Danny riley's latest pleadings

ASITStands · Post by **ASITStands** » Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:56 pm

Dezcad wrote:
Dr. Caligari wrote:
Too bad Riley didn't ask for any explanation of the answers.
Too bad for Riley that there are no interrogatories under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
I think he's operating under the "Jurious Spurious Rules of Criminal Procedure". Those Rules are quite flexible in that "sovereigns" can make them up as they go along and require the "servant" government to answer. :wink:

One of the advantages of "Jurious Spurious" is it sets up the case for a charge of judicial corruption. "The Court's corrupt and won't hear the law!" Etc.

Post by **LPC** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:18 am

Dr. Caligari wrote:Too bad for Riley that there are no interrogatories under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

I think he was just trying to be civil.

Post by **Famspear** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:05 am

LPC wrote:

I think he was just trying to be civil.

drum rolllll tadadadumpt!

. · Post by . » Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:50 am

He takes pro se to new depths.

I wonder how many years will have to elapse before federal judges decide to stop the kid-glove handling of delusional TP clowns who cause them and their clerks to waste incredible amounts of time bending over backwards to accomodate idiocy and rubbish.

Imalawman · Post by **Imalawman** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:02 pm

Dezcad wrote: I think he's operating under the "Jurious Spurious Rules of Criminal Procedure". Those Rules are quite flexible in that "sovereigns" can make them up as they go along and require the "servant" government to answer.

Sounds like a kids breakfast cereal. Maybe he got his legal ideas off the back of the box...

Post by **webhick** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 1:09 pm

Imalawman wrote:
Dezcad wrote: I think he's operating under the "Jurious Spurious Rules of Criminal Procedure". Those Rules are quite flexible in that "sovereigns" can make them up as they go along and require the "servant" government to answer.
Sounds like a kids breakfast cereal. Maybe he got his legal ideas off the back of the box...

[jingle]
Jurious
Suprious
Don't settle for Cheerios
Jurious
Spurious
Go ahead and take a bite
[/jingle]

[announcer]Chock full of broken class and razor wire, it's just what you need to wake you up in the morning. So kids, before you grab that same old sugar and oat based cereal to accompany your double mocha latte swirl, remember that nothing goes better with coffee than the taste of your own blood![/quote]

[jingle]
Jurious
Suprious
Don't settle for Cheerios
Jurious
Spurious
Go ahead and take a bite
[/jingle]

Post by **The Observer** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:04 pm

Imalawman wrote:
Dezcad wrote: I think he's operating under the "Jurious Spurious Rules of Criminal Procedure". Those Rules are quite flexible in that "sovereigns" can make them up as they go along and require the "servant" government to answer.
Sounds like a kids breakfast cereal. Maybe he got his legal ideas off the back of the box...

I think you are giving him way too much credit...and slandering cereal makers in the process.

Dezcad · Post by **Dezcad** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:10 pm

You can hear a phone interview with the Juris Spurios himself at the Daniel J. Riley Legal Defense blog:

http://danrileyld.blogspot.com/

gezco · Post by **gezco** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:15 am

Dezcad wrote:You can hear a phone interview with the Juris Spurios himself at the Daniel J. Riley Legal Defense blog:

http://danrileyld.blogspot.com/

What a moron. He really likes to use double negatives. It that his out?

Nikki · Post by **Nikki** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:13 pm

For the latest, cover your keyboards and see

His court-appointed attorney still wants to withdraw. So Riley filed a motion to have the court make the attorney stop harrassing him.

So, Riley is now DEMANDING to be his own council [sic] and for the trial to be held in the appropriate district.

Habeas Corpus was DENIED

And in closing from

Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Open Letter to the Quatloos.com Judges of All Things Fraudulent
Dear Quatloos.com,

I wouldn't give you a "Quatloos" for your arm chair pontifications. I think you should spend more time watching archived episodes of "Star Trek" instead of impeaching others who, as mere indigent peasants, would dare to stand up to the Leviathan and present a challenge to its authority. I recommend you stick to opining about your founders' bailiwick on how to protect ones' financial assets in a fiat based financial system.

Sure, Daniel is far from perfect and not nearly as well resourced as the Plaintiff, but at least he has the brass to say enough is enough.

In closing, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. The arm chair generals are many and the peanut gallery is large but the floor of the Coliseum only has a few Gladiators in the contest. Daniel J. Riley is a modern day Spartacus, on the other hand, the Quatloos.com judges remind me of the Patricii of antiquity.

Kyrie Eleison

Posted by Bill Riley

Imalawman · Post by **Imalawman** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:41 pm

Nikki wrote:from
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Open Letter to the Quatloos.com Judges of All Things Fraudulent
Dear Quatloos.com,

I wouldn't give you a "Quatloos" for your arm chair pontifications. I think you should spend more time watching archived episodes of "Star Trek" instead of impeaching others who, as mere indigent peasants, would dare to stand up to the Leviathan and present a challenge to its authority. I recommend you stick to opining about your founders' bailiwick on how to protect ones' financial assets in a fiat based financial system.

Sure, Daniel is far from perfect and not nearly as well resourced as the Plaintiff, but at least he has the brass to say enough is enough.

In closing, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem. The arm chair generals are many and the peanut gallery is large but the floor of the Coliseum only has a few Gladiators in the contest. Daniel J. Riley is a modern day Spartacus, on the other hand, the Quatloos.com judges remind me of the Patricii of antiquity.

Kyrie Eleison

Posted by Bill Riley

For those that aren't familiar with greek (or aren't catholic) - it translates to "Lord, have mercy" - how fitting. It really should be Daniel's rallying cry.

. · Post by . » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:41 pm

Kyrie Eleison

Posted by Bill Riley

Perhaps Kyrie is also imprisoned.

YOU WILL represent me, I tell ya, YOU WILL! You can't withdraw! YOU WILL represent me! And stop harrassing me!

Post by **Demosthenes** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:51 pm

So tell us Brother Bill,

How close were you and your dog walker brother prior to his arrest?

Just how much is Danny finking to the Feds this time?

Why is Danny finking when he doesn't have a lawyer to help him cut a deal?

Post by **wserra** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:02 pm

Everybody say his own

Kyrie Eleison

Truthstalker · Post by **Truthstalker** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:03 pm

So tell us Brother Bill,

Bill will be on the Jack Blood show on WTPRN around 4:00PM Eastern today (10/23).

http://www.wtprn.com/listen.shtml

Cpt Banjo · Post by **Cpt Banjo** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:07 pm

Daniel J. Riley is a modern day Spartacus...

I'm Spartacus!

Imalawman · Post by **Imalawman** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:51 pm

Cpt Banjo wrote:
Daniel J. Riley is a modern day Spartacus...
I'm Spartacus!

No, I'm Spartacus!

. · Post by . » Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:10 pm

I'm Spartacus

Spurious Juridicus rules. If he has his properly executed oath of office.

Post by **Quixote** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:27 pm

So Riley filed a motion to have the court make the attorney stop harrassing him.

No, Riley filed a motion to stop the attorney from harrassing the defendant, a legal fiction known as DANNY RILEY. Maybe the attorney's conversations with DANNY RILEY are keeping Danny Riley awake.

Nikki · Post by **Nikki** » Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:35 pm

It's actually the OTHER voices that are keeping Danny Riley awake.

Just for you, Danny -- red ink.