k1w1 » 2015 09 13, Sun 7:39 am wrote:It’s only you who seems think they should be disappointed for what they received.
That was your estimate of what others think relative to an opinion voiced by Lord Ed. Obviously mistaken as there was clear proof that he was not alone in the particular thought expressed - as I clearly indicated. As a result, I think I'll take your opinion of estimating what kind of person will show up anywhere for any reason with the huge grain of salt it deserves.
As for your obvious trolling efforts, in the future I'll pass, but I'll respond once to one form of trolling you employed to show it is trolling.
You're deliberately misrepresenting something I said, changing context and then attempting to challenge me to prove something that would be virtually impossible to prove without being there at one of his seminars and taking a poll of every person attending - and trusting each of those individuals to be honest. And then drawing the conclusion that the results of that one seminar must apply equally to all others - to avoid such, one must show up at a reasonable distribution of his seminars to get a more accurate representation of who shows up to those.
The misrepresentation:
k1w1 wrote:You say you think some people really do attend Clifford seminars with the genuine expectation they’re going to receive legitimate legal information. Really? Who?
I didn't say anything of the sort. And I challenge you to prove I did by pointing exactly to where I did say that.
What I did say was that I "happen to agree mostly with Lord Ed with regards what's being presented" and that you did not speak for me when you said "It’s only you who seems think they should be disappointed for what they received".
To clear the record with regards my opinion as I hold it:
Has Clifford been presenting information as though it's legitimate legal information all the while claiming it's not? Absolutely.
Has he been presenting that info as though it has worked for him on the Legal Front all the while getting himself deeper and deeper into Judicial trouble with those very tactics? Absolutely.
Have people attended with the "genuine expectation they're going to receive legitimate legal info"? I didn't previously speak to this point, so here's my response on that: That's a strong possibility and has likely occurred at a number of Clifford's events - but no guarantee, just a strong possibility. So far, you're the only one who has taken a "only this type of person would show up" position.
Whatever people attending genuinely expect, should they be disappointed for what they received from Clifford after having paid him anything? Absolutely - and from my position it does not matter what they genuinely expect - they should be disappointed in actually paying Clifford for anything he presents.