Peter's new website seemed more legal, less fraudulent, than the previous one. (By "fraudulent", I mean Peter making untrue and misleading representations, knowing them to be untrue and misleading, intending to cause loss to others and gains for himself.) A load of stuff on his old site wasn't on the new one.
I now suspect he simply hadn't go around to copying it. His
Benefits page already claimed:
There is movement to prepare cheque books which every client will possess. This book will allow you to pay for utilities and other services as well as taxes and miscellaneous goods.
But now
WeRe Bank's front page contains some additional text that was copied from the old site, moving it further away from being legal.
Peter wrote:“Don’t Fight it! Just Pay it!”
The WeRe Bank chequeing account from ReMovement provides you with
ASSURED DEBT ERADICATION ON ALL “PUBLIC SIDE OF THE LEDGER LIABILITIES” as follows:
CREDIT CARD DEBTS
BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENTS
MORTGAGE RE-PAYMENTS
MORTGAGE ARREARS
CREDIT AGREEMENTS
CREDIT CARD RE-PAYMENTS
STUDENT LOANS
CREDIT CARD ARREARS
COUNCIL TAX DEMANDS
COUNCIL TAX ARREARS
TV LICENCE
ROAD TAX
H.M.R.C - VAT, PAYE, SA, FINES
COURT FINES - ANY DEMAND FOR PAYMENT FROM H.M.Courts
SHERIFF OR BAILIFF ORDERS/WARRANTS FOR MONETARY ORDERS
SPEEDING, PARKING TICKETS - ANY POLICE ENFORCEMENT ORDERS
VEHICLE, TRACTOR, MACHINERY CREDIT REPAYMENTS
PROBATE DEBTS - FAMILY ESTATE
UTILITIES - GAS, WATER, ELECTRIC
This is very explicit: debts due to HMRC etc will be eradicated by a WeRe cheque.
Peter doesn't claim that WeRe Bank will honour cheques by following the sucker's instruction to pay HMRC or whoever. Peter's claim is merely that the debt will be eradicated. But this claim is false. Even real banks don't make this claim. A cheque may be rejected for many reasons, even if the bank is solvent and the payer's account has sufficient funds.
On his FAQ
How to ensure your cheque clears?, after suggesting you take your girlfriend to witness you delivering the cheque, point 7 says:
Peter wrote:7.The bank MUST present the cheque for clearing - no questions, no debate no wiggle room! It's THE LAW.
But it isn't the law. No law says the payee, or the payee's bank, MUST present the cheque.
Peter's wording is "present the cheque for clearing". But the
Bills of Exchange Act 1882 doesn't use this phrase. Cheques are presented to the drawer's bank, not for
clearing but for
paying. Peter has claimed many times that he "clears" cheques, for example over the phone. This is a false representation of what the drawer's bank should do: it should
pay, as requested on the cheque.
Peter has always said, and still says, that he won't pay. On his FAQ
Why do we ask for payments in £ sterling when you claim you have your own unit of money of account? he says:
Peter wrote:Also you should be fully aware that any cheque signed off in STG £ is honoured to the PAYEE not in STERLING but in Re units – which are “monetary units of account” “cheque book money” or “bank ledger money of account”.
So cheques bounce somewhere along the line. The sucker still hasn't paid his HMRC tax bill. The FAQ
How to ensure your cheque clears? has some final advice:
Peter wrote:8. Stand firm - make the NOTARIAL PROTEST if they refuse and then tell them you'll see them in court.
Yes, court cases will happen. Perhaps they already have. A sucker is taken to court for not paying his bills. "I paid it with a rubber cheque" won't work.
Peter's claims that his rubber cheques will eradicate debts are false.