The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 3076
- Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 1:16 am
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Takes 5 seconds to take a picture of the warrant with your phone and post it on Facebook.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Don't forget they have to send it to London by courier, so the esteemed Mr Ebert can go over it and then send it back to the other forensic expert, Guy Taylor for a second opinion, which will result in it being called a fake warrant.Jeffrey wrote:Takes 5 seconds to take a picture of the warrant with your phone and post it on Facebook.
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 950
- Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:17 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
What case was that? I need to catch up.Bones wrote:I see Monika turned up with good old Micheal O'Dercia (aka the rogue male) who also lost his cases tooBlueBurmese wrote:Oh dear - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -home.html
Monika Godos, 34, of Woodthorpe, is charged with assaulting Sergeant Shipley in the execution of his duty by spitting in his face. She also denied the allegations.
Was he a schoolteacher? Have a recollection that he was.
Anything known about Monika?
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
You didn't really believe that this was going to be the end of it. I said earlier Ceylon in his latest interview saysYiamCross wrote:Well I don't know, first they say the warrant doesn't exist and then when it's produced, they find fault with it.
I said they wouldn't have even if the warrant was produced for them on the day, because they would find fault with it. They used this warrant bollocks simply as an excuse to invade and take over the property because they had absolutely no excuse for doing what they did.is all we wanted was to see the Warrant [unicorn] and we would have come down straight away.
And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
CEYLON AT HIS BEST >>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqUhR4n ... g&index=91
Hainings arrest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2MI07tVoh0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqUhR4n ... g&index=91
Hainings arrest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2MI07tVoh0
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:33 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
BlueBurmese wrote:Oh dear - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -home.html
I distinctly recall Amanda previously saying they could easily pay off the entire amount but they were fighting it on principle. So I wonder if she'd consider herself as lying to the public then or lying to the public now.Amanda C wrote:My parents lost everything when the bailiffs took it away. We aren't rich, we're normal people.
Perhaps she'd claim to be telling the truth in both instances - at that time they could afford it but the fighting has drained their resources so they can no longer afford anything.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
No you're not normal, normal people do not behave like they do.Amanda C wrote: we're normal people.
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:00 pm
- Location: Soho London
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant.wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
BHF wrote:
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
It shows your mentality to think someone would make the effort to post something on the internet that was untrue.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 11:41 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
I found it strange that Crawford appeared for his own defense at court and seemed to have dropped his whole legal team O`Berka, Ebert &Taylor Forensics at Law. They will love this of course as they watch Crawford get convicted they will be able to tell him he lost because he didn't follow their advice.rumpelstilzchen wrote:Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant.wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
CEYLON AT HIS BEST >>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqUhR4n ... g&index=91
Hainings arrest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2MI07tVoh0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqUhR4n ... g&index=91
Hainings arrest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2MI07tVoh0
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Taylor couldn't attend as he was in court himself today up in Hereford getting his fine and community servicewanglepin wrote:I found it strange that Crawford appeared for his own defense at court and seemed to have dropped his whole legal team O`Berka, Ebert &Taylor Forensics at Law. They will love this of course as they watch Crawford get convicted they will be able to tell him he lost because he didn't follow their advice.rumpelstilzchen wrote:Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant.wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:23 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
I think we should get our facts straight. He's a consultant in legal forensics. That's what he said and I believe him. Damned if I can be bothered to find the video but I'm sure he wouldn't have said it if it wasn't true. He's been trained, you know. Not sure if house trained counts for much in a law court though it would certainly be a very bad thing if he weren'trumpelstilzchen wrote:Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant.wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 3:02 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Latest on the warrant on EFOTB
Craig Crawford It's a warrant you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
Craig Crawford It's a warrant you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
I don't take sides, I read all the facts and then come to my own conclusions
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 1:26 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
And that is what it should be Amanda because after all, it was a County Court bailiff that executed the warrant to evict your parents and NOT a High Court Enforcement Officer.letissier14 wrote:Amanda PikeEviction the fraud of the bank
10 mins · Edited ·
I can confirm now though that it is a county court warrant and NOT a high court writ.
Looking forward to the next supposed 'defect'.
Last edited by Bungle on Fri Jul 31, 2015 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TUCO said to me:
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
“I envy you for the job that you do in helping advise people. If I could choose an occupation, this is what I would like to do. Much of the advice that I pass onto people is heavily influenced by your posts”.
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Like reading it and understanding it, which in the Crawford's case will likely take some time.Amanda Pike wrote:WE NOW HAVE THE UNICORN IN OUR POSSESSION. I REPEAT WE HAVE THE UNICORN......However its got no horn what so ever and is about as useful as a piece of bog roll! (Shocker) I can't currently go into it to much as we've got some things to sort out in relation to it........
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
letissier14 wrote:Latest on the warrant on EFOTB
Craig warrant It's a Crawford you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:41 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
It's a criminal charge, O'Bonkers, Errorbert and Trailor only specialise in civil matters.wanglepin wrote:I found it strange that Crawford appeared for his own defense at court and seemed to have dropped his whole legal team O`Berka, Ebert &Taylor Forensics at Law. They will love this of course as they watch Crawford get convicted they will be able to tell him he lost because he didn't follow their advice.rumpelstilzchen wrote:Well, to be fair, he is a legal consultant.wanglepin wrote: And as already been mentioned, Guy Taylor will "forensically examine" the warrant and find it to be "fraudulent".
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:33 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
Leaves one wondering how Craig expects a warrant to be produced.letissier14 wrote:Craig Crawford It's a warrant you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
Electronic printing = anyone can do it
Manual typing = anyone can do it
Hand-Written = anyone can do it
Chiseled in granite with a laser - ok, not everyone has a laser handy, but granite can be reasonably easily acquired.
So if Craig is complaining because the warrant could be easily electronically produced and printed (and I assume by anyone) - it really leaves one wondering what form he believes an acceptable warrant would come in.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:41 pm
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
One written in blood?
-
- Slavering Minister of Auto-erotic Insinuation
- Posts: 3759
- Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:35 am
- Location: Quatloos Immigration Control
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
OOOH NOOOOO! It wasn't a high court order? I am so disappointed. If it had been a High Court order you could have been paying interest on the outstanding amount until settled, IIRC.Bungle wrote:And that is what it should be Amanda because after all, it was a County Court bailiff that executed the warrant to evict your parents and NOT a High Court Enforcement Officer.letissier14 wrote:Amanda PikeEviction the fraud of the bank
10 mins · Edited ·
I can confirm now though that it is a county court warrant and NOT a high court writ.
"There is something about true madness that goes beyond mere eccentricity." Will Self
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
- Location: Laughing at Tuco
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
http://roguemale.org/2013/12/06/the-chr ... -mortgage/Pox wrote:What case was that? I need to catch up.Bones wrote:
I see Monika turned up with good old Micheal O'Dercia (aka the rogue male) who also lost his cases too
Was he a schoolteacher? Have a recollection that he was.
Anything known about Monika?
"The Rogue Male has been homeless for THREE years now. He is, quite reasonably, somewhat pissed off at this state of affairs."
Not the best person to be giving advice to someone about how to save their home
"26 September 1989 ~ the implied contract in every mortgage deed prior to the 1989 act no longer has legal effect, on the basis that s2 prescribes that it can only be expressed in writing, signed by both parties, with all of the fairly negotiated terms in a single document."
"The signing of the deed and the deposit of said with B&B created an implied contract for a mortgage in the future, which was void for lack of compliance with section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, as it had to be executed by both parties, in accord with the Companies Act 1985, 36A Execution of documents: England and Wales and s.27(1) of the Land Registration Act 2002."
s.2 applies to contracts and not deeds.
"26 August 2009. At the hearing at Nottingham County Court, in spite of the counter claim which included a Notarised Affidavit of Obligation (one which remains unrebutted), His Honour Judge Inglis issued a consequently VOID order for possession in favour of B&B"
"4 November 2010 ~ The house was unlawfully and violently possessed by agents of the Claimant. In breach of due process and the peace, no notice was served on the owner. The use of 21 police officers, numerous bailiffs and other assorted agents illustrate how the house was taken by way of violence and deception, with excessive force and coercion. Mr David Caress, Bailiff, failed to serve the warrant on the Defendants, Rogue Male and Lifetime Tenant, who were falsely arrested in their own home, kidnapped and imprisoned for 6 hours at Bridewell Police Station, Nottingham, before being released without charge. The actual eviction was marked by the use of excessive force, the endangering of C’s life and was unlawfully aided by the accompanying police officers, whom the Defendants have reason to believe were hired by the B&B to enforce the VOID order."
You can read the rest for yourself. All very similar to what Tom is doing and trying to argue now. Much like the rest of Tom's legal team Ceylon, Ebert, Taylor and Bernica - O'deria has no understanding or comprehension of the law.
-
- Admiral of the Quatloosian Seas
- Posts: 1874
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 11:12 am
- Location: Laughing at Tuco
Re: The Second Battle of Crawford's Castle, a Nottingham Farce...
As readers of this thread Craiggie and Tommy, grow a pair and post it for everyone to see.letissier14 wrote:Latest on the warrant on EFOTB
Craig Crawford It's a warrant you can print off - it's all bullshit. Haha
I already know you won't