Shem Allanson
If anyone is struggling. Here is my letter to rebutt an income tax 'demand'. The way to deal with it is 'conditional acceptance' as I have done here. They cannot take you to court if you have 'agreed to pay'. They then have to provide the evidence of claim. Wording is VERY important as you can unwittingly create 'joinder' so ask me to look any letters over (if you wish).
Dear
Without prejudice.
Regarding your letter dated 28 January 2020, Income Tax Return
A letter arrived at my house, dated 28th January 2020, and was addressed to MS S HEATHER ALLANSON, my legal fiction. This letter demanded the payment of 5245.34, claiming it was overdue. I opened the letter out of curiosity. Your letter will be kept on file as it will be needed in a lawful, Court of Record.
As you already know, because I informed you of this fact in my letter of 12th November 2019, I am not my legal fiction. I am living woman and my born date is listed with the Common Law Court. I own my legal fiction. I enclose proof of my birth listing and proof that I own my legal fiction. Do you, or your department, wish to contest the lawful validity of these documents?
A ruling by the Common Law Court on 31st August 2019, confirms that Statues and Acts do not apply to living men and women. See page 2, item 5 for details.
https://www.commonlawcourt.com/wp-conte ... r-31st.pdf
Of course, if you can prove that you have a lawful reason to demand this payment, from either the living woman or my strawman, I will be happy to pay. In order to prove the validity of your claim, I require the following:
1. Proof of authority - Under what authority do you make such a claim? I do not consent to these presumptions. You are a public servant. You do not have the authority to make such demands. The legal fiction is not your property, nor the governments property. It belongs to me.
2. Proof of jurisdiction – I am not within the statutory jurisdiction as proven by the documents enclosed. You cannot take or enforce any action against a living woman. If you think you can prove otherwise, please, show me the evidence?
3. Proof of consent - Statutes, acts and codes are not law. In fact, to refer to a statute, act or code as ‘law’ is fraud by misrepresentation and malfeasance in a public office. The actual definition of a statute is a legislative rule which is given the force of law by consent. My consent is required before your department can record and retain any of my private information, including my legal fiction and my address. I did not give my consent to the private-for-profit corporation that calls itself government. You do not have my consent and I withdraw any assumed consent for now and for the future. Consent cannot be assumed.
4. Proof of contract - We do not have a contract. I cannot be charged a fine for anything unless there is a contract agreeing to this. Contracts, not private corporations make law. There is no lawful contract between us. A lawful contract requires the following:
a. All parties must be living (As my legal fiction is dead, she does not have a contract either. I’m pretty sure about this. I tried talking to my birth certificate and got no response at all and she does not have a pulse).
b. All the terms must be laid out and must be agreed to, by both parties
c. No one can enter into a contract on my behalf
d. The contract must be an agreement between two living individuals and must be signed in wet ink. My legal fiction is not able to hold a pen and I certainly did not sign one.
e. There must be no coercion, duress or threat of loss of harm
f. Without full disclosure, or if the contract is not signed or correctly executed, then it is null and void. That is, full terms and conditions must be disclosed
g. The contract must be executed in the presence of an independent witness or in the presence of two of your officers
h. You cannot change a contract without notifying me in advance of any changes. I must be given the opportunity to reject the changes, or the whole contract, if I do not wish to accept those terms
i. There must be a true exchange of value
Without all of these things, no contract exists. So, you see, we do not have a contract. If you believe a contract between us exists, please show me the evidence?
5. Proof that I agreed to be represented by the legal fiction (strawman) – The legal fiction was created when I was less than one month old and created as a result of my parents registering my birth. They did this without realising they were signing me up to life as a ‘tax slave’. Had they known this, I’m pretty sure they would not have signed. In any case, no one can sign a contract for me, so anything based on the legal fiction is inherently fraudulent.
6. A correctly formatted invoice – What you have sent to my strawman is not a correctly formatted invoice. Is this 5245.34 sugar cubes? Perhaps you mean grains of sand? This is a fraudulent document used to trick me into paying you money on behalf of a dead legal fiction.
Without all of the things listed above you have no case for requesting 5245.34. If you fail to provide the requested evidence, you are tacitly agreeing that you do not have such evidence.
I have already withdrawn consent for my legal fiction to used. Your attempt at enforcement is based upon fraudulent use of my legal fiction. In my last letter, you were informed that should you continue to use my legal fiction for this purpose I would be invoicing you for the sum of £1000/dayin your private, individual capacity for every additional day that my name remained on the register. In addition, I would be invoicing your department for £5000/day. I would hold you liable for any Common Law Court costs. The fees started from the 17th October 2019.
I now calculate that you owe me the following for unlawful use of my legal fiction with regard to Income Tax: 105 days x £1000 = £105,000
Your department owes me the following for unlawful use of my legal fiction with regard to Income Tax: 105 days x £5,000 = £525,000
As regards your refusal to remove me from the tax records, that constitutes fraud and criminal coercion. You are acting ultra vires and this places you outside of government or corporate insurance for which you will be held liable in your private individual capacity.
You may confirm in writing that you have deleted any records relating to my legal fiction in writing within 14 days. Your failure to do so, is your tacit agreement that you and your department owe me the monies stated.
Yours sincerely
Shem, of the family Allanson
Standing under the Jurisdiction of the Common Law Court
