A few weeks ago on his FB page he said he'd be holding weekly meetings by now.timcurgenven1 wrote:Peters meetings seem to have dried up.
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php? ... 9179700768
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
A few weeks ago on his FB page he said he'd be holding weekly meetings by now.timcurgenven1 wrote:Peters meetings seem to have dried up.
Plaintiff - I have a lot of moral support so you can't evict me.Bones wrote:
So... if he believed in it (or strongly wanted to) why didn't he accept Re units to pay for the ongoing account fees?littleFred wrote:But it is a scam that (I think) Peter believed in, or wanted to believe in.
Yep, there is something missing .......MONEY!WeRebank concept is great….But is there something missing?
It would be interesting to know if the printer of the last batch of cheque books was willing to accept and did accept one of the WeRe cheques they had printed themselves as payment for the printing. And, if they refused payment by one of their own cheques, why? If Peter cannot even get the firm that prints WeRe cheques to accept them as payment that would show that the printer did not consider them to be legitimate cheques.Hyrion wrote:
I can understand the actual physical cheques costing money - why did he charge such a high fee for those instead of their actual cost so he wasn't out of pocket on GBP?
I don't mean to drag us off topic here but I would look at the $180k in student loans as being illustrative of the mark's financial illiteracy. It is true college education is insanely expensive here in the US, but there is NO WAY she needed to take out that many loans at 95% of schools:Pox wrote:She does talk about having more than one student loan so maybe she dropped a course part way through?chronistra wrote:Costs very much depend on the university.mufc1959 wrote:
That's about what 3-4 years of university costs in the USA, according to friends of mine (who are paying off their student loans with, you know, actual money).
To rack up $180K, this lady either spend more than four years or she picked a particularly expensive school.
Whatever way you look at it, she wasted her money as what university education she had clearly fell on deaf ears!
Then we have a idiot who ignores all Rob's questions saying they do work, drum roll, and producing the First Plus letters as proof.Postby creditshampoo » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:13 pm
Yea there is something missing.
It doesn't work.
But not this cretin. he's gone the full WeRe rout and is using Peters Legal Servicesmufc1959 wrote:The scales are falling from Robswift's eyes ...
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... ead#unread
I wonder what they will charge this idiot and who will be on his legal team?by meeh101 » Mon Sep 14, 2015 10:40 pm
From personal experience: disappointed in the lack of support as respects the court room environment... In my particular instance I even placed the matter with Freeman Legal Services;
And Robswift can't seem to push himself to actually admit the 'bank' was a complete balls up from the beginning not to mention it is a con and they have all been suckeredmufc1959 wrote:The scales are falling from Robswift's eyes ...http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... ead#unread
Robswift
Agreed Luke.... the concept of Were was a good one but so far it has failed to deliver on it's promises in a massive way!
Like the lunatics taking over the asylum?grixit wrote:I think Robswift is working himself up to taking over. After all, anyone in the world can print fake checks, send them out, and make up some bogus instructions to "clear" them. If Peter of Neverland has lost interest in the job, well why not Rob, then?
It could be. But I would have to ask: who is Robswift? Is he just a mouth piece and would he attend court in defense of those who have used his worthless cheques that Peter has so far failed to do after all his promises to help in the court room? Will the goofers be suckered again!!!!1!!!!.grixit wrote:I think Robswift is working himself up to taking over. If Peter of Neverland has lost interest in the job, well why not Rob, then?
I majored in physics, minored in economics and use computer science in my daily work life. Imagine my surprise at PoE's declaration of a new law of economics and physics. (Conservation of angular momentum, a principle near and dear to me, would ordinarily forbid energy disappearing somewhere and reappearing somewhere else without passing through intervening space. Neither information theory or physics or economics has a conservation of numerical figure law like PoE proposes, so that's a double Nobel prize and, but for an age-disqualification, Fields medal as well.)Jeffrey wrote:In the interest of science
...
Per the laws of conservation of energy, he is now $500,000 richer and must update his side of the ledger, as well as pay any corresponding UK income taxes.
Deadbeatdad wrote
I wonder if some cheques are just easier to clear? Ie.£14k must be virtually risk free & irresistible income for the smaller finance companies in these difficult times
Unbelievable!mufc1959 wrote:The scales are falling from Robswift's eyes ...
http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/v ... ead#unread
And, honestly, of PoE doesn't have hardcore freetards like Robswift on board, he's on a hiding to nothing. He'll end up persona non grata in the Sov Cit community.
In the US, there are also some private low-quality institutions that promise distance-learning or pay-as-you-go study-at-night and are somewhat better at arraigning for student loans than job placement. My friend who got his PhD from Southampton was livid to learn that one of the internet cranks he was talking to was part of one such institution's faculty. That was an impressive level of miseducation on display.LightinDarkness wrote:Most people I know who attended college and graduate school (BA + MA) have around $70k in loans and they all went to really good public schools. The only people I know with 150k+ in loans are in extremely lucrative careers like pharmacy or medical doctors.