Rough translation:longdog wrote: Could somebody please translate that in to English
Nonsensical bullshit I just made up
Mavrik
Moderator: ArthurWankspittle
Rough translation:longdog wrote: Could somebody please translate that in to English
Nonsensical bullshit I just made up
Mavrik
(condensed it to simplify)longdog wrote:Could somebody please translate that in to Englishguilty wrote:Getting a bit desperate now...After speaking with a few companies regarding WeRe cheques, the REAL reason for not accepting them is........................because certain ones off the squatters site have been making phone calls to the companies who WeRe members have sent their cheques to, and have made allegations that the cheques are fraudulent.
Some of the companies have recordings of these calls, and they state that due to the amount and nature of the calls, have passed the recordings to the police to investigate WHERE the allegations have come from and by who.
So it seems like the squatters will be getting a visit, serves them right!
Oh how the tide turns
Mavrik
As one of the people who made a call to Barclays Fraud Department, I cannot wait for the police to knock on my door. Any day now, I'm sure.guilty wrote:Getting a bit desperate now.......because certain ones off the squatters site have been making phone calls to the companies who WeRe members have sent their cheques to, and have made allegations that the cheques are fraudulent...
That's not an allegation, it's a factual statement.have made allegations that the cheques are fraudulent
And he believed it?THAT is what I was TOLD.
Mavrik, the prepubescent Top Gun fan wouldn't know the truth, if it was written in large print and only in words of one syllable. He has changed his tune, as before he was going to beat Peter up. Mavrik, is just another GOODF with a below average IQAndyPandy wrote:It's getting better :
I posted what IS TRUE, the cops apparently ARE interested in YOUR allegations. THAT is what I was TOLD. So don't bother asking me why, go back and ask the companies you clowns have made phone calls to.
Mavrik
Yes, you moron accusations of fraud are taken seriously, especially against those perpetrating it, NOT those reporting it
It's worth remarking that if you bought a £5 note off me for £10 you'd still be getting a better deal than a WeRe bank member would be getting by buying notes off PoE.Bones wrote:I don't remember having to pay the Bank of England for £
Crikey, that's hilarious. Does he actually think the police are going to investigate dozens of people who have made good faith reports of apparent fraud? And if that happens, and they come to us and ask "why did you make that call?" then we will simply explain our reasons. There is no offence involved, and no defamation (qualified privilege).Mavrik wrote:After speaking with a few companies regarding WeRe cheques, the REAL reason for not accepting them is........................because certain ones off the squatters site have been making phone calls to the companies who WeRe members have sent their cheques to, and have made allegations that the cheques are fraudulent.
Some of the companies have recordings of these calls, and they state that due to the amount and nature of the calls, have passed the recordings to the police to investigate WHERE the allegations have come from and by who.
So it seems like the squatters will be getting a visit, serves them right!
Phoenix has believed Peter's lie that "clearing" a cheque means stating there are funds to pay the cheque but never actually paying it. As Peter will never pay out, availability of funds is irrelevant.200660SB wrote:This is indeed the problem, it is the banks that are stalling the process. I wonder if it would be possible for the companies to CLEAR the cheques themselves before sending them to their banks. Maybe Peter would have something to say about that. It's only a matter of making a phone call or sending a fax : any employee can do that, take down the information, write it on the cheque and transmit it to the bank with the mention "the cheque has ALREADY been cleared throught the SWALLOW system : monies can be cashed in."
Peter said many times that we are our own bankers, that's true (and it will be more and more so as time goes by). But that is getting true of the people who accept our cheques !!
In any way, it would be a pretty good way of getting around the stubbornness of the bankers.
Pheonix
130653LN (Lynda of Salop) wrote:This needs a court case in England, America, Canada etc.....
whether that court case proves honourable will be the next Stage in this rocket...
But I know one thing, 'we' must never give up. 'We' must continue to play this game until we become pragmatic about it, and 'they' who are corrupt, have no where to go but to CLEAR.
I pledge £100 towards court costs for whomever can stand up and take that 'punt' on behalf of us all here in England. Further I will travel to lend bodily support on the day. I suggest it should ideally be a clear case of a cheque to a Company, not one of living expenses to a landlord...rent etc. But the money will be available as soon as the case is confirmed.
Anyone else pledge a chip in?
I think its a lousy suggestion. Payees won't run around making phone calls to ask whether funds are available. They expect to get paid with no fuss or bother.200660SB wrote:Hello 130653LN,
You missed my point completely... I was drawing attention to a new way of having our cheques cleared (since this is our BIG problem, and aren't we all looking for solutions?). I suggested that this need not be done by the bank. Indeed, Peter is putting into place a "new way of banking" whereby we are our own bankers. The people receiving our cheques too, they become their own bankers nilly-willy by merely accepting our cheques ! So, I suggested that they cleared our cheques with WeRe Bank before sending them off to their bank ready to cash in... Capice? I would like to hear what Peter has to say about that, too. What do you think of this suggestion ?
Phoenix
121166YF wrote:Hi there,
This is a serious matter and I am looking at WeReBank as a solution to start the ball rolling in South Africa.
About 3 years ago I started a business with a woman helping people keep their homes. If their home was in danger of foreclosure we bought it including the equity, used the equity to help pay the bond together with their rent-to-buy so that they can have their home back after 7 years hopefully debt free (I have a special formula I use for this - you may want to look at it at some stage). We also tried to sort out their debt via "legal" channels. It was great and helped people a lot.
Last year, my investors got into trouble because their company was bought over via the stock exchange and they were in danger of losing their jobs and financial status. So we looked at moving all the properties to her investors (we each had a batch of investors). So around September last year we started the process. Very unfortunately she didn't manage this correctly and misappropriated the funds and everyone, literally everyone, the original home owners and the investors are now in dire straits.
I have to do something about this. She is going to jail, but that is not my biggest worry. My concern is all these people and their homes. The very people who were supposed to help her have now caused their demise. This is NOT something I want to be part of. I have to bring remedy.
My question is. The "investors" each sit with an average of 5 houses (Average R800,000 each house). The Re148,000 they have been allocated will not be enough to settle all the properties. These property premiums are now in arrears and the banks are starting to step in as she has not come up with remedy and despite many many routes, neither have I. It is not my fault but I don't care, I have to help these people. So here's the question: I want to get each "original" home owner onto WeReBank. I want to then get them to pay the "investor"of their property with Re. Once it is credited to the "Investor's" account at WeReBank, the "investors" should have enough to settle all the bonds for these people and then let the property transfer back to the "original owners".
So, can we do this? Will you grant us this wish?
The South African team will help to get the payments through. Two of these "investors" are already WeReBank members and have their Notes arriving today. We will do some payments and see what route the banks follow, and then we can help everyone else. There are about 70 families we can help this way if you are able to allow it.
Yvette Fourie
Did some googling, this seems to be related http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2012/34.htmllittleFred wrote: The "Bank foreclosures" thread describes an interesting situation. A two-woman company borrows money to very generously buy houses that are about to be foreclosed, allowing the residents to continue living there and eventually own the houses debt-free. If this sounds too good to be true ... yes, one of the partners scarpered with all the money, leaving investors wanting the money back and people about to be evicted. The remaining partner thinks WeRe may be the solution:
121166YF wrote: About 3 years ago I started a business with a woman helping people keep their homes. If their home was in danger of foreclosure we bought it including the equity, used the equity to help pay the bond together with their rent-to-buy so that they can have their home back after 7 years hopefully debt free (I have a special formula I use for this - you may want to look at it at some stage). We also tried to sort out their debt via "legal" channels. It was great and helped people a lot.
Last year, my investors got into trouble because their company was bought over via the stock exchange and they were in danger of losing their jobs and financial status. So we looked at moving all the properties to her investors (we each had a batch of investors). So around September last year we started the process. Very unfortunately she didn't manage this correctly and misappropriated the funds and everyone, literally everyone, the original home owners and the investors are now in dire straits.
I have to do something about this. She is going to jail, but that is not my biggest worry. My concern is all these people and their homes. The very people who were supposed to help her have now caused their demise. This is NOT something I want to be part of. I have to bring remedy.