Someone that relies on google to much wrote: Eyewitness account to part of The Tom Crawford May Day Court battle (1st May 2015) - by Liz Watson in Bournemouth.....
The atmosphere, commitment and energy of the group that attended the 1st of May event, was phenomenal. A real sense of unity with a common goal: to see Justice is done and to dismantle the lies and corruption that have been relied upon to date, to spin the matter this far, without correction as yet.
HMCTS ,under the iron-fist of the provable ill-intention and hidden agendas of the Crown Corporation, appeared to deliberately obstruct Justice on Tom Crawford's case by shunting the case into a very small court room - over in the Youth & Family Court (wholly inappropriate of course) but clearly a deliberate act to try to 'contain' the opposition to their shenanigans. With only 10 available seats in the cramped gallery, they prevented a 'Grand Jury' of peers from being constitutionally created and relied upon - all by design?.
I witnessed Tom Crawford raising a critical preliminary issue with Judge Godsmark (interesting name, right?) which issue is fundamental to whether the proceedings may continue or not: i.e. that the "claim" appears to have NO VALID ISSUANCE - namely, no fee has been paid for bringing the claim, and if I remember correctly, no seal exists on the 'claim' form. When confronted with this truth and the assertion was rightly made "there is no valid claim here because it hasn't even been validly issued", Judge Godsmark retorted "No, no, it has been validly issued: it is a MONEY CLAIM ON LINE".
Shock horror: He gave their game away! A "money claim issued on line" is capped at £25,000! How, then, can it possibly be fraudulently converted into a "possession claim" against a property valued at far more than 25k (!) - and done without any Pre Action protocol being lawfully observed and ignoring the cap of £25k, and with no Consumer Credit Agreement in place, which has to be duly signed by the offeror and acceptor (required in Law, as this is the 'contract' which any money claim tries to enforce)....!? It's clearly a SCAM!
So I stood up in the Court at the back on impulse, clearly moved by this attempted stitch-up and obvious abuse of court process, and I said words to this effect (paraphrased): "I am a Public Intervenor. I've worked as an investigator with the Serious fraud office on important cases, voluntarily and in the Public Interest. These proceedings aren't valid. Surely the Court must realise that a MONEY CLAIM issued on line and capped at a claim value of no more than £25k AND requiring a compliant Consumer Credit Agreement to be duly signed by both sides, can NOT possibly be converted into a Possession claim against a property worth far far more than £25,000? This is clearly a scam! Why is the court going along with it and entertaining it as if it is legitimate?"
At this, Judge Godsmark ran out of the court room! That's right, he exited so rapidly that it was very clear he couldn't run away fast enough. He was ashamed and embarrassed and had no answer. The same applies to the legal team of the accuser. Any judge worth his salt would have dealt with it in a proper way, arbitrating it impartially and allowing due process of Law, not just run and hide like this man did .
These court sessions nearly all come down to dishonesty by the HMCTS in acting without any lawful Power of Attorney!
If people better understood the 'game' of the Law Society and its army of members and the Bar Council too, they would expose the fallacious arguments being used to try to legitimise "claims" which are little more than a 'pile of leaves'.
i.e. no right of audience where there is no case to answer to and invalid paperwork and/or discrepant material defects and errors contained in the frequently incoherent claim being brought, to name but a few common denominators in cases such as Tom Crawford's.
Obviously shame-faced for being hung by his own patard of failing to execute his judicial obligation to discharge the proceedings with honour, many of us witnessed Judge Godsmark acting in dishonour. Instead of doing the right thing because it is just and right and in accordance with the 'Overriding Objectives' of the Court, he had apparently "sat in fraud" :-because he had full knowledge that the claim is 100% invalid and is therefore unenforceable. So why did he keep the spin going? With no valid issuance of the "claim" in place or in evidence, it cannot proceed as a possession claim, demonstrating there are no actual "proceedings". Therefore there is NO CASE TO ANSWER TO.
This then begs the question: are HMCTS even using "real judges"?
Why aren't any HMCTS judges ever monitored or held accountable?
Why do many of these judges engage in illegal case-fixing and inequality of arms? What qualifies a man or woman who is an ADVOCATE (and frequently a practicing advocate or solicitor) to sit as a Judge or member of the JUDICIARY who are supposed to be on the opposite side? (the advocate presents to the Judiciary - so effectively they present to themselves and there is no separation of powers and conflicts of interest everywhere). Its a closed shop and game that is almost impossible for a Litigant in Person to 'win' unless they are wide awake and more alert than those pedalling the false claim through the court system.
After my contribution made orally in the Public Interest, the ushers soon came over to me and asked me to leave the court room. When I asked "on what grounds?" I was given no plausible reason but merely a wry smile. It appeared that Judge Godsmark had asked the court ushers to strike a 'bargain' that "if I left the court room, then he would re-appear".....
he had effectively lost all jurisdiction when he ran out, and given what I had alerted to the Public attention of the invalid and unfair 'hearing', he could not regain jurisdiction by consent unless I left that court room. Not wishing to be obstructive in any way, but only to serve the Cause of Justice, I agreed to exit the court room as requested - knowing that the work had been done as the truth had been placed on the court record! But will Judge Godsmark step up to the plate and do the right thing? This remains to be seen.
It is my understanding that the topic of the (clearly rigged) 'hearing' then moved on to an examination of the type of mortgage, allegedly an 'Endowment' mortgage. But given that an endowment is merely like an investment plan to facilitate eventual reimbursement of capital outlaid, then why is it even remotely relevant to the invalidly brought 'claim' which has no right of possessing Tom Crawford's familial home in the first place? The claim is invalidly bought and is void ab initio, so why this distraction about the endowment status? This appears to be a distraction technique.
It does appear to be a degree of prevarication going on here....did they obviously see me as a disruptive force to their unsavoury agenda to rig the outcome of the whole matter? Or something else? If it was meant to be a "fair" hearing then how could it be "fair" if the Judge had not only refused to allow Tom Crawford his rights under the Legal Services Act to choose who he wants to represent him (this was unethically and unlawfully disallowed), but he then FAILED TO ADDRESS the fact the "claim" (so-called) is a nullity and should be struck out under Civil Procedure Rule 3.4.2 (a) and (b) as having "no prospects of success" and nonsensically contrived.
One interesting point is that the Judge (somewhat predictably iMHO), then took the cowardly route of "reserving" his judgment. This can be an indication that he feels unable to make the lawful and right decision without referring to his peers and the Privy Council for directions.
Frequently, on important cases, I've uncomfortably observed that the Privy Council WRITE OUT the scripted "judgment" (so called) BEFORE any (alleged) "hearing" even takes place or begins! This demonstrates that they think nothing of rigging the outcome of cases! i.e. no due process of Law, no fair hearing is even possible, when this occurs.
Such things show the case is being conducted in a PRIVATE (not a Public) capacity!
This contemptible act of pre-preparing a bogus "judgment" BEFORE a court session, means that vital evidence is dismissed before it is even presented (!), and so of course, means 'no fair hearing'! It is a scam they often pull. So don't hold your breath. I believe it could go either way. If the Judge 'does his worst' and makes a bogus "judgment" , we were all witnesses to the invalid proceedings because the fundamental issue of the claim type being limited to £25k is sufficient grounds to dismiss the Claim immediately, awarding full costs and compensation to Tom Crawford and his entire family for AN ABUSE OF THE COURT PROCESS by the Claimant solicitors.
The fact that Judge Godsmark had already run out of the Court room no less than THREE TIMES but the attendees in the Public Gallery and Tom Crawford himself exercised extraordinary patience and persistence by allowing the judge 3 lifelines - but is this a wise move, we must ask ourselves? Why is credence being gifted to the unworthy? Where is the lawful compliance with the Pre-action protocol required on all possession claims, or with the Power of Attorney Act and Law of Property Act (Misc Provisions) 1989 and the Bill of Exchange Act 1882 etc etc?
The fact is, HMCTS are no longer fit for purpose. They offer a rigged game, under the command of the Crown Corporation.
Worse, the Crown Corporation is a legal fiction operating a totally duplicitous (and therefore highly conflicted) set up: namely, their own website describes that they are OUTSIDE OF THE LAWS OF ENGLAND! Check it out and see for yourself.
This means that logically, Law breakers may not be Law makers nor Law enforcers. So what are we all doing, tolerating this utterly dishonest set up and rigged state of Public affairs? Further, there is an unlawful (and illegal) and treasonous MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) between the 46 police corporations in Britain (who nearly all mis-use their force and ignore their PACE codes, many of whom are flagrantly abusing their positions of trust), and the Law Society. In effect, this lawless MOU tells the police to "back off" any contentious (legal land) cases, so as to leave them to their own devices - and so it sanctions sometimes very serious, crimes!
The police, of course, as employees of the corrupted and treasonous Crown Corporation who are being manipulated by Rothschild since at least 300 years (rothschild hijacked the Monarchy in The Crash and took over), whose sole goal seems to be a total takeover of all the assets, land, children and property of the indigenous people of Britain.
It is Rothschild aka The Crown Corporation who has driven our beautiful England into the ground, pillaged all its trade, assets, land, through a unsustainable debt-based money system which serves only the criminal Elite, and has serenaded a love of money well beyond anything the assets of the People can support, with such a voracious appetite for stealth and acquisition at any cost to the people of England. Rothschild has corporatised everything, even turning England into UK PLC' so as to attempt to bring it under the EU's control and drive it into a one-world currency. Mayer Amschild rothschild's famous quote sums this up:
"give me control of a Nation's money, and I care not who makes its laws"
Put a different way, we the People of Britain, are being ROBBED by the Crown Corporation, via all the HM Departments and in particular by HMCTS. It involves financial genocide and widespread displacement, executed ruthlessly and lawlessly against the People of England, under the guise of "the Authorities".
After all, with such lawlessness in Public buildings, how can any of us ignore these irregularities and unjust goings-on? It concerns ALL of us, we are ALL 'at risk'. Anything that is registered with the Crown Corporation, ends up being taken - this includes land, properties and even children! We have open-shut and compelling evidence of criminal collusion and complicity with HMLR (Land Registry) and with the banksters, stealing property by pulling the wool over people's eyes - theft by pen and paper! Errors of omission, invalid proceedings, deliberate non-disclosure, denial of due process of Law, blockading access to Justice, pricing themselves beyond the reach of the ordinary man or average earner (why DO the Legal Profession receive an average of 60 times the average wage of the non-legal professionals?) - and now HMTS have even increased their court fees by some 600%! Is this some kind of joke? or just yet another ploy to get people to relinquish all hope of bringing a claim against their oppressors / ruthless paymasters and adversaries who are conspiring to asset strip them?
The majority of people looking at this case and hearing Tom's internet pleas, will realise and agree that Tom Crawford deserves full restitution and restoral of his position, along with aggravated damages for the distress and unnecessary alarm caused to him and his family by the pirates of the Admiralty "courts" who have entertained a provably invalid 'claim'.
This applies to all of us - WE ARE ALL TOM CRAWFORD to the Courts, who can only attack the legal fiction of your given 'name'...but never touch the real you, who remains the true sovereign in any court room and beyond.
Their apparent game plan is to keep YOU in the dock, to pin "liability" on to you even when no evidence exists to make this possible, and to steal or dispossess you of your family home - all to feed the mouths and pay the wages of the treasonous Crown employees whose agenda
Although I haven't examined the paperwork on Tom's case, it would appear that none of the judges involved on this case have, either! I knew something was very wrong when the judge insisted the claim was valid when it clearly is not valid. Why ARE these 'officers of the court" condoning the Law and the Truth? Why are they acting lawlessly? Is it really because they made up their own rules and are therefore busily implementing them, regardless of the cost to the People and regardless of the casualties of the Stasi-State that Britain has become?
These Public courts are OUR courts, and we should all have "free unfettered access" to them. We, the indigenous people of England, are the sovereign power of this country and this is OUR land and these are OUR properties. They do not belong to the Crown, who has been busily filching land and property for many years now - and as the man-made fake "debt" compounds and increases, the land and property grabbing has correspondingly escalated alongside it. No surprises there.
Interestingly, the controlled Media of the Crown Corporation have already tried to mislead the Public by falsely reporting on mainstream TV an implication that "the angry mob were, by implication, unruly" and hanging the judge's 'reserve judgment' on this factor as being the reason it may be 'served by email' ! The opposite is, in fact true.
In fact, one of the observers and by-standers who attended the May Day event, sent me a film footage he took where he caught on camera the fact that I was assaulted aggressively by the Group 4 Serco-employed security staff at the Court - all done apropos of nothing, with nil provocation, purely because they refused entry to we the People who own the courts and Public buildings and are turning a Nelsonian blind eye to the fact that fraudulent "claims" are being peddled through their collapsing System in the first place! We have every justification to feel outraged by these gross inequities.
With an average statistic of about one person being divested of their home "every 20 minutes", isn't it about time we placed them under scrutiny and begin asking them the right questions, to turn this endemic abuse of process around by 360 degrees?
I've prepared some didactic videos to make some suggestions as to the right questions to ask if anyone is facing illegal or questionable repossession of their home (and all cases do not comply with one or more of the pre-requisites for a claim to be valid). You can also check out my Facebook JUDGE WATCH Group site for valuable information.
(Written on 4 May 2015 by Liz Watson, Founder of One Voice Action Group and Public Intervenor acting in the Public Interest)
. He has been successful, what is really needed is to see what the judge writes.
