AnOwlCalledSage wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:59 am
Pottapaug1938 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:18 pm
"They have until noon on 09/11/2020 to issue the foregoing declarations, in which case [we've told them] the sentences they receive for their crimes will be tempered by their unequivocal agreement to do all they can to put right their myriad of wrongdoings."
I'm sure that the members of HM Government are shaking in their boots.
Or more likely, in this post-Jo Cox world, O'Bonkers will receive a visit from PC Plod and go on an extremist watch list. Threats to MPs are no longer just filed in the bin.
He's always just about to sock it to da man. Start having a go at MPs and the man might very well fight back. Let's just remind ourselves of his last communique 4th November;
MoB 4th November wrote:COVID-1984 PCP UPDATE After yesterday's developments, this morning we received a reaffirmation of our legal team's 100% commitment to running our case against Parliament.
In essence, they have agreed that the laying of the information cannot be delayed for three weeks, as proposed yesterday. Moreover, the have agreed that it must be laid by next Monday at the latest - the 9th of November [9/11/2020].
When I checked back today the post had been edited and now reads that the three weeks requested by his 'legal team' 5th Nov to perfect his bollox was time he was not prepared to wait. Gone is their agreement to act with all haste or that they are on board. Instead he's saying that efforts were made to serve the MPs 5th Nov, firstly by hand, then by courier and finally by Royal Mail. These were not in fact summonses, no, they were yet more boring old notices demanding
inter alia that they renounce the Queen and adopt Mike's very own Magnum Chartier from 2020 etc etc.
There is quite a schism opening up in the PLD and the wider loon-sphere.
On the one hand there is MC2015 which is 'immutable and can't be changed, esp Art 61'. Then there's another faction within PLD that say it was only signed by the king under duress (which is probably right because as soon as King John was back in his castle he set about renouncing it). Someone says that its all bollocks since Common Law was 'stolen' in 1066 when William paid a call. Sounds quite Trumpian.
A character calle Ian Surman invites a John Randles and other MoB adherents to;
join my new group A61 the truth its for the people to post facts for and against the legitimacy of Article 61
He concludes with the smoke blowing in the direction of Randle's backside;
you stuff is brilliant
Today was supposed to be the day it all kicks off with the MPs but to no-one's very great surprise MoB takes this year's Assassin prize for the world's tallest tall tale.
Deadlines come and go, MoB sails through them all pumping out his venom, nothing actually happens.