWN REPESENTATIVIES of: RIGINA, HER MAJESTY, HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF CANADA, HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE CROWN CORPORATION and CANADA or PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA as per listed on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at
http://sec.gov/ and any other moving or alleged injured party. ON AND FOR THE RECORD we are NOT LEGAL FICTIONS, SURETY for LEGAL FICTIONS, CORPORATIONS, PERSONS, the ACCUSED, a RESIDENCE, a CITIZEN , a private BAR (British Accredited Registrar) guild member or under contract with the BAR , members BRITISH COLUMBIA LAW SOCIETY, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES or PUBLIC SERVANTS under contract for the mentioned CORPORATIONS whatsoever. Please respond within 7 days from proof of service under the penalty of perjury and full commercial liability to these 1646 questions for clarification and full disclosure. Failure to reply under the penalty of perjury and full commercial liability means the moving parties have no claim whatsoever and have agreed to the terms and conditions and fee schedule herein. Send your response by registered mail under the penalty of perjury and full commercial liability to 313 -2416 Main Street, Vancouver, British Columbia. Thank you for your prompt attention in regards to this alleged matter. ANY and ALL “appearances” we make will be made in SPECIAL APPEARENCE only
This first half of the header is then followed by a graphic of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, along with its contact information, and this text:
Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System EDGAR Search Results for PROVINCIE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ( Also look up CANADA CIK # 0000230098 )
Mailing Address PO POX 94323 STN PROV GOVTVICTORIA A1 V8W 9V1
Business Address MINISTRY OF FINANCE620 SUPERIOR STREETVICTORIA A1 VXW 1X4 (250) 387 7125
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA CIK#: 0000836136 (see all company filings) SIC: 8888 – FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS
State location: A1 | Fiscal Year End: 0331
Yes, on
every page.
The document is addressed to the New Westminster Law Courts, and commences with "FIRST NOTICE", followed by an introduction that partially replicates the header, and also provides instructions:
Attention: Lionel Yip, The Court Clerk, ALL EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS OR CROWN REPESENTATIVIES of: RIGINA, HER MAJESTY, HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH II, QUEEN ELIZABETH II, HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF CANADA, HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, THE CROWN CORPORATION and CANADA or PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA as per listed on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at
http://sec.gov/ all Judges, Magistrates, Justices of the Peace, Judicial Justices of the Peace, Super Enumerators, Crown, Crown Counsel, court clerk , Sheriff Services, Peace Officers, BAR members, LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA members and any and all other officers of the court and any other moving or alleged injured party. ON AND FOR THE RECORD we are NOT LEGAL FICTIONS, SURETY for LEGAL FICTIONS, CORPORATIONS, PERSONS, the ACCUSED, a RESIDENCE, a CITIZEN , a private BAR (British Accredited Registrar) guild member or under contract with the BAR , members BRITISH COLUMBIA LAW SOCIETY, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES or PUBLIC SERVANTS under contract for the mentioned CORPORATIONS whatsoever. Please respond within 7 days from proof of service under the penalty of perjury and full commercial liability to these 1646 questions for clarification and full disclosure. Failure to reply under the penalty of perjury and full commercial liability means the moving parties have no claim whatsoever and have agreed to the terms and conditions and fee schedule herein. Send your response by registered mail under the penalty of perjury and full commercial liability to 313 -2416 Main Street, Vancouver, British Columbia. Thank you for your prompt attention in regards to this alleged matter. ANY and ALL “appearances” we make will be made in SPECIAL APPEARENCE only.
Please file this into the alleged court file. Please make sure ALL parties listed receive this complete document. Please make sure that ALL parties listed reply to this document within 7 day from proof of service under the penalty of perjury and on their full commercial liability or they will be in default and/or dishonour
The document has two parts, an “Affidavit”, which contrary to its name does not actually swear facts but instead is a set of instructions for a questionnaire:
AFFIDAVIT
Let he who creates the liability provide the remedy
This letter is remove any and all assumptions or presumption of law. It is do so with the utmost respect to all alleged effected parties. Please read this entire document. Read the CD Big Book of CANADA. Read the CD Big Book of PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. Read and answer all the question herein. Please feel free to make copies, fill them out and return them by registered mail under the penalty of perjury and full commercial liability. For your convenience we have made it very simple and easy to answer our questions. All questions are YES, No, I Don’t Know answers. Just circle yes, no or I don’t know and attach any sworn facts or evidence you have to support your claim in fact. Make copies this entire document and provide it to any and all effected parties. Please make sure to answer the question under oath and under your full commercial liability and return the completed questions to 313 -2416 Main Street, Vancouver, British Columbia within 7 days from proof of service by registered mail.
1. We do not understand the nature and cause of these alleged proceeding whatsoever and seek clarification.
2. We do not understand the subject matter jurisdiction of these alleged proceeding whatsoever and seek clarification.
3. We do not understand who it is you are inviting to your place of business whatsoever and seek clarification. We are NOT the CAPITIZED NAME you are seeking whatsoever. Are you inviting your own CROWN COPYRIGHT dead LEGAL FICTION to your place of business?
4. We do not know or understand who you are or who you are claiming to re-present. Please provide certified true copies of: Birth Certificate, Divers Licence, Social Insurance Number, BAR card Number, Oath of Office(s) and complete job description. Exactly who are you?
5. We need to see the original sworn criminal complaint(s)and sworn statement(s) of injury from the alleged injured party(ies).
5. We need to see the original charging instruments and original warrant. Who is assuming commercial liable for endorsing these instruments?
6. We need to see the original, complete and unedited video/CCTV/audio of the alleged breach of the peace and alleged obstruction for 2012-12-13 for the entire day from enter, arrest, incarceration and to getting thrown outside on the concrete landing on alleged “release” respectively.
7. We need to see certified true copies all the original sworn affidavits from any and all parties making any statements, will says, notes, documents, audio, video, narratives, conclusions, supplementary information, synopsis, back ground FOTL Ideology and complete SPROS files respectively.
Thank you for your valuable time regarding this important and urgent alleged matter. Enclosed is one cd with the big book of CANADA, The big Book of PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA and this entire 113 page document along with a 113 page hardcopy document with 1647 questions seeking clarification cross referenced with the 45 page report to crown counsel and please take note our new fee schedule as well. Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions understanding or you need any clarification at all. We are here to help.
I am uncertain as to whether The Big Book of Canada identified is this children’s reference text by Christopher Moore (
http://www.amazon.ca/The-Big-Book-Canad ... 0887764576) but I did not find any alternative text with that name.
What follows are the 1646 questions. Many are multiple choice: Yes, No, I don’t know. Sometimes the questions are sort of intelligible:
15a. Is this private commercial BAR guild court operating under the presumption of Roman Law? YES NO I do not know
I'm going with "No" to that one.
Other times it is as if one is looking at some kind of bizarre Turing test – and the machine half of the equation is having a very bad day. Take question 10 and its 5 sub-questions, 10a through 10e:
10. Exactly what and who is the “ACCUSED”? Is QUESTION #5.
10a. SEE: QUESTION # 5. Have you answered these QUESTIONS? YES NO I do not know
10b SEE: QUESTION # 5. Have you answered these QUESTIONS? YES NO I do not know
10c SEE: QUESTION # 5. Have you answered these QUESTIONS? YES NO I do not know
10d SEE: QUESTION # 5. Have you answered these QUESTIONS? YES NO I do not know
10e SEE: QUESTION # 5. Have you answered these QUESTIONS? YES NO I do not know
Othertimes, the gentle but well-intentioned questionee can be excused for experiencing total paralysis:
266. Civilian Witness List – Blacks Law 4th edition, pg 313 – Civilian. One who is skilled or versed in the civil law Blacks Law 4th edition pg 312 Civilian Law – Civil law, Roman Law and Roman Civil Law are convertible phrases.
Have you answered QUESTIONS # 266? YES NO I do not know .
Or for lacking the philosophical basis to respond:
11. What and who is HIS? Define and physically identify HIS.
There’s 111 pages of these. The questions become increasingly repetitious, too, sometimes with the same question repeated 4-5 times in a row, with no apparent distinction between each. Othertimes the same or similar questions are scattered throughout the document, for example variations on “FOTL – What is FOTL?” appears as questions 316, 885, 893, 897, 942, 1175, 1176, 1191, 1243, 1590, and 1591. Are these inquiries functionally different? It doesn’t seem that way, take questions 1590 and 1591:
1590. FOTL – What is the FOTL? Who is the FOTL?
1591. FOTL – What is the FOTL? Who is the FOTL?
I oh so hope that Alex provides a copy of this to his psychiatric professionals.
The second half of the 113 page paperwork is a fee schedule, effective Dec. 20, 2013 located WAY back at page 112. Penalties are not too atypical, $2000/hour for being detained, $50,000 per strip search, but “digging through my brief case or back pack is BILLED out at $8,000.00 CAN.” Confiscated property is worth 10 fold its replacement cost, while any physical injury is worth $2 million per injury.
However, the way the fee schedule handles interactions with the state is unique (to my experience) as it classifies these items as “orders”, and puts many criteria on these orders – otherwise they are presumably not orders, and therefore the government actors don’t have to pay! The fee schedule starts, as usual, with a stern warning:
Please read and make sure you understand and agree the terms and conditions herein before making any ORDERS.
If you do not agree to the term and conditions herein we do NOT want to contract with you in ANY capacity whatsoever. Please be absolutely sure you wish to contract. We do not work for free. As we are sure you do not work for free either.
Terms and Conditions of all ORDERS are as follows:
All ORDERS are as is, where is. No expressed or implied warranty. No refunds. All orders are payable in full on demand apon the execution of the ORDER. All orders are subject to a 2% per month compounding interest charge. All overdue accounts are subject to collections. All over due accounts are liable for any and all collection costs. All over due accounts in default and/or dishonour are subject to and agree to have any and all available public and/or private assets seized, sold or kept to provide remedy and/or satisfaction for account(s ) in default and/or dishonor.
What follows are a bizarre set of ‘characteristics of an order’, which it seems to me makes the imposition of the fee schedule for government misconduct impossible, or at a minimum, highly unlikely!
1. All ORDERS have to have the four, 4, following elements to satisfy the conditions of a proper ORDER: FULL AND COMPLETE DISCLOSURE. EQUAL AND VALUEABLE CONSIDERATION. VOLUNTARY CONSENT OF BOTH PARTIES. ALL ORDERS HAVE TO BE IN WRITING AND HAVE A WET AUTOGRAPH BY BOTH VOLUNTARY PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT.
2. All ORDERS have to be declared as ORDERS. Anything not declared as an ORDER is NOT an ORDER and generates no obligation or duty of performance whatsoever. We do not work for free.
…
6. The man, women, AGENT or EMPLOYEE is liable for any and all ORDERS. Identification has to be presented to place an ORDER of any kind. All ORDERS have to be in writing. Please see #1.
Alex accepts payment in Bitcoins, gold or silver – fiat currencies are inherently instable due to hyperinflation. But of course, if one of those mean policy enforcement officers were to “throw him to the ground!”, but not apparently submit an order for that in writing and with a “wet autograph” then presumably no order would exist, and the government wouldn’t have to pay.
It’s all very … different. Familiar - but still different.
I leave the gentle reader with one more, imponderable flow of inquiry:
199. SEE: QUESTION # 197.
Ok, I'll go to question #197:
197. Annual Report – SEE: QUESTION # 4. Have you answered QUESTION # 197? YES NO I do not know .
Uhm ... yes? No? I don't know? I can't know? Please Alex, don't beat me! I AM trying to comply!
(And they criticize our "legalese"!)
SMS Möwe
